Skip to main content
Log in

Respecting children’s agency for learning and rights to participation in child care programs

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The rights of participation for children in child care programs have not received strong attention. This is because the primary purpose of such programs is not to serve the needs of children. Government in many western countries support and promote child care primarily to serve economic imperatives related to parental participation in employment. The nature of many child care programs act against the recognition of the rights of young children in these institutional settings unless adults appreciate that children are agents of their own learning. This paper reports an empirical analysis of child care workers’ understandings of toddlers’ learning, within centre-based child care programs. The analyses draw on responses from 21 child care workers to questions about how children learn, how they know when children have learnt something, and examples of learning by young children which they had observed in their practice. The analyses provide insight into child care practices as the child care workers explain their experiences and understandings about children’s learning. The analyses revealed a sense of mutual engagement in learning between adults and children. Children’s participation is encouraged by collaboration between adults and children, shared understandings, and adult respect for children’s autonomy and independence.

Résumé

Les droits de participation des enfants aux programmes de garde à l’enfance n’ont pas été l’objet de beauccoup d’attention. La raison est la suivante: la fonction principale de ces programmes n’est pas de répondre aux besoins des enfants. Les gouvernements de nombreux pays occidentaux soutiennent et favorisent la garde à l’enfance d’abord pour des impératifs économiques liés à la participation parentale à l’emploi. La nature de bien des programmes de garde à l’enfance va à l’encontre de la reconnaissance des droits des jeunes enfants dans ces institutions, à moins que les adultes ne reconnaissent que les enfants sont les agents de leur propre apprentissage. Cet article présente une analyse empirique de la compréhension de l’apprentissage des toutpetits par les éducateurs, à l’intérieur de programmes centralisés de protection de l’enfance. Les analyses se basent sur les réponses de 21 éducateurs à des questions sur la façon d’apprendre des enfants, sur leur manière de savoir quand les enfants ont appris quelque chose, et sur des exemples d’apprentissage par les jeunes enfants qu’ils ont pu observer au cours de leur travail. Les analyses donnent une idée des pratiques en matière garde à l’enfance, les éducateurs expliquant leur expérience et leur compréhension de l’apprentissage des enfants. Les analyses ont révélé un certain engagement mutuel dans l’apprentissage entre adultes et enfants. La participation des enfants est encouragée via la collaboration entre adultes et enfants, la compréhension mutuelle, ainsi que le respect par les adultes de l’autonomie et de l’indépendance des enfants.

Resumen

Los derechos de participación de los niños en programas de asistencia infantil no han recibido la atención que se merecen. Esto se debe a que el objetivo principal de estos programas no es atender las necesidades de los niños. El gobierno de muchos países occidentales apoya y fomenta la asistencia infantil principalmente para que los padres puedan trabajar y favorecer así la economía del país. La mayoría de estos programas se opone al reconocimiento de los derechos infantiles en el ámbito institucional. El único modo de que esto no ocurra es que los adultos comprendan que los niños son responsables de su propio aprendizaje. Este documento recoge un análisis empírico acerca de cómo interpretan los profesionales la enseñanza de los pequeños dentro de programas que se centran en la asistencia infantil. El análisis refleja las respuestas de 21 educadores a preguntas acerca de cómo aprenden los niños y cómo saben cuándo el niño ha asimilado los conocimientos. También recoge ejemplos de aprendizaje que han podido observar en algunos niños. Estos datos nos permiten comprender los métodos de asistencia infantil utilizados, ya que los maestros nos explican sus propias experiencias en este sector y su interpretación sobre el modo en que los niños aprenden. El análisis pone de manifiesto la necesidad de que exista un compromiso mutuo entre adultos y niños para que el proceso de aprendizaje se Ileve a cabo con éxito. La participación de los niños aumenta cuando existe colaboración y comprensión mutua entre niños y adultos, y los adultos respetan la autonomía e independencia de los niños.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2003).Child Care. Catalogue 4402.0. Canberra, ACT: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P. (2000).Young children’s rights: Exploring beliefs, principles and practices. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelsen, D., Brownlee, J., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2002). Caregivers’ epistemological beliefs in toddler programs.Early Child Development and Care, 172, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, J., Berthelsen, D., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2004). Working with toddlers in child care: Personal epistemologies and practice.European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12 (1) 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. M. (1998). More law and more rights: will children benefit.Child and Family Social Work, 3, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W., Molinari, L., & Rosier, K. B. (2002). Zena and Carlotta: Transition Narratives and early education in the United States and Italy.Human Development, 45, 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, D. (2002). Children’s citizenship and the structuring of adult-child relations in the primary school.Childhood, 9(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. (1997). Piaget’s social theory.Educational Researcher, 26 (2), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (2003). New directions: charting paths for the role of sociocultural theory in early childhood education and curriculum.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4 (3) 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., & Gauvain, M. (1992). Social and cultural influences on children’s collaborative interactions. In L. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.),Children’s development within social context. Research and methodology: Volume 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flekkøy, M. G., & Kaufman, N. H. (1997).The participation rights of the child: Rights and responsibilities in family and society. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1998). The sociology of childhood and children’s rights.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 6, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.),Personal Epistemology: The psychological beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3–14). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning.Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 88–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans, M. (2004). Children as Citizens: Towards a contemporary notion of child participation.Childhood, 11(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2000). The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 8, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, R. (1999, June).How should we care for babies and toddlers? An analysis of practice in out-of-home care for children under three. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education London University.

  • Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2004). Firsthand learning through intent participation.Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and Social Aspects of Learning.Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S., & Samuelsson Pramling, I. (2001). Children’s conceptions of participation and influence in pre-school: A perspective on pedagogical quality.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2 (2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Opening, opportunities and obligations.Children & Society, 15, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B. (2002). Interpreting and supporting participation rights: contributions from sociocultural theory.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 10, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomanovic, S. (2003). Negotiating children’s participation and autonomy within families.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Berthelsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berthelsen, D., Brownlee, J. Respecting children’s agency for learning and rights to participation in child care programs. IJEC 37, 49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168345

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168345

Keywords

Navigation