Abstract
Since 1983, the 422-bed Victoria General Hospital (VGH) and Siemens Electric Limited have been piloting the implementation of digital medical imaging, including digital acquisition of diagnostic images, in British Columbia. Although full PACS is not yet in place at VGH, experience to date has been used to project annual cost figures (including capital replacement) for a fully digital department. The resulting economic evaluation has been labeled hypothetical to emphasize that some key cost components were estimated rather than observed; this paper presents updated cost figures based on recent revisions to proposed departmental equipment configuration. Compared with conventional diagnostic imaging, digital imaging appears to raise overall annual costs at VGH by nearly $0.7 million, (Canadian currency) or 11.6%; this is more favorable than the previous results, which indicated extra annual costs of $1 million (16.9%). Sensitivity analysis still indicates that all reasonable changes in the underlying assumptions result in higher costs for digital imaging than for conventional imaging. Digital imaging appears likely to offer lower radiation exposure to patients, shorter waiting times, and other potential advantages, but as yet the price of obtaining these benefits remains substantial.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Parrish D, Warburton RN, Zelman W: Cost and economic analysis for PACS: A tutorial. Proceedings of Image Management and Communications, Washington, DC, 1989, pp 262–269
Fisher PD, Brauer GW, Nosil J, et al: Comprehensive computerized medical imaging (CCMI) at Victoria General Hospital: Final implementation plan. SPIE Med Imaging IV, 1990 (in press)
Saarinen AO, Haynor DR, Loop JW, et al: Modelling the economics of PACS: What is important? SPIE Med Imaging III 62–73:1989
Andriessen JHTH, ter Haar Romeny BM, et al: Savings and costs of a picture archiving and communication system in the University Hospital Utrecht. SPIE Med Imaging III 578–584:1989
Arenson RL, Seshadri SB, Hiss S, et al: PACS at Penn. SPIE Med Imaging III 50–59:1989
Cywinski JK, Vanden Brink JA: Review of experience with PACS cost analysis model. SPIE Med Imaging III 535–538:1989
van Gennip EMSJ, Ottes FP, van Poppel BM, et al: Why do cost-benefit studies of PACS disagree? SPIE Med Imaging IV, 1990 (in press)
Vanden Brink JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving, and Communication (PACS) Tracking Study. Proprietary study by Technology Marketing Group, Des Plaines, IL, 1986
Vanden Brink JA: Medical Image Processing, Archiving, and Communication (PACS) Tracking Study. Proprietary study by Technology Marketing Group, Des Plaines, Illinois, 1987
Quality and Utilization Management Program of the Greater Victoria Hospital Society: Internal data, 1989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the British Columbia Ministry of Health and by National Health Research Development Program Grant No. 6610-1437-X.
This research was performed at Victoria General Hospital and the British Columbia Ministry of Health, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warburton, R.N., Fisher, P.D., Nosil, J. et al. Digital diagnostic imaging with a comprehensive PACS: Hypothetical economic evaluation at a large community hospital. J Digit Imaging 3, 101–107 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170569
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170569