Skip to main content
Log in

Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment Programme: Important issues in research and evaluation

L’Instrumental Enrichment Programme de Feuerstein: recherches et évaluation

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key elements underlying Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment Programme are described together with the programme’s aims. Suggestions are made as to appropriate ways of evaluating the programme’s effectiveness and a summary of most of the available large and small scale research prior to 1986 is given. This research is itself evaluated in the light of previous suggestions and found to be deficient on a number of counts. Nevertheless, a degree of cautious optimism with regard to the potential effects of FIE is considered warranted. Suggestions are made as to how future research might overcome the pitfalls of earlier studies by the application of alternative evaluation strategies.

Résumé

Les conceptions sous-jacentes à l’«Instrumental Enrichment Programme» de Feuerstein et les objectifs de ce programme font l’objet d’une description qui en dégage les éléments clés. L’auteur fait des suggestions sur les méthodes les plus adaptées à l’évaluation des effets du programme et passe en revue la plupart des travaux disponibles antérieurs à 1986. Ces travaux font eux-mêmes l’objet d’une évaluation critique à la lumière des suggestions de l’auteur. Il apparaît néanmoins, qu’à condition d’être prudent, on peut accorder une relative confiance aux effets de FIE. Des suggestions sont faites, dans la perspective des recherches futures, afin de surmonter les difficultés antérieures rencontrées par un renouvellement des stratégies d’évaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbitman-Smith, R. (1980). New developments with Instrumental Enrichment: a vehicle for the study of cognitive development. In P. Mittler (Ed.),Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of the International Association of the Scientifique Study of Mental Deficiency. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbitman-Smith, R., & Haywood, H. C. (1980). Cognitive education for learning-disabled adolescents.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbitman-Smith, R., Haywood, H. C., & Bransford, J. D. (1982). Assessing cognitive change. In C. M. McCauley, R. Sperber & P. Brooks (Eds.),Learning and Cognition in the Mentally Retarded. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, F. (1984). An evaluation of Feuerstein’s model for the remediation of adolescents’ cognitive deficits.PhD. Thesis, Chelsea College, University of London.

  • Blagg, N. (1985). Introduction of Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment Programme into four Bridgwater Secondary Schools.Focus—Somerset Education Magazine (3)

  • Bradley, T. B. (1983). Remediation of cognitive deficits: a critical appraisal of the Feuerstein model.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 27, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainin, S. S. (1982). The effects of Instrumental Enrichment on the reasoning abilities, reading achievement and task orientation of 6th grade underachievers.Ed. D. thesis. University of Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In Mussen, P. (Ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume III (pp. 77–166). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Handbook of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

  • Derry, S. J., & Murphy, D. A. (1980). Designing systems that train learning ability: from theory to practice.Review of Educational Research, 50, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman M. B. (1979).The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: the Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980).Instrumental Enrichment: an intervention programme for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Miller, R., Hoffman, M. B., Rand, Y., Mintzker, Y., & Jensen, M. (1981). Cognitive modifiability in adolescence: cognitive structure and the effects of intervention.Journal of Special Education, 15, 269–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. E. (1981). Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment used to change cognitive and verbal behaviour in a city-core, multi-ethnic, Toronto Secondary School.Ed. D. Thesis. University of Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. (1976).Curriculum Evaluation. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (1974). The effectiveness of psycholinguistics training.Exceptional Children, 41, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, H. C., & Arbitman-Smith, R. (1981). Modification of cognitive functions in slow-learning adolescents. In P. Mittler (Ed.),Frontiers of Knowledge in Mental Retardation. Vol. 1. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, H. C., Arbitman-Smith, R., Bransford, J. D., De Iclos, V., Towery, J., Hannel, L. I., & Hannel, M. V. (1982). Cognitive education with adolescents: evaluation of Instrumental Enrichment.Paper presented at 6th International Symposium of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency. Toronto (August).

  • Howie, R., Thickpenny, J. P., Leaf, C., & Absolum, M. (1985). The piloting of Instrumental Enrichment in New Zealand with eight mildly retarded children.Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, B. (1975). In D. Tawney (Ed.)Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D. (1983), Cognitive education for the hearing-impaired adolescent.Internal report; School of Education and Human Services, Gallandet College, Washington DC.

  • Martin, S. D. (1984). Thinking skills for teachers: infusing cognitive strategies into preparation programs.Internal report; School of Education and Human Services, Gallandet College, Washington DC.

  • Narrol, H., Silverman, H., & Waksman, M. (1982). Developing cognitive potential in Vocational High School students.Journal of Educational Research, 76, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, P., Larsen, S., & Hammill, D. (1975). A response.Exceptional Children, 42, 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: redeveloping cognitive structure.The Educational Forum, 44, 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, Y., Mintzker, Y., Miller, R., Hoffman, M. B., & Friedlender, Y. (1981). The Instrumental Enrichment Program: immediate and long-term effects. In P. Mittler (Ed.),Frontiers of Knowledge in Mental Retardation, Vol. 1, (pp. 141–152). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raziel, S. (1981). Effects of mediated learning experience on cognitive modifiability, locus of control and self-esteem.M. Phil thesis. Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal-Dawson, C. A. (1981). Something happened. Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment in a Bucks E.S.N. (M) school.Dissertation for Diploma of Professional Studies, Oxford Polytechnic, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1984). How can we teach intelligence?Educational Leadership (September) 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971).Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. F. E. Peacock, Itasca, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, K. & Craft, A. (1983)Making Up Our Minds: an exploratory study of Instrumental Enrichment. London: Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burden, R. Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment Programme: Important issues in research and evaluation. Eur J Psychol Educ 2, 3–16 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172703

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172703

Key words

Navigation