Skip to main content
Log in

Standing crops and ecology of aquatic invertebrates in agricultural drainwater ponds in California

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined standing crops and ecology of aquatic invertebrates in agricultural drainwater evaporation ponds in California from October 1982 to March 1983 and September 1983 to March 1984. Evaporation ponds supported low diversities but high standing crops of aquatic invertebrates. A water boatman (Trichocorixa reticulata) and a midge (Tanypus grodhausi) were the most abundant invertebrates, constituting 44.9% and 51.4% of total macroinvertebrate biomass. Regression models indicated that of 6 environmental variables measured, only electrical conductivity (EC) and Julian date affected biomass and density of water boatmen. EC was the only significant correlate of midge biomass in evaporation ponds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Benke, A. C. 1984. Secondary production of aquatic insects. p. 289–322.In V. H. Resh and D. M. Rosenberg (eds.). The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borror, D. J., D. M. DeLong, and C. A. Triplehom. 1981. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Fifth edition. Saunders College Publishing, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, H. N. 1990. Use of wetlands in the Tulare Lake Basin by wintering ducks. M. S. Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, D. P. and D. L. Chesemore. 1980. Food habits of pintails,Anas acuta, wintering on seasonally flooded wetlands in the northern San Joaquin Valley, California. California Fish and Game 66: 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr. 1989. Assessment of drainwater evaporation ponds as waterfowl habitat in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Ph.D. Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr. and S. W. Harris. 1987. Feeding ecology of northern pintails and green-winged teal wintering in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 51: 724–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, R. 1988. Water-quality and sediment-chemistry data of drain water and evaporation ponds from Tulare Lake Drainage District, Kings County, CA, March 1985–March 1986. United States Geological Survey Open-file report 87-700, Sacramento, CA, USA.

  • Grodhaus, G. 1967. Identification of chironomid midges commonly associated with waste stabilization lagoons in California. California Vector Views 14: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, B. R. 1982. A master plan for drainage in the San Joaquin Valley. California Agriculture 36: 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, M. E. 1988. Protein costs of the prebasic molt of female mallards. Condor 90: 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howmiller, R. P. 1972. Effects of preservatives on weights of some common macrobenthic invertebrates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101: 743–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J. H., G. R. Hazel, P. Gaffney, and A. W. Nelson. 1977. An evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing agricultural tile drain water for marsh management in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Jones and Stokes Associates, Incorporated, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahrl, W. L. (ed.). 1979. The California water atlas. Calif. Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Los Altos, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimerle, R. A. and N. H. Anderson. 1971. Production and bioenergetic role of the midgeGlyptotendipes barbipes (Staeger) in a waste stabilization lagoon. Limnology and Oceanography 16: 646–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapu, G. L. 1979. Nutrition of female dabbling ducks during reproduction. p. 59–70.In T. A. Bookhout (ed.) Waterfowl and wetlands — an integrated review. Proceedings of the 1977 Symposium, Northcentral Section, The Wildlife Society, Madison, WI, USA.

  • Krapu, G. L. 1981. The role of nutrient reserves in mallard reproduction. Auk 98: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapu, G. L. and G. A. Swanson. 1975. Some nutritional aspects of reproduction in prairie nesting pintails. Journal of Wildlife Management 39: 156–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindegaard, C. and P. M. Jonasson. 1979. Abundance, population dynamics and production of zoobenthos in Lake Myvatn, Iceland. Oikos 32: 202–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, P. S. and P. M. G. Hudspith. 1974. The zoobenthos of Loch Leven, Kinross, and estimates of its production in the sandy littoral area during 1970 and 1971. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinberg 74: 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W. and K. W. Cummins. 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Second edition. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R. 1987. Fall and winter foods of northern pintails on three northern California refuges. Journal of Wildlife Management 51: 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, G. A. and D. E. Johnson. 1984. Analysis of Messy Data, Volume 1: Designed Experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. C., T. Backiel, G. Bretschko, A. Duncan, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowske, Z. Kajak, J. F. Kitchell, P. Larsson, C. Leveque, A. Nauwerck, F. Schiemer, and J. E. Thorpe. 1980. Secondary production. p. 247–340.In E. D. LeCren and R. H. Lowe-McConnell (eds.) The Functioning of Freshwater Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, T. S. and I. Barnes. 1985. Dissolved constituents including selenium in water in the vicinity of Kesterson National Wildlife Refuge and West Grasslands, Fresno and Merced Counties, California. United States Geological Survey, Water Research Investigations Report 85-4220, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, Version 6. Cary, NC, USA.

  • Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods. Seventh edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. 1977. Self-cleaning screen for processing benthic samples. Progressive Fish Culturist 39: 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. 1978a. A simple lightweight core sampler for quantitating waterfowl foods. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 426–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. 1978b. A water column sampler for invertebrates in shallow wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 670–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1961. Master development plan: Kern National Wildlife Refuge. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usinger, R. L. 1956. Aquatic Insects of California, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. B. and G. C. Whipple. 1959. Fresh-water Biology. Second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Euliss, N.H., Jarvis, R.L. & Gilmer, D.S. Standing crops and ecology of aquatic invertebrates in agricultural drainwater ponds in California. Wetlands 11, 179–190 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160848

Key Words

Navigation