Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Texture Characteristics of Malignant and Benign Tumors in Breast Ultrasonograms

  • Scientific Posters and Demonstrations
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated various texture features and region of interest (ROI) types of breast ultrasonograms in order to determine the best-performing combinations for differentiating between benign and malignant solid breast nodules. A total of 21 breast ultrasonograms (12 benign, nine malignant) containing solid breast nodules were evaluated. Eight ROI types were defined around the nodules. The texture feature of each ROJ was measured and the ratios of texture features were calculated for each pair of ROIs. This procedure was repeated for five different feature types, thus yielding texture feature ratios for 140 different combinations of ROIs and texture features. We evaluated the performance of the texture feature ratio in differentiating between benign and malignant nodules using t test analysis. Evaluating the top ranked texture and ROI combinations, we found edge density and mutual information were the best two texture features, and that the ROI types of outside lesion and lesion margin had good performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giger ML, Al-Hallaq AH, Huo Z, et al: Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast. Acad Radiol 6:665–674, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, et al: Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesion: The value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrasonic Imaging 15: 267–285, 1993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen DR, Chang RF, HuangYL: Breast cancer diagnosis using self-organizing map for sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 26:405–411, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg V, Manduca A, Ewert DL, et al: Improvement in specificity of ultrasonography for diagnosis of breast tumor by means of artificial intelligence. Med Phys 19:1475–1481, 1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain AK: Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1989, pp 342–400

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pitas I: Digital Image Processing Algorithms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp 281–295

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frederik M, Andre C, Dirk V: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transact Med Imaging 16:187–198, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Hyo Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.G., Kim, J.H. & Min, B.G. Comparative Analysis of Texture Characteristics of Malignant and Benign Tumors in Breast Ultrasonograms. Journal of Digital Imaging 14 (Suppl 1), 208–210 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190341

Keywords

Navigation