Abstract
The purposes of this study were to determine whether (1) fractures are interpreted differently after digitization and electronic presentation; (2) there are differences in accuracy between screen radiographs and electronic presentation; (3) differences in interpretation are a function of monitor resolution; and (4) differences in interpretation between radiographs and electronic images relate to radiological subspecialty. Forty cases with fractures of varying degrees of subtlety and 35 cases without fractures were interpreted. Radiographs were digitized with 2 different systems and displayed on 3 monitors of different spatial resolution. Four radiologists, with varying experience, were asked to decide whether fractures were present, absent, or they were uncertain. Accuracy of interpretation increased with improved electronic image presentation and monitor resolution. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fracture detection on System A were 63%, 98%, and 78%, respectively. The results were 72%, 98%, and 84% with System B. System C results were 81%, 97%, and 88% with Lumiscan 75, and 82%, 96%, and 88% with Lumiscan 150. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy results of the original radiograph interpretation were 89%, 95%, and 92%. Results were significantly different for System A. No significant differences were found for the other systems compared with film radiographs. System A did not have adequate monitors for interpretation of subtle fractures. Systems B and C were capable of displaying even subtle fractures. Our initial results indicate that interpretation with high-quality 1K×1K monitors is substantially similar to radiograph interpretation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scott WW, Bluemke DA, Mysko WK, et al: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: Teleradiology workstations versus radiograph readings. Radiology 195:223–229, 1995
Wilson AJ, Hodge JC: Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: A performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images. Radiology 196:565–568, 1995
Murphy MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, et al: Nondisplaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 174:865–870, 1990
Scott WW, Rosenbaum JE, Ackerman SJ, et al: Subtle orthopaedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 187:811–815, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bancroft, L.W., Berquist, T.H., Morin, R.L. et al. Fracture interpretation using electronic presentation: A comparison. J Digit Imaging 13, 13–18 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168335
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168335