Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schuirmann D.J. (1987): Comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 15, 657–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and research. (1999): Draft Guidance for Industry: Average, population and individual approaches to establishing bioequivalence. (Internet) http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index/htm

  3. Hauck W.W., Anderson S. (1992): Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 30:181–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and research. (1999): Draft Guidance for Industry: BA and BE studies for orally administered drug products — general consideration.

  5. Levy G. (1996): Bioequivalence assessment: Irrationality within a rational science. In: Midha K., Nagai T. (eds) Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies, FIP BIO-International ’96, Tokyo, Business Center for Academic Societies Japan, 29–32.

  6. Endrenyi L., Amidon G.L., Midha K.K., Skelly J.P. (1998): Individual bioequivalence: attractive in principle, difficult in practice. Pharm. Res., 15, 1321–1325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams R.L. (1999): Average and individual BE criteria to compare BE measures — replicate and non-replicate data sets. Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting. September 23–24, 1999, Rockville, MD, USA.

  8. Meyer M.C., Straughn A.B., Jarvi E.J. et al. (2000): Bioequivalence of methylphenidate immediate-release tablets using a replicated study design. Pharm. Res. In press.

  9. Barrett J.S., Batra V., Chow A. et al. (2000): PhRMA perspective on population and individual bioequivalence. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 40, 561–570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheiner L.B. (1992): Bioequivalence revisited. Stat. Med., 11, 1777–1788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

The FDA Population and Individual Bioequivalence Working Group functions under the Biopharmaceutics Coordinating Committee in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the US Food and Drug Administration. As of September 1999, the members of this working group were Mei-Ling Chen (Co-Chair), Rabindra Patnaik (Co-Chair), Dale Conner, Lawrence Lesko, Stella Machado, Donald Schuirmann, Roger L. Williams, Walter Hauck (consultant), and Terry Hyslop (consultant).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, R.L., Patnaik, R.N., Chen, ML. et al. The basis for individual bioequivalence. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 25, 13–17 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190050

Keywords

Navigation