Skip to main content
Log in

State recognition of same-sex relationships and preparations for end of life among lesbian and gay boomers

  • Same-Sex Marriage Supplement
  • Published:
Sexuality Research & Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors compared 793 nonheterosexual baby boomers on their relationship status (single or in a civil union) and the state in which they lived (did or did not recognize same-sex civil unions). Analyses revealed patterns attributable to participants’ relationship status, state recognition, and the combination of these variables. Findings showed that state recognition of same-sex unions has an impact not only on nonheterosexual individuals’ current quality of life but also on their future plans and emotional responses to those plans. A lack of legal recognition requires nonheterosexuals to take greater action to ensure that their end-of-life wishes will be carried out, and may lead to their having increased fears about late life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J. C., & Mitteness, L. S. (1990). Invisible care-givers in the spotlight: Non-kin caregivers of frail older adults. In J. F. Gubrium & A. Sankar (Eds.),The home care experience: Ethnography and policy (pp. 101–127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., Herdt, G., & de Vries, B. (2006). Social support in the lives of lesbians and gay men at midlife and beyond.Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 3(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrick, B. R. (1997, January 31). Letter from the Office of the General Counsel, United States General Accounting Office, to Henry J. Hyde, chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, regarding the Defense of Marriage Act. Retrieved November 4, 2008, fromhttp://www.gao. gov/archive/l997/og97016.pdf

  • Bergling, T. (2004).Reeling in the years: Gay men’s perspective on age and ageism. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. S., & Demian. (1994). Relationship characteristics of American gay and lesbian couples: Findings from a national survey.Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 1(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., & Khodyakov, D. (2007). End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: An assessment of psychosocial influences.The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, S135-S141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. H. (2007). Advance directives: Know what you want; get what you need.Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82, 1460–1462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. (1996). Good care of the dying patient.Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 474–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B. (2006). Home at the end of the rainbow: Supportive housing for LGBT elders.Generations, 29(4), 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B. (2007). LGBT couples in later life: A study in diversity.Generations, 31(3), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B., Blando, J. A., Southard, P., & Bubeck, C. (2001). The times of our lives. In G. Kenyon, P. Clark, & B. de Vries (Eds.),Narrative gerontology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 137–158). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, B., & Megathlin, D. (in press). The meaning of friends for gay men and lesbians in the second half of life.Journal of GLBT Family Studies.

  • Doligosa, F., Jr. (2004, July 30). Maine domestic partner registry starts today.Portland Press Herald, p. B2.

  • Essoyan, S. (1997, December 23). Hawaii’s domestic-partner law a bust; ambiguity blamed.Los Angeles Times, p. A5.

  • Fahrenthold, D. A. (2005, October 2). Connecticut’s first same-sex unions proceed civilly.The Washington Post, p. A03.

  • Gates, G. J., Badgett, M. V. L., & Ho, D. (2008, July).Marriage, registration and dissolution by same-sex couples in the U.S. [Working paper]. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay and Lesbian Medical Association. (n.d.).Guidelines for care of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. Retrieved October 29, 2008, fromhttp:// ce54.citysoft.com/ data/n 0001/resources/live/ GLMA%20guidelines%202006%20FINAL.pdf

  • Grossman, J. (2004, January 13). The New Jersey domestic partnership law, its formal recognition of same-sex couples, and how it differs from other states’ approaches. Retrieved October 4, 2008. fromhttp:// writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20040113.html

  • Herek, G. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective.American Psychologist, 61, 607–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • High, D. M. (1994). Families’ roles in advance directives.Hastings Center Report, 24(6), S16-S18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, F. (2000). Preferences for surrogate decision makers, informal communication and advance directives among community-dwelling elders: Results from a national study.The Gerontologist, 40, 449–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, S. S. (2001, November 8). Senate approves D.C. funding of domestic-partners law; vote moves the city closer to implementing 1992 measure.The Washington Post, p. B09.

  • Kuhl, D. (2003).What dying people want: Practical wisdom for the end of life. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochhead, C. (2000, April 26). Gay unions win final vote in Vermont.San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1.

  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. M., Waldo, C. R., & Rothblum, E. D. (2001). A model of predictors and outcomes of outness among lesbian and bisexual women.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71, 61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, P. M. (1999).Gay men’s friendships: Invincible communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten, B. L. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities of psychological issues into adult life.Human Development, 12, 121–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. F., Goldberg, A., Kuvalanka, K., & Clausell, E. (2008). Structural and moral commitment among same-sex couples: Relationship duration, religiosity, and parental status.Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 411–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partners Task Force for Gay & Lesbian Couples. (1995).Partners national survey of lesbian & gay couples: Summary of results. Retrieved September 19, 2008, fromhttp://buddybuddy.com/survey.html

  • Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 cc (a) (1990).

  • Pew Research Center. (2006, January 5).Strong public support for right to die: More Americans discussing—and planning—end-of-life treatment. Retrieved October 29, 2008, from Pew Research Center for the People & the Press website:http://people-press. org/report/266/strong-public-support-for-right-to-die

  • Quam, J. K., & Whitford, G. S. (1992). Adaptation and age-related expectations of older gay and lesbian adults.The Gerontologist, 32, 367–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. (2007). The consequences of marriage policy for same-sex couples’ well-being. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 65–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., & Horne, S. (2009). Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual citizens in the 2006 election.Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 6(1), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., Prather, R. A., & Hamrin, R. (2005). The execution of legal documents by sexual minority individuals.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 138–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Dudley, M., & Wright, M. L. C. (2006). Relational commitment: A qualitative analysis of same-sex couples’ conversations.Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenborn, C. A. (2004, December 15).Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002. Retrieved October 29, 2008, fromhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/ad/ad351.pdf

  • Simon, M. (2003, September 20). Davis signs bill giving partners rights.San Francisco Chronicle, p. A15.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). No. 53. Marital status of the population by sex and age: 2003.Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2004–2005. Retrieved November 4, 2008, fromhttp://www.census.gov/ prod/2004pubs/04statab/pop.pdf

  • Von Drehle, D. (2003, November 19). Gay marriage is a right, Massachusetts court rules.The Washington Post, p. A01.

  • Weston, K. (1991).Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies.American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian de Vries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Vries, B., Mason, A.M., Quam, J. et al. State recognition of same-sex relationships and preparations for end of life among lesbian and gay boomers. Sex Res Soc Policy 6, 90–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165990

Key words

Navigation