Abstract
This paper argues that in mainstream economics the concept of entrepreneurship is imposed by the theoretical framework adopted in order to justify the source of profits. In contrast, in Marx’s analysis there is a consistent theory of profit which inevitably leads to a specific theory of entrepreneurship. (JEL: B10, B14, B21)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barreto H., The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan, 1989.
Blaug M., Economic Theory in Retrospect, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
—, Economic History and the History of Economics, New York: University Press, 1987.
Ebner A., “Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: From Classical Political Economy to Economic Sociology”,Journal of Economic Studies, 2005,32(3), pp. 256–74.
Hawley F.B., Enterprise and the Productive Process, New York: Knickerbocker Press, 1907.
Heilbroner R., The Nature and Logic of Capitalism, New York: Norton, 1985.
Ioannidis S.,Competition, Market and Democracy: A Critique to New-Austrians Economic Theory, Athens: Karagiorga’s Foundation, 1993 (in Greek).
Knight F.H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
Marshall A. [1890], Principles of Economics, London: MacMillan, 1959.
Marx K. [1867],Capital, Vol. I, New York: International Publishers, 1967.
— [1869],Theories of Surplus Value, Parts I, II, and III, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1971.
— [1894],Capital, Vol. III, New York: International Publishers, 1981.
Mill J.S. [1848], Principles of Political Economy, London: Routledge & Kegan, 1965.
Naples M. I. andAslanbeigui N., “What Does Determine the Profit Rate? The Neoclassical Theories Presented in Introductory Textbooks”,Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996,20(1), pp. 53–71.
Obrinsky M., Profit Theory & Capitalism, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.
Pesciarelli E., “Smith, Bentham, and the Development of Contrasting Ideas on Entrepreneurship”,History of Political Economy, 1989,21(3), pp. 238–56.
Pierson G. N., Principles of Economics, London: MacMillan, 1902.
Prendergast R., “Schumpeter, Hegel and the Vision of Development”,Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005,30(2), pp. 253–75.
Rosdolsky R., The Making of Marx’s Capital, London: Pluto, 1977.
Rosenberg N., Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Say J.B. [1803], Treatise on Political Economy, New York: C. Princep, 1964.
Schiller B.R., The Economy Today, New York: McGraw Hill, 2000.
Schumpeter J.A.[1911], The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
—, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1947.
—, History of Economic Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954.
Shaikh A., “The Power of Profit”,Social Research, 2004,71(2), pp. 1–12.
Smith A. [1776], Wealth of Nations, New York: Modern Library, 1965.
Spencer M.H., Contemporary Microeconomics, New York: Worth Publishers, 1990.
Walras L. [1874], Eléments of Pure Economics, London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.
Walsh V. andGram H., Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsaliki, P.V. Marx on entrepreneurship: A note. RISEC 53, 592–602 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029765
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029765