Abstract
Six distinct plant zones were identified within a mesohaline tidal marsh in the Cape Fear Estuary, North Carolina. USA. All six vegetative zones were found within an 18-cm portion of the 1.35-m tidal range. Aerial photographs show that these six zones have existed within the marsh for the past 20 years. A monotypicJuncus roemerianus stand occupied soils with the highest salinity porewater (17 ppt), while stands dominated (>90%) by eitherScirpus robustus orTypha angustifolia were found associated with the least saline soil water (7 ppt) in areas of the marsh least flooded by tidal waters.Spartina cynosuroides dominated areas of the marsh at lowest elevations. In general, Eh was highest in theJuncus zone and lowest in theSpartina alterniflora zone. Four of the six vegetative zones represented distinct physical and chemical environments and could be statistically separated via canonical discriminate analyses. We suggest that established vegetation may be an accurate analog for specific hydrogeomorphic conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Adams, D.A. 1963. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina salt marshes. Ecology 44:445–456.
Bertness, M.D. 1991. Zonation ofSpartina patens andSpartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 72:138–148.
Bertness, M.D. and A.M. Ellision, 1987. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh community. Ecological Monographs 57:129–147.
Cooper, A. 1982. The effects of salinity and waterlogging on the growth and cation uptake of salt marsh plants. New Phytologist 90:263–275.
Covin, J.D. and J.B. Zedler. 1988. Nitrogen effects onSpartina foliosa andSalicornia virginica in the salt marsh at Tijuana Estuary, California. Wetlands 8:51–63.
Dardeau, M.R., R.F. Modlin, W.W. Schroeder, and J.P. Stout. 1992. Estuaries. p. 615–744.In C.T. Hackney, S.M. Adams, and W.H. Martin (eds.) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Aquatic Communities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Dawe, N.K. and E.R. White. 1982. Some aspects of the vegetation ecology of the Little Qualicum River estuary, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 60:1447–1459.
de la Cruz, A.A. and C.T. Hackney. 1977. Energy value, elemental composition and belowground biomass of aJuncus tidal marsh. Ecology 58:1165–1170.
de la Cruz, A.A., C.T. Hackney, and N. Bhardwaj. 1989. Seasonal and temporal variations of redozx potential in three North Carolina tidal marsh communities. Wetlands 9:181–190.
DeLaune, R.D., S.R. Pezeshki, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1987. Responses of coastal plants to an increas in submergence and salinity. Journal of Coastal Research 3:535–546.
Earle, J.C. and K.A. Kershaw. 1988. Vegetation patterns in James Bay coastal marshes. III. Salinity and elevation as factors influencing plant zonation. Canadian Journal of Botany 67:2967–2974.
Gilmore, R.G., Jr. and S.C. Snedaker. 1993. Mangrove forests. p. 165–198.In W.H. Martin, S.G. Boyce, and A.C. Echternacht (eds.) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Hackney, C.T. and A.A. de la Cruz. 1978. Changes in interstitial water salinity of a Mississippi tidal marsh. Estuaries 1:185–188.
Hackney, C.T. and G.F. Yelverton. 1990. Effect of human activities and sea level rise on wetland ecosystems in the Cape Fear River estuary, North Carolina, USA. p. 55–63.In D.F. Whigham, R.E. Good, and J. Kvet (eds.) Wetland Ecology and Management: Case Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.
Howes, B.L., J.H. Dacey, and D.D. Goehringer. 1986. Factors controlling the growth form ofSpartina alterniflora: Feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity. Journal of Ecology 74:881–898.
Mardia, K.V., J.T. Kent, and J.M. Bibby. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Mitch, W.J. and J.G. Gosselink. 1986. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.
Nixon, S.W. 1982. The ecology of New England high salt marshes: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-81/55.
Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270.
Penfound, W.T. and E.S. Hathaway. 1938. Plant communities in the marshlands of southeastern Louisiana. Ecological Monographs 8:1–56.
Redfield, A.C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs 42:201–237.
SAS Institute Incorporated. 1989. SAS/STAT Users’s Guide, Version 6 4th Edition. Vol. 1. Cary, NC, USA.
Smart, R.M. and J.W. Barko. 1978. Influence of sediment salinity and nutrients on the physiological ecology of selected marsh plants. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7:487–495.
Snow, A.A. and S.W. Vince. 1984. Plant zonation in an alaskan salt marsh. Journal of Ecology 72:669–684.
Stalter, R. and W.T. Batson. 1969. Transplantation of salt marsh vegetation, Georgetown, South Carolina. Ecology 50:1087–1089.
Teal, 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology 43:614–624.
Valiela, I. and J.M. Teal. 1974. Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation. p. 547–563.In R.J. Reimold (ed.) Ecology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Waisel, Y. 1972. Biology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
Warren, R.S. and W.A. Niering. 1993. Vegetation change on a northeast tidal marsh: interactions of sea level rise and marsh accretion. Ecology 74:76–103.
Zedler, J.B.. 1977. Salt marsh community structure in the Tijuana Estuary, California. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5:39–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hackney, C.T., Brady, S., Stemmy, L. et al. Does intertidal vegetation indicate specific soil and hydrologic conditions. Wetlands 16, 89–94 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160649
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160649