Skip to main content
Log in

Cubic spline functions and polynomials for calculation of absorption rate

  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A model-independent method for calculation of the absorption rate based on an exact mathematical solution to the deconvolution problem of systems with linear pharmacokinetics and a polyexponential impulse responses has been examined. Theoretical analysis shows how a noninteracting primary input can be precisely evaluated when data on blood levels from a known source such as an i.v. bolus or zero-order infusion are available. This work compares the use of a Lagrange 3rd degree polynomial with that of a cubic spline function (special 3rd degree polynomial) for calculation of the absorption rate. The method is compared to another using simulated data (12 data points) containing various degrees of random noise. The accuracy of the methods is determined by how well the estimates represent the true values. It was found that the accuracy of the two methods was not significantly different, and that it was of the same order of magnitude as the noise level of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Rererences

  1. Schall R., Luus H.G. (1991):Comparison of absorption rates in bioequivalence studies of immediate release drug formulations. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol., 30, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen M.L. (1992):Alternative approach for the assessment of rate of absorption in bioequivalence studies. Pharm. Res., 9, 1380–1385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bois F.Y., Tozer T.N., Hauck W.W., Chen M.L., Patnaik R., Williams R.L. (1994):Bioequivalence performance of several measures of rate of absorption.Pharm. Res., 11, 966–974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herchuelz A. (1996):Bioequivalence assessment and the conduct of bioequivalence trials: a European point of view. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet., 21, 149–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Godbillon J., Cardot J.M., Lecaillon J.B., Lefevre G., Sioufi A. (1996):Bioequivalence assessment: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet., 21, 153–158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patnaik R., Lesko L.J., Chan K., Williams R.L. (1996):Bioequivalence assessment of generic drugs: an American point of view. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet., 21, 159–164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedersen V.P. (1980):Model-independent method of analyzing input in linear pharmacokinetic systems having polyexponential impulse response I: theoretical analysis. J. Pharm. Sci., 69, 298–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Popović J., Popović V. (1993):Analysis of toxicokinetic data by means of spline functons. Arch. Toxicol. Kin. Xen. Metab., 1, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popović, J. Cubic spline functions and polynomials for calculation of absorption rate. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 23, 469–473 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189997

Keywords

Navigation