Skip to main content
Log in

Is there enough rationale in randomised controlled trials on distant healing?

  • Letter to the Editors
  • Published:
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ernst E (2003) Distant healing — an “update” of a systematic review. Wien Klin Wochenschr 115: 241–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Astin JA, Harkness E, Ernst E (2000) The efficacy of “distant healing”: a systematic review of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 132: 903–910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leibovici L (2001) Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 323: 1450–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leibovici L (2002) Author’s comments. eBMJ 12 (March)

  5. Barrett S (2003) Implausible research: how much is enough? Wien Klin Wochenschr 115: 218–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altmann DG (1994) The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 308: 283–284

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Röggia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röggia, G., Fortunat, S. Is there enough rationale in randomised controlled trials on distant healing?. Wien Klin Wochenschr 115, 607 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040458

Keywords

Navigation