Skip to main content
Log in

Early and delayed Tc-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the utility of the myocardial tracer Tc-99m-tetrofosmin in the examination of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and to investigate Tc-99m-tetrofosmin uptake and retention in the myocardium, early and delayed Tc-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT was performed in 10 patients having LBBB without coronary stenosis.Methods: After 740 MBq of Tc-99m-tetrofosmin injection in the resting state, the early and delayed SPECT imaging was done at 30 min and 180 min, respectively.Results: Decreased Tc-99m-tetrofosmin uptake in the septal segments was observed in 4 patients (40%) at 30 min and in 9 (90%) at 180 min. Reverse redistribution was seen in 9 of 10 patients. In patients with LBBB, the septal-to-lateral uptake ratio was lower in the delayed images than in the early images (0.80 ± 0.09 vs. 0.89 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). In patients with LBBB, the washout rate of Tc-99m-tetrofosmin was higher in the septal segments than in the lateral segments (28.3 ±4.3% vs. 22.8 ± 3.3%, p < 0.001).Conclusion: The SPECT data indicate that in LBBB without coronary stenosis, the uptake of Tc-99m-tetrofosmin is decreased in the septal wall, and that reverse redistribution occurs frequently. Our results contribute to the elucidation of both the cellular biokinetics of Tc-99m-tetrofosmin in the myocardium and the hemodynamics of the septum in LBBB, and indicate the possible clinical utility of Tc-99m-tetrofosmin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirzel HO, Senn M, Nuesch K, Buettner C, Pfeiffer A, Hess OM, et al. Thallium-201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle branch block.Am J Cardiol 53: 764–769, 1984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger BC, Abramowitz R, Park CH, Desai AG, Madsen MT, Chung EK, et al. Abnormal thallium-201 scans in patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries.Am J Cardiol 52: 365–370, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marin Huerta E, Rodriguez Padial L, Castro Beiras JM, Pey Illera J, Asin Cardiel E. Thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy in patients having complete left bundle branch block with normal coronary arteries.Int J Cardiol 16: 43–46, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delonca J, Camenzind E, Meier B, Righetti A. Limits of thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy to detect coronary disease in patients with complete and permanent bundle branch block: a review of 134 cases.Am Heart J 123: 1201–1207, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knapp WH, Bentrup A, Schmidt U, Ohlmeier H. Myocardial scintigraphy with thallium-201 and technetium-99m-hexakis-methoxyisobutylisonitrile in left bundle branch block: a study in patients with and without coronary artery disease.EurJ Nucl Med 20: 219–224, 1993.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurata C, Terada H, Fujii T, Fujita R, Sasaki Y. A201Tl perfusion defect in a case with rate-dependent left-bundle branch block (LBBB).Eur J Nucl Med 10: 169–171, 1985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. James TN. Pathology of small coronary arteries.Am J Cardiol 20: 679–691, 1967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugiyama M, Hirotaka K, Ohkawa S: A clinicopathological study on 25 cases of complete left bundle branch block.Jpn Heart J 20: 163–176, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tamaki N, Takahashi N, Kawamoto M, Torizuka T, Tadamura E, Yonekura Y, et al. Myocardial tomography using technetium-99m-tetrofosmin to evaluate coronary artery disease.J Nucl Med 35: 594–600, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaret BL, Rigo P, Wackers FJT, Hendel RC, Braat SH, Iskandrian AS, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with99mTc tetrofosmin. Comparison to201Tl imaging and coronary angiography in a phase III multicenter trial.Circulation 91: 313–319, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain D, Wackers FJT, Mattera J, McMahon M, Sinusas AJ, Zaret BL. Biokinetics of technetium-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging agent: implications for a one-day imaging protocol.J Nucl Med 34: 1254–1259, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sridhara BS, Braat S, Rigo P, Itti R, Cload P, Lahiri A, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m-tetrofosmin versus thallium-201 in coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol 72: 1015–1019, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakajima K, Taki J, Shuke N, Bunko H, Takata S, Hisada K. Myocardial perfusion imaging and dynamic analysis with technetium-99m-tetrofosmin.J Nucl Med 34: 1478–1484, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Platts EA, North TL, Pickett RD, Kelly JD. Mechanism of uptake of technetium-tetrofosmin. I: Uptake into isolated adult rat ventricular myocytes and subcelluar localization.J Nucl Cardiol 2: 318–326, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Younes A, Songadele JA, Maublant J, Platts E, Pickett R, Veyre A. Mechanism of uptake of technetium-tetrofosmin. II: Uptake into adult isolated rat heart mitochondria.J Nucl Cardiol 2: 327–333, 1995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lev M, Unger PN, Rosen KM, Bharati S. The anatomic base of the electrocardiographic abnormality of left bundle branch block.Adv Cardiol 14: 16–24, 1975.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herbert WH. Left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease.J Electrocardiol 8: 317–324, 1975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brake CM. Complete left bundle branch block and asymptomatic airmen.Aero Med 40: 781–782, 1969.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson R, Mitchell A, Ahmed M, Towers M, Yacoub M. Conduction defects in aortic valve disease.Am Heart J 98: 3–10, 1979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider JF, Thomas HE, Kreger BE, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: the Framingham study.Ann Intern Med 90: 303–304, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McGown RL, Welch TG, Zaret BL, Bryson AL, Martin ND, Flamm MD. Noninvasive myocardial imaging with potassium-43 and rubidium-81 in patients with left bundle branch block.Am J Cardiol 38: 422–428, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burns RJ, Galligan L, Wright LM, Lawand S, Burke RJ, Gladstone PJ. Improved specificity of myocardial thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with left bundle branch block by dipyridamole.Am J Cardiol 68: 504–508, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rockett JF, Wood WC, Moinuddin M, Loveless V, Parrish B. Intravenous dipyridamole thallium-201 SPECT imaging in patients with left bundle branch block.Clinical Nucl Med 15: 401–407, 1990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, Barnhart CS. Adenosine thallium-201 is superior to exercise thallium-201 for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 1332–1338, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaduganathan P, He Z, Raghavan C, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block: Exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging?J Am Coll Cardiol 28: 543–550, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ono S, Nohara R, Kambara H, Okuda K, Kawai C. Regional myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism in experimental left bundle branch block.Circulation 85: 1125–1131, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugihara, H., Kinoshita, N., Adachi, Y. et al. Early and delayed Tc-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block. Ann Nucl Med 12, 281–286 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164914

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164914

Key words

Navigation