Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distribution of soil organic matter in freshwater emergent/open water wetlands in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area

  • Special Section on Wetlands in an Urbanizing Landscape
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We measured soil organic matter (SOM) concentrations in a large sample (n=95) of freshwater emergent and open water wetlands in the Portland, Oregon, USA, area as part of a study of the ecological development of mitigation wetlands. Mean SOM concentrations were higher in naturally occurring wetlands (NOWs) than in mitigation wetlands (MWs) at 0–5 cm (SOM=9.75 and 5.83%, respectively, p=0.0001) and at 15–20 cm (SOM=6.85, 4.68%, p=0.0551). If temporal accumulation of SOM is occurring, it is slow; we found no significant relationship between SOM and wetland age (p=0.6003) and no significant change in SOM concentration in soils in MWs sampled in 1987 and 1993. Concentrations of SOM were not significantly related to land use but were related to soil series, texture class, and association, and to hydrogeomorphic class. For a subset of wetlands monitored for hydrology, we also found a significant negative relationship between SOM and the extent of inundation by standing water. Mitigation may be leading to direct loss of SOM, probably resulting from soil management practices during project construction. We also show that hydrologic regime significantly affects SOM. Because most projects in our study were built in pre-existing wetlands and have extensive areas of open water, our results suggest that low concentrations of SOM are likely to persist. For SOM and probably for SOM-supported wetland functions, fundamental goals of mitigation and wetland management (in-kind wetland replacement, no-net-loss of structure and function) are not being achieved, at least in the short term. The success of mitigation, in terms of SOM, could be improved by better project design and better management of soils during project construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bishel-Machung, L., R. P. Brooks, S. S. Yates, and K. L. Hoover. 1996. Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L. J., B. A. Schumacher, P. W. Shaffer, K. A. Cappo, M. L. Papp, R. D. van Remortel, D. S. Coffey, M. G. Johnson, and D. Chaloud. 1990. Handbook of Methods for Acid Deposition Studies: Laboratory Analyses for Soil Chemistry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA. EPA/600/4-90/058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E., D. White, and A. L. Schaedel, 1991. Oregon ecological regions and subregions for water quality management. Environmental Management 15:847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confer, S. R. and W. A. Niering. 1992. Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA). Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Conservation Foundation. 1988. Protecting America’s Wetlands: An Action Agenda. Final Report of the National Wetlands Policy Forum. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRue. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, C. B., S. W. Broome, and E. D. Seneca. 1988. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic carbon pools in natural and transplanted marsh soils. Estuaries 11:272–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. M. 1995. Endemic Wetlands of the Willamette Valley, Oregon. p. 1–8.In Studies of Plant Establishment Limitations in Wetlands of the Willamette Valley, Oregon. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-RE-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, F. P., Jr. and J. P. Megonigal. 1993. The relationship between variable hydroperiod, production allocation, and below ground organic turnover in forested wetlands. Wetlands 13:115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. P. and P. M. Groffman. 1994. Comparing microbial parameters in natural and constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwire, K. A., P. W. Shaffer, S. E. Gwin, T. K. Magee, J. Honea, R. G. Gibson, and T. Ernst. 1997. Quality Assurance Report for the Oregon Wetlands Study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory—Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR, USA. EPA/600/R-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, K. L. 1991. An evaluation of mitigation in the South Florida Water Management District, Volume 1. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerig, A. J. 1985. Soil Survey of Clackamas County, Oregon. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. D., J. B. Zedler, and R. Langis. 1994. Limited response of cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) to soil amendments in a constructed marsh. Ecological Applications 4:757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink, J. G. and R. E. Turner. 1978. the role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. p. 63–78.In R. E. Good, D. F. Whigham, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. L. 1982. Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. L. 1983. Soil Survey of Multnomah County, Oregon. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, P. M., G. C. Hanson, E. Kiviat, and G. Stevens. 1996. Variation in microbial biomass and activity in four different wetland types. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60:622–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guard, B. J. 1995. Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwin, S. E., M. E. Kentula, and P. W. Shaffer. 1999. Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles. Wetlands 19:(477–489).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C. C., J. E. Honea, S. E. Gwin, and M. E. Kentula. 1995. Wetland degradation and loss in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon, Wetlands 15:336–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A., J. B. Millar, and A. G. van der Valk. 1989. Vegetation of wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region. p. 132–187.In A. G. