Abstract
This study reports on grade 4 children’s (Ss) knowledge of constraints and characteristics of persuasive written requests (RQ).
-
i)
All Ss wrote a first RQ asking money to improve their computer lab.
-
ii)
Experimental (E) and control (C) Ss evaluated 4 different RQ.
-
iii)
selected and ordered, out of 30 scrambled sentences, those appropriate for a “good” RQ.
-
iv)
A week later, E Ss had a collective “training discussion” on requests.
-
v)
A week later, E and C Ss wrote a second RQ asking money for their science lab.
Results pertaining to different aspects of the produced RQ showed that the training did have some effects but both groups improved in their II RQ. The results were interpreted as suggesting that both groups actually learned what an appropriate request is by carefully evaluating the 4 requests and by constructing a request from a sentence list.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, J. A. (1982). Children’s strategic use of requests to mark and manipulate social status. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Language, thought, and culture, (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Becker, J. A. (1986). Bossy and nice requests: Children’s production and interpretation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32 (4), 393–413.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirecteness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 131–146.
Dijk, T. A. van (1983). Cognitive and conversational strategies in the expression of ethnic prejudice. Text, 3, 375–404.
Erftmier, T., & Haas Dyson, A. (1986). “Oh, ppbbt!”: Differences between the oral and written persuasive strategies of school-aged children. Discourse Processes, 9, 91–114.
Hillocks, G. Jr. (1986). Research on written composition. Urbana (Ill.), E.R.I.C. Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
McKeown, K. R. (1985). Discourse strategies for generating natural language texts. Artificial Intelligence, 27, 1–41.
Reichman, R. (1981). Plain speaking. A theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Technical Report no. 4681, Bolt, Beranek & Newman Inc.
Rintell, E. (1981). Sociolinguistic variation and pragmatic ability: a look at learners. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 11–34.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd Ed., (pp. 778–803). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Thompson, S. A., & Mann, W. C. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 79–105.
Willbrand, M. L. & Rieke, R. (1986). Reason giving in children’s supplicatory compliance gaining. Communication Monographs, 53, 47–60.
Zammuner, V. L. (1981). Speech production. Strategies in discourse production. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.
Zammuner, V. L. (1982). Semantic discontinuities as text production strategies. In A. Flammer and W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing, (pp. 137–150). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zammuner, V. L. (1987a). For or against: The expression of attitudes in discourse. Text, 7, 411–434.
Zammuner, V. L. (1987b). Pragmatic factors and strategies in discourse production. In A. Bertuccelli-Papi & J. Verschueren (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective, (pp. 255–276). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
Zammuner, V. L. (1988). Discourse planning and production: An outline of the process and some variables. In M. Zock & G. Sabah (Eds.), Advances in natural language generation, (pp. 121–143). London: Pinter.
Zammuner, V. L. (1989a). Children’s knowledge and production of the request schema. In P. Boscolo (Ed.), Writing: Trends in European Research, (pp. 79–90). Padova: UPSEL Editore.
Zammuner, V. L. (1989b). Text production and the instruction to write texts. Paper presented at the International Conference “Psychology and psychologists today”, Lisbon 23–26 November.
Zammuner, V. L. (1990). Constructing and highlighting main points in production. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and Instruction. European Research in an International Context, Vol. 2.2, (pp. 309–328). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Zammuner, V. L. (1991). Strategies in discourse production: Computational models. In G. Dehniere and J.-P. Rossi (Eds.), Texts and text processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland, in press.
Zammuner, V. L., & Boscolo, P. (1988). How do I get it? Motivation and strategies in children’s written requests. Report no. 40, Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was partially supported by grants CT 87.01877.08 and CT 88.00964.08 of the Italian National Council For Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zammuner, V.L. Children’s writing of argumentative texts: Effects of indirect instruction. Eur J Psychol Educ 6, 243–256 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191942
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191942