Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spectral reflectance characteristics of California subalpine marsh plant communities

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reflectance spectra (414–948 nm) were recorded at ground level from leaves and canopies of subalpine marsh macrophytes near Lake Tahoe, California in 1994. Canopy architecture of the dominant species suggested that canopy reflectance should differ from one another: yellow pond-lily (Nuphar polysepalum) has a horizontal canopy; hardstem bulrush (Scipus acutus) has a vertical canopy; beaked sedge (Carex rostrata) has a spherical (randomly distributed) canopy. Data were used to 1) analyze effects of canopy architecture on reflectance properties, 2) examine effects of canopy architecture on use of spectral vegetation indices as predictors of biomass, and 3) develop methods for detecting species distributions. Leaf reflectance spectra were different in shape and magnitude across the spectrum, with canopy architecture and cover having marked effects on albedo and wavelength-dependent variance among samples.Nuphar polysepalum (horizontal canopy) showed the least difference between canopy and leaf reflectance,S. acutus (vertical canopy) reflectance was most affected by canopy architecture, andC. rostrata (spherical canopy) was intermediate. Reflectance in the near infrared (NIR) region was strongly reduced, while reflectance in the visible region was minimally affected, producing small red/NIR differences and low vegetation indices. Seven vegetation indices were tested for correlation with plant biomass. Fresh and dry green biomass ofC. rostrata were significantly correlated with all indices (p<0.002), while no correlation was found between any index and fresh or dry green biomass ofN. polysepalum (p>0.13) orS. acutus (p>0.21), suggesting that spectral indices as estimators of biomass assume a spherical vegetation canopy. Differences between Thematic Mapper (TM) bands 3 (red) and 2 (green) normalized by the sum of reflectance (TM3 — TM2)/(TM3+TM2)), was significantly different among species (p<0.05) and was used as the basis of a supervised classification of a large Lake Tahoe marsh. The classification agrees with the data on distributions of species and expected distributions in relation to water depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Adamus, P. and K. Brandt. 1990. Impacts on quality of inland wetlands of the United States: A survey of indicators, techniques and applications of community-level biomonitoring data. Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., J. Hanson, and R. Haas. 1993. Evaluating Landsat Thematic Mapper derived vegetation indices for estimating above-ground biomass on semiarid rangelands. Remote Sensing of Environment 45:165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. I. and J. D. Hanson. 1992. Evaluating hand-held radiometer derived vegetation indices for estimating aboveground biomass. Geocarto International 7:71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asrar, G. 1989. Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baret, F. 1995. Use of spectral reflectance variation to retrieve canopy biophysical characteristics. Ch. 3.In F. Anson and S. Plummer (eds.) Advances in Environmental Remote Sensin. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baret, F. and G. Guyot. 1991. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 35:161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baret, F., V. Vanderbilt, M. Steven, and S. Jacquemoud. 1994. Use of spectral analogy to evaluate canopy reflectance sensitivity to leaf optical properties. Remote Sensing of Environment 48:253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E. and L. Curtis. 1993. Introduction to Environmental Remote Sensing (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, D. and V. Klemas. 1980. Quantitative assessment of tidal wetlands using remote sensing. Environmental Management 4: 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, E., B. Holben, and V. Kalb. 1989. Accuracy of the AVHRR vegetation index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux. Vegetatio 80:71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. and E. Milton. 1982. Remote sensing of salt marsh vegetation in the first four proposed Thematic Mapper bands. International Journal of Remote Sensing 3:147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. 1986. The myth of the most sensitive species. Bioscience 36:670–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant populations. Ch. 8.In J. Jackson, L. Buss and R. Cook (eds.) Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, L. 1996. The era of commercial earth observation satellites. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62:39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamon, J., C. Field, M. Goulden, K. Griffin, A. Hartley, G. Joel, J. Peñuelas, and R. Valentini. 1995. Relationships between NDVI, canopy structure and photosynthesis in three Californian vegetation types. Ecological Applications 5:28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, N. 1988. Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data. Remote Sensing Reviews 4:1–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goward, S. and K. Huemmrich. 1992. Vegetation canopy PAR absorbance and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index—an assessment using the SAIL model. Remote Sensing of Environment 39:119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., M. Hardisky, P. Wolf, and V. Klemas. 1993. Relationships amongTypha biomass, pore water methane and reflectance in a Delaware (U.S.A.) brackish marsh. Journal of Coastal Research 9:339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardisky, M., R. Smart, and V. Klemas. 1984. Remote sensing of biomass and annual net aerial primary productivity of a salt marsh. Remote Sensing of Environment 16:91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardisky, M., M. Gross, and V. Klemas. 1986. Remote sensing of coastal wetlands. Bioscience 36:453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. (ed.). 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. and H. Mooney (eds.). 1990. Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. 1988. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 23:213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A., C. Justice, and H. Liu. 1994. Development of vegetation and soil indices for MODIS-EOS. Remote Sensing of Environment 49:224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker C. and D. Carpenter (eds.). 1990. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: ecological indicators. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M. and M. Mogie. 1990. The spatial structure of clonal plants: control and consequences. p. 57–76.In J. van Gronendael and H. de Kroon (eds.) Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. and P. Pinter. 1986. Spectral response of architecturally different wheat canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment 20:43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemoud, S. 1990. Inversion of the PROSPECT+SAIL canopy reflectance model from AVIRIS equivalent spectra: theoretical study. Remote Sensing of Environment 44:281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemoud, S. and F. Baret. 1990. PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment 34:75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski, M. 1990. Sensitivity of the normalized difference vegetation index to subpixel canopy cover, soil albedo and pixel scale. Remote Sensing of Environment 32:169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., T. Sharik, R. Mayes, and E. Smith. 1987. Nature and cause of zonation discreteness around glacial prairie marshes. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1622–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R., C. ter Braak, and O. van Tongeren. 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Y. and D. Tanre. 1992. Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 30:261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, K. and S. Levin. 1985. Limitations of laboratory bioassays: the need for ecosystem-level testing. Bioscience 35:165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimes, D. 1984. Modeling the directional reflectance from complete homogenous vegetation canopies with various leaf-orientation distributions. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1:725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landres, P., J. Verner, and J. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conservation Biology 15: 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand, T. and R. Kiefer. 1994. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. and A. Huete. 1995. A feedback based modification of the NDVI to minimize canopy background and atmospheric noise. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 33:457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, H. 1957. A Flora of the Marshes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. and J. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M., P. Pinter, B. Clothier and S. Allen. 1989. Effect of water stress on the canopy architecture and spectral indices of irrigated alfalfa. Remote Sensing of Environment 29:251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4:355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. and L. Miller. 1972. Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of short grass prairic, Pawnee National Grasslands, Colorado. p. 1357–1381.In Eighth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peñuelas, J., J. Gamon, K. Griffin and C. Field. 1993. Assessing community type, plant biomass, pigment composition and photosynthetic efficiency of aquatic vegetation from spectral reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 46:110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinty, B. and M. Verstraete. 1992. GEMI—A non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Vegetatio 101:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, J., A. Chehbouni, A. Huete, and Y. Kerr 1994. A modified soil adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 48:119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J., R. Haas, J. Schell, D. Deering, and J. Harlan. 1974. Monitoring the vernal advancement of retrogradation of natural vegetation. Final Report Type III, NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center. Moffet Field, CA, USA.