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula, M. E., R. E. Brooks, S. E. Gwin, C. C. Holland, A. D. Sherman, and J. C. Sifneos. 1992a. An Approach to Decision Making in Wetland Creation and Restoration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA. EPA/600/R-92/150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula, M. E., J. C. Sifneos, J. W. Good, M. Rylko, and K. Kunz. 1992b. Trends and patterns in Section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington. Environmental Management 16:109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusler, J. A. and M. E. Kentula. 1990. Executive Summary. p. xvii-xxv.In J. A. Kusler and M. E. Kentula (eds.) Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langis, R., M. Zalejko, and J. B. Zedler. 1991. Nitrogen assessments in a constructed and a natural salt marsh of San Diego Bay. Ecological Applications 1:40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathwell, D. J., H. F. Mulligan, and D. R. Bouldin. 1969. Chemical properties, physical properties, and plant growth in twenty artificial wildlife marshes. New York Fish and Game Journal 16:158–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau, C. W. and L. R. Hossner. 1981. Substrate characterization of an experimental marsh and three natural marshes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45:1171–1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, T. K., S. E. Gwin, R. G. Gibson, C. C. Holland, I. Honea, P. W. Shaffer, J. C. Sifneos, and M. E. Kentula. 1993. Research Plan and Field Manual for the Oregon Wetlands Study. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA. EPA/600/R-93/072.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVoy, G. R. 1988. Advantages of open water/emergent wetlands for mitigation and a holistic approach to banking. p. 289–290.In J. A. Kusler, M. L. Quammen, and G. Brooks (eds.) Mitigation of Impacts and Losses. Association of State Wetland Managers. Berne, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, B. A. 1995. Seed banks and species richness potential of coal slurry ponds reclaimed as wetlands. Restoration Ecology 3:311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and J. W. Webb, Jr. 1997. Use of natural and createdSpartina alterniflora salt marshes by fishery species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 151:165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. T. and W. B. Bowden. 1986. A mechanistic, numerical model of sedimentation, mineralization, and decomposition for marsh sediments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:96–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, L. D. and L. A. Levin. 1991. AreSpartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council, USA). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODLCD. 1992. What is an Urban Growth Boundary? Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. Salem, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1988. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. A. and F. E. Clark. 1989. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, M. S. and M. S. Fonseca. 1996. Fixing compensatory mitigation: What will it take? Ecological Applications 6:94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, J. N., E. D. Seneca, and T. R. Wentworth. 1994. Infaunal community development of artificially established salt marshes in North Carolina. Estuaries 17:489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scatolini, S. R. and J. B. Zedler. 1996. Epibenthic invertebrates of natural and constructed marshes of San Diego Bay. Wetlands 16:24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, P. W., M. E. Kentula, and S. E. Gwin. 1999. Characterization of wetland hydrology using hydrogeomorphic classification. Wetlands 19:(490–504).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simenstad, C. A. and R. M. Thom. 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications 6:38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson, 1995. An Approach for Assessing Wetland Functions Using Hydrogeomorphic Classification, Reference Wetlands, and Functional Indices. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. E., Jr. 1963. Man-made Marshes for Maine Waterfowl. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game. Augusta, ME, USA. Game Division Bulletin # 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. B. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1984. Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples and Methods of Analysis for Soil Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, USA. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamies of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59:322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. 1983. Limnology. Saunders College Publishing Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. and R. Langis. 1991. Comparisons of constructed and natural salt marshes of San Diego Bay. Restoration and Management Notes 9:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dynamac Corporation Environmental Sciences, 200 SW 35th Street, 97333, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Paul W. Shaffer & Ted L. Ernst

Authors
  1. Paul W. Shaffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ted L. Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul W. Shaffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaffer, P.W., Ernst, T.L. Distribution of soil organic matter in freshwater emergent/open water wetlands in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area. Wetlands 19, 505–516 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161689

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161689

Key Words

Search

Navigation