Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of national wetland inventory maps to inventory wetlands in the southern Blue Ridge of Virginia

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The area of wetlands in the U.S. is being estimated as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Minimal information is available to verify the effectiveness of NWI maps to inventory wetlands or delineate jurisdictional wetlands. We evaluated the use of NWI maps (1∶24,000 scale) to inventory and delineate jurisdictional wetlands in the Virginia Blue Ridge. Each wetland identified in the Woolwine and Meadows of Dan NWI maps was field-checked to determine if the areas met the criteria as a jurisdictional wetland. Of the 171 palustrine wetlands identified, 91% met the criteria. Jurisdictional wetlands were delineated in four 2.5-minute study areas. Two study areas, located in the Blue Ridge Highlands region, contain 91.8 and 109.3 hectares of jurisdictional wetlands. The NWI maps indicated 2.5 and 17.4 hectares of wetlands in these two study areas. A similar but smaller discrepancy occurred in the areas mapped in the Blue Ridge Escarpment region. We concluded, because of the small scale that photo interpreters must work with and the number of wetlands located in dense woodlands, that NWI maps may not adequately inventory wetlands in the Blue Ridge. This conclusion was based on a detailed study of 22% (6888 ha) of the area covered on the NWI maps. Predominant plant species in the forested, scrub-shrub, and emergent wetlands were red maple (Acer rubrum), speckled alder (Alnus rugosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus), respectively, Wetland soils were classified as Typic Humaquents and Humaqueptic Fluvaquents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bastian, R.K. and J. Benforado. 1988. Water quality functions of wetlands: Natural and managed systems. p. 87–97.In D.D. Hook, W.H. McKee, H.K. Smith, J. Gregory, V.G. Burrell, M.R. DeVoe, R.E. Sojka, S. Gilbert, R. Banks, L.H. Stolzy, C. Brooks, T.D. Matthews, and T.H. Shear (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands. Vol. 1: Ecology of Wetlands. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.P. 1989. An overview of ecological functions and economic values of wetlands. p. 11–20.In S.K. Majumdar, R.P. Brooks, F.J. Brenner, and R.W. Tiner, Jr. (eds.) Wetlands Ecology and Conservation. Emphasis in Pennsylvania. Typehouse of Easton, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butera, M.K. 1983. Remote sensing wetlands. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 21:383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA, FWS/OBS-79/31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T.E. 1993. Use of hydric soils in national programs of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. p. 348.In Agronomy Abstracts, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, W.J., D.D. Rector, and J.S. Quesenberry. 1992. Wet soils of Virginia. p. 93–99.In J.M. Kimble (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th International soil correlation meeting (VIII ISCOM): Characterization, classification, and utilization of wet soils. USDA. Soil Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report Y-87-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S.A. 1986. The delineation and classification of inland wetlands utilizing fcir stereo imagery. p. 713–716.In M.C.J. Damen, G.S. Smit, and H.T. Verstappen (eds.) Remote Sensing for Resources Development and Environmental Management, Enschede, the Netherlands, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Deliniation. 1989. Federal manual for identifying and deliniating jurisdictional wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA-SCS, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, R.L. and J.E. Witty. 1982. New designations for soil horizons and layers and the new soil survey manual. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46:443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H.A.P. 1983. Hydrology. p. 67–158.In A.J.P. Gore (ed.) Ecosystems of the World, Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen, and Moor. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J.R., E.J. Christensen, and R. Sharitz. 1984. Nontidal wetland mapping in South Carolina using airborne multispectral scanner data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 16:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H., R.B. Williams, and R.D. Scheffe. 1988. Wetland evapotranspiration in temperate and arid climates. p. 146–160.In D.D. Hook, W.H. McKee, H.K. Smith, J. Gregory, V.G. Burrell, M.R. DeVoe, R.E. Sojka, S. Gilbert, R. Banks, L.H. Stolzy, C. Brooks, T.D. Matthews, and T.H. Shear (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands. Vol. 1: Ecology of Wetlands. Timber Press, Portland, OR. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead, K.K. 1990. Diversity of hydric soils in North Carolina, USA. Environmental Management 14:241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988a. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: 1988 Virginia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA. Biological Report 88 (18.46).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988b. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 88 (26.2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, J. and D. Quattrochi. 1978. The verification of Landsat data in the geographical analysis of wetlands in Tennessee. NASA Contractor Report No. 3012. Knoxville, TN, USA.

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1951. Soil survey manual. USDA-SCS Agricultural Handbook No. 18. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1992. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 5th edition. Blacksburg, VA, USA. Soil Management Support Services Technical Monograph No. 19.

  • Swartwout, D.J. 1982. An evaluation of the National Wetlands Inventory in Massachusetts. M.S. Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States. Current status and recent trends. National Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1988. Field guide to nontidal wetland identification. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, USA. and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R.W. 1991. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. Bioscience 41:236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS, 1991. Hydric soils of the United States. USDA-SCS, Washington, DC, USA. Misc. Publication No. 1491.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolt, M.H., Baker, J.C. Evaluation of national wetland inventory maps to inventory wetlands in the southern Blue Ridge of Virginia. Wetlands 15, 346–353 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160889

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160889

Key Words

Navigation