Skip to main content
Log in

Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I simulated loss of small, legally unprotected freshwater wetlands in a 600 km2 area of Maine, USA to examine how loss of small wetlands altered the geometry of the wetland mosaic and thereby might affect the dynamics of metapopulations of wetland-associated organisms. Loss of small wetlands resulted in total wetland area declining by 19% (from 2032 to 1655 ha), total wetland number declining by 62% (from 354 to 136 wetlands), and average inter-wetland distance increasing by 67% (from 0.6 to 1.0 km). Also, average upland-wetland proximity decreased by 50% (0.5 to 1.0 km), such that just 54% of the landscape was within the maximum migration distance (1000m) of terrestrial-dwelling and aquatic-breeding amphibians after loss of small wetlands, versus 90% before loss. A spatially-structured demographic model revealed that local populations of turtles, small birds, and small mammals, stable under conditions of no wetland loss, faced a significant risk of extinction (P > 5%) after loss of small wetlands. No change in metapopulation extinction risk was evident for salamanders or frogs, largely because high rates of population increase buffered these taxa against local extinction. These results suggest that small wetlands play a greater role in the metapopulation dynamics of certain taxa of wetland animals than the modest area comprised by small wetlands might imply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Akçakaya, R. and S. Ferson. 1990. RAMAS/space User Manual; spatially-structured population models for conservation biology. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bent, A. C. 1968. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Parts I, II. III. U. S. National Museum Bulletin 237, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Berven, K. A. and T. A. Grudzien. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44: 2047–2056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breden, F. 1987. The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of Fowler’s toad,Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia: 386–395.

  • Clarke, R. D. 1977. Postmetamorphic survivorship of Fowler’s toad,Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia 1977: 594–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. J. and F. C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, J. D., G. L. Breitenbach, and R. C. van Loben Sels. 1983. Nesting ecology and hatching success in the turtleEmydoidea blandingii. Herpetologica 39: 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, J. D., G. L. Breitenbach, R. C. van Loben Sels, and D. W. Tinkle. 1987. Reproduction and nesting ecology of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) in southeastern Michigan. Herpetologica 43: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, J. D., J. L. Greene, and J. W. Gibbons. 1986. Biomass of freshwater turtles: a geographic comparison. American Midland Naturalist 115: 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, C. K. 1990. Effects of habitat fragmentation on a streamdwelling species, the flattened musk turtleSternotherus depressus. Biological Conservation 45: 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman, W. E. and L. B. Trueb, 1986. Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T. 1968. Territoriality in the bulifrog,Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1968: 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, N. R., D. M. Stoddert, and B. Bobels. 1975. Patterns of demography in small mammal populations. p. 73–102.In F. G. Golley, K. Petrusewiez, and L. Ryszkowski (eds.) Small Mammals: Their Productivity and Population Dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. W. 1986. Movement patterns among turtle populations: applicability to management of the desert tortoise. Herpetologica 42: 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P., J. R. Longcore, D. G. McAuley, and J. K. Ringelman. 1991. Use of wetland habitats by selected nongame water birds in Maine. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Fish and Wildlife Research 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. E. 1978. The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt,Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecological Monographs 48: 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. E. 1968. Terrestrial activity of the spotted salamander,Ambystoma maculatum. Copeia 1968: 879–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and M. E. Gilpin. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herried, C. F. and S. Kinney. 1966. Survival of Alaskan wood frog (Rana sylvatica) larvae. Ecology 47: 1039–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesser, H. 1969. Die lebensweise der erdkrote,Bufo bufo (L.); das orientierungsproblem. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 76: 443–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husting, E. L. 1965. Survival and breeding structure in a population ofAmbystoma maculata. Copeia 1965: 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. L. 1955. The population dynamics of the cliff frog.Syrrhopus marnocki. American Midland Naturalist 54: 342–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. L. 1956. Growth, dispersal, and survival of the Pacific tree frog. Copeia 1956: 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. F. 1956. Population structure in salt marsh song sparrows. Part I. Environment and annual cycle. Condor 58: 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. A. and R. J. Naiman. 1990. Aquatic patch creation in relation to beaver population trends. Ecology 71: 1617–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, R. 1971. A simple simulation model of dispersal of animals among units of discrete habitat. Oecologia 7: 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1970. Extinction. p. 77–107.In M. Gerstenhaber (ed.) Some Mathematical Problems in Biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, L. E. 1974. Survival of embryos, tadpoles, and adults of the frogsRana aurora aurora andRana pretiosa pretiosa sympatric in southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52: 613–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowcock, L. A. and R. W. Murphy. 1990. Seed dispersal via amphibian vectors: passive transport ofBidens cernua achenes by migrating salamanders, genusAmbystoma. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 104: 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, T. R. and C. P. Rørdam. 1985. Species numbers of vascular plants in relation to area, isolation and age of ponds in Denmark, Oikos 45: 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., C. A. Johnston, and J. C. Kelley, 1988. Alteration of North American streams by beaver. Bio Science 38: 753–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice, M. M. 1937. Studies in the life history of the song sparrow. I. A population study of the song sparrow. Transactions of the Linnean Society of New York 4: 1–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obbard, M. E. and R. J. Brooks. 1980. Nesting migrations of the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentia). Herpetologica 36: 158–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, J. A. 1961. Studies of the local distribution, life history, and population dynamics of the salamander genusDesmognathus in Virginia. Ecological Monographs 31: 189–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. K. Edward Arnold, Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoop, C. R. 1974. Yearly variation in larval survival ofAmbystoma maculatus. Ecology 55: 440–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. H. and K. T. Scribner. 1990. Population genetics of the slider turtle. p. 74–81.In J. W. Gibbons (ed.) Life History and Ecology of the Slider Turtle. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. D. 1977. Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans) Ecology 58: 750–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B. A. and D. D. Murphy. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. American Naturalist 125: 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilen, W. O. and W. E. Frayer. 1990. Status and trends of U.S. wetlands and deepwater habitats. Forest Ecology and Management 33/34: 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, D. O. 1949. Dispersion of small organisms. American Midland Naturalist 35: 1–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. H. and A. A. Allen. 1909. The early breeding habits ofAmbystoma punctatum. American Midland Naturalist 43: 687–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zug, G. R. and P. B. Zug. 1979. The marine toad,Bufo marinus: a natural history resume of native populations. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 284: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbs, J.P. Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13, 25–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160862

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160862

Key Words

Navigation