Skip to main content
Log in

“How can we determine the two-bodyt-matrix?”

“Как определяетсяt-Матрица Двух тел?”

  • Published:
Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae

Abstract

We start with an assumed shape for the wavefunction of the ground state of the two-nucleon system. This wavefunction gives us the residue of thet-matrix at the bound-state pole-and using the unitary pole approximation (UPA) provides a good extrapolation procedure for other off-shell values of thet-matrix. (E. Harms has verified the accuracy of the UPA using the anti-bound state for theReid soft-core singlet potential.)

We now face the problem: what bound-state wavefunction should we assume? In the next several years it should be possible to determine the deuteron wavefunction experimentally, by measuring elastic electron-deuteron scattering from polarized deuterons, or equivalently by measuring the polarization of the recoil deuteron. (The wavefunction at large neutron-proton separation should also be checked by using it in the Schrödinger equation to give a local potential which should agree well with that for one pion exchange.) Angular distribution measurements provide a separation of the deuteron form factor into a charge form factor and a magnetic moment form factor. Polarization measurements separate the charge form factor into a monopole form factorG 0 and a quadrupole form factorG 2.T. Brady has found that values ofG 2(q) at momentum transfersq of order 3F −1 are quite sensitive to the percentage ofD-state (p D) in the deuteron. At present the lack of knowledge ofpD is the main source of uncertainty in calculation of the energy of the trinucleon.

Резюме

Сначала предлагаем определенную форму волновой функции основного состояния системы двух ядер. Эта волновая функция дает остатокt-матрицы в полюсе связанного состояния, и использование приближения единичного полюса дает хорошую экстраполяцию для значенийt-матрицы в неэнергетической поверхности. Сейчас возникает проблема, какую волнову функцию связанного состояния мы должны подобрать? В течение следующих лет становится возможным экспериментальным путем определить волновую функцию дейтерия путем измерения упругого рассеяния электрона и действия в поляризованном дейтерии или аналогичным путем измерить поляризацию отраженного дейтерия.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Levinger et al., Phys. Rev.,179, 926, 1969.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev.,95, 1628, 1954.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Harms, Phys. Rev.,C1, 1667, 1970.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Lomon, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys.,4, 28, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Feshbach andA. K. Kerman, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys.,2, 22 and2, 78, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev.,C2, 2439, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Baranger et al., Nucl. Phys.,A138, 1, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Van Dijk andM. Razavy, Nucl. Phys.,A159, 161, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. G. Fuda, Nucl. Phys.,A130, 155, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. G. Fuda, Phys. Rev.,C3, 55 andC3, 485, 1971.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. K. L. Kowalski et al., Phys. Rev.,C3, 1146, 1971.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. I. Haftel, Phys. Rev. Lett.,25, 120, 1970.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. R. V. Reid, Annals Phys. (N. Y.),50, 411, 1968.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. A. Malfliet andJ. A. Tjon, Annals Phys., (N. Y.)61, 425, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Lovelace, Phys. Rev.,135B, 1225, 1964.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. G. Fuda, Nucl. Phys.,A116, 83, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Harms andL. Laroze, Nucl. Phys.,A160, 449, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Burnap et al., Phys. Lett.,33B, 337, 1970.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. P. Kok et al., Nucl. Phys.,A122, 684, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. D. Brayshaw, Phys. Rev.,C3, 35, 1971.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Brady, Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1969.

  22. S. Bhatt et al., Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc.,16, 559, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. H. MacGregor et al., Phys. Rev.,182, 174, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. R. Mongan, Phys. Rev.,178, 1597, 1969.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. N. K. Glendening andG. Kramer, Phys. Rev.,126, 2159, 1962.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Mehrotra andK. S. Gupta, Phys. Rev.,D1, June 15, 1970.

  27. R. R. Wilson andJ. S. Levinger, Ann. Revs. Nucl. Sci.,14, 135, 1964.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Prepost et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.,21, 1271, 1968.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gourdin andPiketti, Nuovo Cim., 1963;Gourdin, book on electron scattering, 1964.

  30. A. D. Jackson andJ. A. Tjon, Phys. Lett.,32B, 9, 1970.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. A. Tjon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.,25, 540, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Blancenbecler andJ. V. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D. in press, 1971.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Travel supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levinger, J.S. “How can we determine the two-bodyt-matrix?”. Acta Physica 33, 135–150 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158002

Keywords

Navigation