Abstract
Background
Of over 20 different scoring systems to evaluate outcome following calcaneal fracture, the Maryland Foot Score has broad current acceptance. A general health survey, the Short Form 36 (SF 36) has also been used.
Aims
The study compared two scoring systems for assessing the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Methods
Over a four-year period, 31 displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were categorised by the Sanders classification and treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Outcome was assessed by the Maryland Foot Score and by the Short Form 36 (SF 36) general health questionnaire.
Results
Thirty-five per cent of fractures were Sanders class 2, 57% were class 3 and 8% were class 4. The average follow-up was 2.5 years (range 1–4 years). Using the Maryland Foot Score, seven fractures had an excellent result, 13 had a good result, six had a fair result and one was a failure. There was a correlation between pain (coefficient = 0.780, p<0.001) and physical function (coefficient = 0.638, p< 0.001) with the appropriate sections of the SF 36.
Conclusion
The Maryland Foot Score measures what it attempts to measure and therefore it has content validity for pain and physical function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thordarson DB, Krieger LE. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: A prospective randomised trial.Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17: 2–9.
O’Farrell DA, O’Byrne JM, McCabe JP, Stephens MM. Fractures of the os calcis: improved results with internal fixation.Injury 1993; 24: 263–5.
Noble J, McQuillan WM. Early posterior subtalar fusion in the treatment of fractures of the os calcis.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1979; 61-B: 90–3.
Pozo JL:, Kirwin EOG, Jackson AM. The long term results of conservative management of severely displaced fractures of the calcaneum.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1984; 66-B: 386–90.
Kundel K, Funk E, Brutscher M, Bickel R. Calcaneal fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment.J Trauma 1996; 41: 839–45
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al: Clinical ratings systems for the ankle, hindfoot, hallux and lesser toes.Foot Ankle Intl 1994; 15: 349–53
Kerr PS, Prothero DL and Atkins RM. Assessing outcome following calcaneal fracture: a rational scoring system.Injury 1996; 27: 35.
Thermann H, Krettek C, Hufner T, Schratt HE, Albrecht K, Tscherne H. Management of calcaneal fractures in adults. Conservative versus operative treatment.Clin Orthop 1998; 353: 107–24.
Sammarco GJ, Taylor AL. Operative management of Haglund’s deformity in the nonathlete: a retrospective study.Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 724–9
Sanders R, Fortin P, Dipasquale T and Walling A. Operative treatment of 120 displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.Clin Orthop 1993; 290: 87.
Stephens HM, Sanders R. Calcaneal malunion: results of a prognostic computed tomography classification system.Foot 1996; 17: 395–401
Hildebrand K, et al. Functional outcome measures after displaced intra articular calcaneal fractures.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78-B: 119.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998, 80-B(1): 63–9.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.J Bone and Joint Surg (Br) 1996, 78-B(2): 185–90.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996, 78-B 593–600.
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.Br Med J 1993; 306: 1437–40
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?Br Med J 1993; 306: 1440–4.
Insall JN, Dorr LD, ScottRD and Scott WN. Rationale of The Knee Society clinical rating system.Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 13.
O’Doherty D. The Foot in Outcome Measures in Trauma. Eds: Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT, Carr AJ Butterworth-Heinemann 1994
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heffernan, G., Khan, F., Awan, N. et al. A comparison of outcome scores in os calcis fractures. IJMS 169, 127–128 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166916
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166916