Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment of non-fluorescent electromechanical endocardial mapping compared with biplane left ventricular contrast angiography

  • original article
  • Published:
Netherlands Heart Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of global LV function assessment by electromechanical endocardial mapping (EEM). The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between global left ventricular (LV) function measured by EEM and biplane left ventricular contrast angiography (LVA) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods. Thirty-seven patients underwent LVA and EEM during routine coronary angiography four months after primary percutaneous intervention for STEMI. Global LV function parameters were available from both techniques in all patients. LVA was regarded as reference standard.

Results. All procedures were carried out without adverse events. Average age was 55±10 years and 84% were male. EEM showed an overestimation of end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) of 6.5 ml and 25.5 ml, respectively. Correlation (r) was 0.84 (p<0.001) for EDV and 0.74 (p<0.001) for ESV. Average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by EEM was 17.2% point (±11.3% point) lower compared with LVA (r=0.69, p<0.001).

Conclusion. Although global functional parameters by EEM correlated well with LVA, the relatively large differences in terms of absolute values for ventricular volumes and LVEF render the two techniques non-interchangeable for global LV-function-data. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:72–77.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Vleuten PA, Rasoul S, Huurnink W, Van der Horst IC, Slart RH, Reiffers S, et al. The importance of left ventricular function for long-term outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moise A, Bourassa MG, Theroux P, Taeymans Y, Pasternac A, Campeau L, et al. Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:941–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB, Fisher LD, Holmes DR Jr, Chaitman BR, et al. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1994;90:2645–57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perin EC, Dohmann HF, Borojevic R, Silva SA, Sousa AL, Mesquita CT, et al. Transendocardial, autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for severe, chronic ischemic heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107:2294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beeres SL, Bax JJ, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Fibbe WE, van der Wall EE, et al. Intramyocardial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in patients with chronic myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1094–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schachinger V, Erbs S, Elsasser A, Haberbosch W, Hambrecht R, Holschermann H, et al. Intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1210–21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Segers VF, Lee RT. Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease. Nature. 2008;451:937–42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmann M, Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Menke A, Arseniev L, Hertenstein B, et al. Monitoring of bone marrow cell homing into the infarcted human myocardium. Circulation. 2005;111: 2198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smits PC, van Geuns RJ, Poldermans D, Bountioukos M, Onderwater EE, Lee CH, et al. Catheter-based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure: clinical experience with sixmonth follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:2063–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vale PR, Losordo DW, Milliken CE, McDonald MC, Gravelin LM, Curry CM, et al. Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of catheter-based myocardial gene transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis using left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001;103:2138–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tio RA, Tkebuchava T, Scheuermann TH, Lebherz C, Magner M, Kearny M, et al. Intramyocardial gene therapy with naked DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor improves collateral flow to ischemic myocardium. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:2953–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grothues F, Wolfram O, Fantoni C, Boenigk H, Gotte A, Tempelmann C, et al. Volume measurement by CARTO compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Europace. 2006;8:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Langenhove G, Hamburger JN, Smits PC, Albertal M, Onderwater E, Kay IP, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with a nonfluoroscopic endoventricular three-dimensional mapping technique. Am Heart J. 2000;140:596–602.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hirsch A, Nijveldt R, Van der Vleuten PA, Biemond BJ, Doevendans PA, van Rossum AC, et al. Intracoronary infusion of autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells or peripheral mononuclear blood cells after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the HEBE trial - a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2006;152:434–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Van der Vleuten.

Additional information

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen and the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute Netherlands, the Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, ES., Van der Vleuten, P.A., Jessurun, G.A.J. et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment of non-fluorescent electromechanical endocardial mapping compared with biplane left ventricular contrast angiography. NHJL 18, 72–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091741

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091741

Navigation