Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative structure — pharmacokinetic relationship of a series of sulfonamides in the rat

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pharmacokinetics of a series of sulfonamides were investigated after intravenous administration of a 7 mg/kg dose of individual sulfonamides to cannulated female lean Zucker rats. The concentrations of the sulfonamides in blood were determined by colorimetry. The blood concentration-time curves were fitted to a biexponential equation. The partition coefficient, log P, and pKa values of the sulfonamides were taken from the literature, log P and pKa values differed markedly across the series. The extent of protein binding varied enormously, increasing with partition coefficient. There was no significant relationship between the volume of distribution and partition coefficient. However, when the influence of protein binding on volume of distribution was eliminated, a significant linear relationship emerged. Total clearance formed a relatively complex nonlinear relationship with partition coefficient. The relationship of elimination half-life and partition coefficient was inverwe of that between clearance and partition coefficient because of a lack of significant relationship between volume of distribution and partition coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seydel JK., Tretin D., Cordes HP. (1980) Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships derived on antibacterial sulfonamides in rats and its comparison to quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem., 23, 607–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Overton E. (1897): Uber die osmotischen Eigenschaften der Zelle in ihrer Bedeutung fur die Toxikologie und Pharmakologie. Z. Phys. Chem., 22, 189–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer H. (1899): Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose. I. Welche Eigenschaft der Anasthetica beding ihre narkotische Wirkung? Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmakol., 42, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansch C., Fujita T. (1964): η-σ-п analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 1616–1626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Purcell WP., Bass GE., Clayton JM. (1973): Strategy of Drug Design: A Molecular Guide to Biological Activity. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansch C. (1978): In Chapman NB, Shorter J. eds. Correlation Analysis in Chemistry: Recent Advances. New York, Plenum, pp. 397–438.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin YC. (1978): Quantitative Drug Design. New York, Marcell Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seydel JK., Schaper K-J. (1979): Chemische Struktur und biologische Activitat von Wirkstoffen. Methoden der Quantitativen Struktur-Wirking Analyse. Weinheim, Verlag Chemie.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller GH., Doukas PH., Seydel JK. (1972): Sulfonamide structure activity relationships in a cell-free system. Correlation of inhibition of folate synthesis with antibacterial activity and physicochemical parameters. J. Med. Chem., 15, 700–706.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seydel JK. (1981): Mode of action and quantitative-structure activity relationship of sulfonamides in biological systems of different complexity (enzymes, bacteria, rat and human). Int. J. Quant. Chem., 20, 131–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ariens EJ., Simonis AM., Van Rossum JM. (1964): The relation between stimulus and effect. Mol. Pharmacol., 1, 394–466.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Belleau B. (1964): A molecular theory of drug action based on induced conformational perturbations of receptors. J. Med. Chem., 7, 776–784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy G. (1966): Kinetics of pharmacological effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 7, 362–372.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruger-Thiemer E., Bunger P. (1965/66): The role of therapeutic regimen in dosage design. Chemotherapia, 10, 61–73, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Toon S., Rowland M. (1979): Quantitative structure pharmacokinetic activity relationship with some tetracyclines. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 31 (suppl.), 43P.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toon S., Rowland M. (1983): Structure-pharmacokinetic relationships among the barbiturates in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 225, 752–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bird AE., Marshall AC. (1967): Correlation of serum binding of penicillins with partition coefficients. Biochem. Pharmacol., 16, 2275–2290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morishita T., Yamazaki M., Yata, N., Kamada A. (1973): Studies on absorption of drugs. VIII. Physicochemical factors affecting the absorption of sulfonamides from rat small intestine. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 21, 2309–2322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin Y-J., Awazu, S., Hanano M., Nogami H. (1973): Pharmacokinetic aspects of elimination from plasma and distribution to brain and liver of barbiturates in rats. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 21, 2749–2756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Houston JB., Upshall DG., Bridges JW. (1975): Further studies using carbamate esters as model compounds to investigate the role of lipophilicity in the gastrointestinal absorption of foreign compounds. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 195, 67–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritschel WA., Hammer GV. (1980): Prediction of volume of distribution from in vitro data and use for estimating the absolute extent of absorption. Int J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol., 18, 298–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seydel JK. (1984): Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships and their importance in drug design, possibilities and limitations. Meth. Findings Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 6, 571–581.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watari N., Sugiyama Y., Kaneniwa, N., Hiura M. (1988): Prediction of hepatic first-pass metabolism and plasma levels following intravenous and oral administration of barbiturates in the rabbit based on quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 16, 279–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seydel JK., Schaper K-J. (1982): Quantitative-structure pharmacokinetic relationships and drug design. Pharmacol. Ther., 15, 131–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anton AH., Boyle JJ. (1964): Alteration of the acetylation of sulfonamides by protein binding, sulfinpyrazone and suramin. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 42, 809–817.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heel RC., Avery GS. (1980): In: Avery GS. ed. Drug Treatment. New York, Adis Press, pp. 1121–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leo A., Hansch C., Elkins D. (1971): Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem. Rev., 71, 525–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaul S., Ritschel WA. (1987): Free fatty acids and the binding of sulfonamides in the serum of genetically obese Zucker rat. Meth. Finding Expt. Clin. Pharmacol., 9, 317–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaul S., Ritschel WA. (1988): Influence of obesety on sulfonamide disposition in Zucker rats. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet., 13, 273–283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bratton AC., Marshall, EK. Jr (1939): A new coupling component for sulfanilamide determination. J. Biol. Chem., 128, 537–550.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Metzler CM., Elfring GL., McEwan AJ. (1974): A package of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling. Biometrics, 30, 562–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner JG. (1976): Linear pharmacokinetic equations allowing direct calculation of many needed pharmacokinetic parameters from the coefficients and exponents of polyexponential equations which have been fitted to the data. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 4, 443–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Craig WH., Welling PG. (1977): Protein binding of antimicrobials. Clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 2, 252–268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brodie BB., Hogben AM. (1957): Some physicochemical factors in drug action. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 9. 345–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thorp JM. (1971): In: Buins TB. ed. Absorption and Distribution of Drugs. Edinburgh, Livingstone, pp. 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ariens EJ. (1971): In: Ariens EJ. ed. Drug Design. New York, Academic Press, pp. 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koizumi T., Arita T., Kekemi K. (1964): Absorption and excretion of drugs. XXI. Some pharmacokinetic aspects of absorption and excretion of sulfonamides. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 12, 428–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gibaldi M., Koup JR. (1981): Pharmacokinetic concepts-drug binding, apparent volume of distribution and clearance. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 20, 299–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Notari RE. (1973): Pharmacokinetics and molecular modification: implications in drug design and evaluation. J. Pharm. Sci., 62, 865–881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Struller T. (1968): In: Jucker E. ed. Progress in Drug Research, Vol. 22. Basel, Birkhauser, pp. 390–451.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Seydel JK., Miller G., Doukas PH. (1973): In: Pratesi P. ed. Medicinal Chemistry, London, Butterworths, pp. 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In memory of G. Ritschel, PhD — wife, mother, scientist and a friend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaul, S., Ritschel, W.A. Quantitative structure — pharmacokinetic relationship of a series of sulfonamides in the rat. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 15, 211–217 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190206

Key words

Navigation