Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The rotation model is not sustainable

  • Forum
  • Reform of the Decision-making Rules of the ECB Council in View of EMU Enlargement
  • Published:
Intereconomics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. See Wim Duisenberg: ECB Press Conference, February 6, 2003, Frankfurt (www.ecb.int).

  2. See for instance D. Gros, M. Castelli, J. Jimeno, T. Mayer, N. Thygesen: The Euro at 25, Special Report of the CEPS Macroeconomic Policy Group, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Handelsblatt, February 5, 2003, No. 25, p. 24 (“Geplantes EZB-Modell stößt europaweit auf Kritik”).

  4. See Ellen Meade, Nathan Sheets: Regional Influences on US Monetary Policy: Some Implications for Europe, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers No. 721, February 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hohenheim, Germany

    Ansgar Belke

Authors
  1. Ansgar Belke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belke, A. The rotation model is not sustainable. Intereconomics 38, 119–124 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031761

Keywords

Search

Navigation