Skip to main content
Log in

Science buddies: An authentic context for developing preservice teachers’ understandings of learning, teaching, and scientific inquiry

  • Published:
Journal of Elementary Science Education

Abstract

Methods courses in teacher education programs have made a transition in the last years toward field-based experiences as part of the preparation for teaching science in the elementary school. However, little conclusive evidence exists as to any desirable influence field experiences are having on science teaching attitudes and learning.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the process, discuss the effectiveness and impacts, and highlight the implications of an extended field experience—the Science Buddy Program — on elementary pre-service teachers’ learning and conceptualization in the context of science teaching.

Results indicate that participation in this field experience that included pre-service teachers facilitating science learning with elementary children was beneficicial in the construction of the pedagogical content knowledge of the pre-service teachers. This experience also fostered positive attitudes toward science and science teaching and offered an excellent opportunity for future educators to observe science learning in progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflective orientation.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., Anderson, M. A., Cennamo, K. S., Campbell, L. M., & Hug, J. W. (1995, April).Investigating the process of becoming reflective: The use of video cases in elementary science teacher preparation. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

  • Anderson, R. D., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.),Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J. (1987). Early field experiences: Three viewpoints. In M. Haberman & J. M. Backus (Eds.),Advances in teacher education (Volume 3, pp. 75–93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1990). Early field experiences: Some key questions.The Teacher Educator, 25(3), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Teacher Educators. (1986).Guidelines for professional experiences in teacher education. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, J., Farris, P., & Henniger, M. (1988). Student perceptions of early clinical field experiences.Action in Teacher Education, 10(3), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, R. (2000). Learning to walk the walk: Teacher educators’ use of constructivist epistemology in their own practice.Professional Educator, 22(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R., & Gitlin, A. (1991). Educative communities and the development of the reflective practitioner. In R. Tabachnick & K. Zeichner (Eds.),Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education (pp. 33–55). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986).A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21 st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 268 120)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinchy, E. (1994). Higher education: The albatross around the neck of our public schools.Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 745–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. (1998).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997).Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977). The ethic of practicality: Implications for curriculum development. In A. Molnar & J. A. Zahorik (Eds.),Curriculum theory (pp. 74–80). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, K., Altmann, H., Haslett, K., & Latimer, J. (1984). Early exploratory field experiences in teacher preparation programs.Education Canada, 24, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleener, C. E. (1998).A comparison of the attrition rates of elementary teachers prepared through traditional undergraduate campus-based programs and elementary teachers prepared through centers for professional development and technology field-based programs by gender, ethnicity, and academic performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, Commerce, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Stiege, S. (1991).The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. J. (1990).Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (1988). Toward more realistic teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.),Action in teacher education, tenth-year anniversary issue (Commemorative ed., pp. 1–11). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. (1983). The effect of increased exploratory field experiences upon the perceptions and performance of student teachers.Action in Teacher Education, 5(1–2), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group. (1986).Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 454)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Reynolds, D. (2000). What does the teacher do: Constructivist pedagogies and prospective teachers’ beliefs about the role of a teacher.Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 21–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huling, L. (1998).Early field experiences in teacher education. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Series No. ED 429 054)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagory and informal science education.International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krustchinsky, R., & Moore, B. (1981). Early field experiences: A vital part in the training of elementary teachers.Kappa Delta Pi Record, 17(4), 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasley, T., & Applegate, J. (1984).Problems of early field experience students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Lortie, D. (1975).Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, N. V. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teachers to teach mathematics and science.School Science and Mathematics, 102, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. J. (1983).Field experiences in teacher education: From student to teacher. Washington, DC: Foundation for Excellence in Teacher Education and ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In J. Sikula (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 171–193). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestre, J. P. (1991). Learning and instruction in pre-college physical science.Physics Today, 9, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsohn, A. M., & Hawkins, S. (1994). Current practice in science education of prospective elementary school teachers. In S. Raizen & A. Michelsohn (Eds.),The future of science in elementary schools: Educating prospective teachers (pp. 151–161). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983).A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996).What matters most Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 931)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970).Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raizen, S., & Michelsohn, A. (Eds.). (1994).The future of science in elementary schools: Educating prospective teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, K., & Sandoval, P. (1997). The seamless field experience model for secondary science teacher preparation.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. F., Carpenter, J. R., & Safko, J. L. (1996). Dynamics of a constructivist astronomy course for in-service teachers.Journal of Geoscience Education, 44, 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepans, J. I., McClung, P. A., & Beiswenger, R. E. (1995). A teacher education program in elementary science that connects content, methods, practicum, and student teaching.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. (1980). Effect of field experiences during elementary methods courses on pre-service teacher behavior.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gable (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning: A project of the National Science Teachers Association (pp. 45–91). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C. (2000).Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weld, J., & French, D. (2001). An undergraduate science laboratory field experience for pre-service science teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. (1996). Science teacher preparation as part of systemic reform in the United States. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.),Issues in science education (pp. 24–33). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Moseley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moseley, C., Ramsey, S.J. & Ruff, K. Science buddies: An authentic context for developing preservice teachers’ understandings of learning, teaching, and scientific inquiry. J Elem Sci Edu 16, 1–17 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173642

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173642

Keywords

Navigation