  • Sculthorpe, C. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. 1984. A Flora of the Tahoe Basin and Neighboring Areas and Supplement. University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. and F. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanglet, H. 1995. Establishment of a long-term vegetation monitoring program for Pope Marsh, South Lake Tahoe, California. Report to Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, United States Forest Service, South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA.

  • Storer, T. and R. Usinger. 1963. Sierra Nevada Natural History. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, G. 1972. The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy. Remote Sensing of Environment 2:117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combination for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8: 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C., I. Fung, C. Keeling, and R. Gammon. 1986. Relationship between atmospheric covariation and a satellite derived vegetation index. Nature 319:195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ustin, S., M. Smith, and J. Adams. 1992. Remote sensing of ecological processes: a strategy for developing and testing ecological models using spectral mixture analysis. p. 339–358.In J. Ehrlinger and C. Field (eds.) Scaling Ecological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Academic Press. San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, W. 1984. Light scattering by leaf layers with applications to canopy reflectance modeling: the SAIL model. Remote Sensing of Environment 16:125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, W. 1985. Earth observation modeling based on layer scattering matrices. Remote Sensing of Environment 17:165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, S., M. Brown and J. Lewis. 1981. Factors involved in estimating green biomass by canopy spectro-reflectance measurements. Journal of Range Management 34:105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickland, D. 1989. Future directions for remote sensing in terrestrial ecological research. p. 691–724.In G. Asrar (ed.) Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, C. and L. Richardson. 1990. A. Use of spectral vegetation indices to infer leaf area, evapotranspiration and yield: I. Rationale. Agronomy Journal 82:623–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windell, J., B. Willard, D. Cooper, S. Foster, C. Knud-Hansen, L. Rink and G. Kiladis. 1986. An ecological characterization of Rocky Mountain montane and subalpine wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 86(11).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, 95616, Davis, California, USA

    Harry J. Spanglet & Eliska Rejmankova

  2. Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, 95616, Davis, California, USA

    Susan L. Ustin

Authors
  1. Harry J. Spanglet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan L. Ustin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eliska Rejmankova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spanglet, H.J., Ustin, S.L. & Rejmankova, E. Spectral reflectance characteristics of California subalpine marsh plant communities. Wetlands 18, 307–319 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161526

Key Words

Search

Navigation