Skip to main content
Log in

Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools

  • Published:
Journal of Elementary Science Education

Abstract

Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) integrates inquiry, problem- and project-based learning, cooperative learning, and authentic assessment. Case studies were carried out on 21 teachers who used CTL to teach science in elementary schools to diverse groups of children. The findings indicated that the conditions that fostered the implementation of CTL strategies were a collaborative interaction with students, a high level of activity in the lesson, a connection to real-world contexts, and an integration of science content with other content and skill areas. Furthermore, the CTL strategies were best implemented when teachers used them in conjunction with sound classroom management techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkin, J. M., Black, P. J., & Coffey, J. E. (Eds.). (2001).Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, M., Ebert, C., & Ebert, E. S. (2000).The natural investigator: A constructivist approach to teaching elementary and middle school science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, S. H. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service learning: The evidence builds.Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 658–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction.Elementary School Journal, 94, 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F. (2000). The effect of an inquiry-oriented environmental science on preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes about science.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(2), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M. L., Miller, R. B., & Saunders, G. (2002). Motivation and affect toward learning science among elementary school teachers: Implications for classroom teaching.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002).Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice.Educational Researcher, 28(2), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbia Education Center Website. (2004). Available online:<www.col-ed.org/ cur/index.html>. Retrieved June 26, 2004.

  • Doran, R., Chan, F., & Tamir, P. (1998).Science educator’s guide to assessment Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J., & Gifford, V. (1996). An investigation of preservice teachers’ science process skills and questioning strategies used during a demonstration science discovery lesson.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8(1), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–162). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., Sher, B. J., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem based learning in science classrooms.School Science and Mathematics, 95, 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (1997).Entering the child’s mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.),Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. (2002).Contextual teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Voldrich, J. (1994). Situated cognition in second grade science: Literature books for authentic contexts.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Lovle, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003).Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, L. F. (1997).NSTA pathways to the science standards—Elementary school education edition. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P. C., Zanting, A., & Verloop, N. (2002). How can student teachers elicit experienced teachers’ practical knowledge?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 406–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2001).Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, P. (2003). Cognitive impact of a grade school field trip.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, D. S. (1986). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, B. F. Jones, & E. G. Carr (Eds.),Teaching reading as thinking (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11–17). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1951).The child’s conception of the world. Savage, MD: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Wet curriculum & activity guide. (1995). Bozeman, MT: The Watercourse and the Council for Environmental Education.

  • Sears, S. J. (2002).Contextual teaching and learning: A primer for effective instruction. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, S. J., & Hersh, S. (2000).Best practices in contextual teaching and learning: Program profiles and cross-profile analysis. Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2000).Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001).Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1988). Case study methods in education research: Seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.),Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253–265). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, D., Koballa, T., & Payne, B. (Eds.). (2002).Learning from cases: Unraveling the complexities of elementary science teaching. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn M. Glynn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glynn, S.M., Winter, L.K. Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools. J Elem Sci Edu 16, 51–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645

Keywords

Navigation