Abstract
Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) integrates inquiry, problem- and project-based learning, cooperative learning, and authentic assessment. Case studies were carried out on 21 teachers who used CTL to teach science in elementary schools to diverse groups of children. The findings indicated that the conditions that fostered the implementation of CTL strategies were a collaborative interaction with students, a high level of activity in the lesson, a connection to real-world contexts, and an integration of science content with other content and skill areas. Furthermore, the CTL strategies were best implemented when teachers used them in conjunction with sound classroom management techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkin, J. M., Black, P. J., & Coffey, J. E. (Eds.). (2001).Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bentley, M., Ebert, C., & Ebert, E. S. (2000).The natural investigator: A constructivist approach to teaching elementary and middle school science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Billig, S. H. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service learning: The evidence builds.Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 658–664.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction.Elementary School Journal, 94, 539–551.
Brown, F. (2000). The effect of an inquiry-oriented environmental science on preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes about science.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(2), 1–6.
Cavallo, A. M. L., Miller, R. B., & Saunders, G. (2002). Motivation and affect toward learning science among elementary school teachers: Implications for classroom teaching.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 25–38.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002).Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice.Educational Researcher, 28(2), 5–15.
Columbia Education Center Website. (2004). Available online:<www.col-ed.org/ cur/index.html>. Retrieved June 26, 2004.
Doran, R., Chan, F., & Tamir, P. (1998).Science educator’s guide to assessment Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Downing, J., & Gifford, V. (1996). An investigation of preservice teachers’ science process skills and questioning strategies used during a demonstration science discovery lesson.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8(1), 64–75.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–162). New York: Macmillan.
Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., Sher, B. J., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem based learning in science classrooms.School Science and Mathematics, 95, 136–146.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1997).Entering the child’s mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.),Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, E. (2002).Contextual teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kumar, D., & Voldrich, J. (1994). Situated cognition in second grade science: Literature books for authentic contexts.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6(2), 1–10.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Lovle, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003).Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Lowery, L. F. (1997).NSTA pathways to the science standards—Elementary school education edition. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Meijer, P. C., Zanting, A., & Verloop, N. (2002). How can student teachers elicit experienced teachers’ practical knowledge?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 406–419.
Merriam, S. B. (2001).Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morrell, P. (2003). Cognitive impact of a grade school field trip.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 27–36.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ogle, D. S. (1986). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, B. F. Jones, & E. G. Carr (Eds.),Teaching reading as thinking (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11–17). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Piaget, J. (1951).The child’s conception of the world. Savage, MD: Littlefield Adams.
Project Wet curriculum & activity guide. (1995). Bozeman, MT: The Watercourse and the Council for Environmental Education.
Sears, S. J. (2002).Contextual teaching and learning: A primer for effective instruction. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Sears, S. J., & Hersh, S. (2000).Best practices in contextual teaching and learning: Program profiles and cross-profile analysis. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Silverman, D. (2000).Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Silverman, D. (2001).Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1988). Case study methods in education research: Seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.),Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253–265). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Tippins, D., Koballa, T., & Payne, B. (Eds.). (2002).Learning from cases: Unraveling the complexities of elementary science teaching. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glynn, S.M., Winter, L.K. Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools. J Elem Sci Edu 16, 51–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645