Skip to main content
Log in

Education reform and competency-based education

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The core purpose of this paper is to describe a new educational paradigm as well as possible directions and tasks for education reform in the 21st century. The present-day education system has failed to nurture the kind of creative people who can play leading roles in development or to produce citizens of a good character and democratic tendencies. We need to look at education from the standpoint of expanding the totality of possibilities for national development. The current educational system of Korea can be characterized as one of “manpower-centered education. ” In this system, education functions to produce the human resources needed by the nation, and there is a strong belief in the classification and selection of high-quality human capital via the school system. We can think of an educational model that is parallel to the current system of manpower classification and selection and call it “competency-based education. ” In this model, the identification of individual ability, talent, and aptitude is deemed to be the most important, and the key task of education is self-actualization through recognition and cultivation of such talents and abilities. What educational values should be pursued within a new competency-based paradigm? First, we can reduce the relative weight of subject-centered education and introduce a competency-based curriculum in order to teach key competences for life. Second, new intelligence theories must be introduced into education in order to foster the development of students' talents, aptitudes, and potentials. Third, we can make use of positive psychology, which is a newly emerging field, the core concept of which is the belief that happiness in life depends on one's ability to develop and maintain positive feelings and emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Moon, Y. L. (1993). We need a shift in educational models,Criticism Quarterly, 35(3), 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y. L. (1994). The direction and strategies of education reform in Korea,Criticism Quarterly, 36(1), 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y. L. (2006, September).Development and Prospect of Positive Psychology. Paper presented at the M. Seligman invitation seminar organized by the Korean Counseling Center, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, K. (2006, October).The meaning of 'competency' in school education and its implications for curriculum, Paper presented at the Fall 2006 meeting of the Korean Society for the Study of Education, Seoul, Korea.

Supplementary References

  • Brundertt, M. (2000). The question of competence: The origins, strengths and inadequacies of a leadership training paradigm,School Leadership & Management, 20(3), 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne J. G. (1993). The competence movement: issues, stakeholders and prospects,Personnel Review, 22(6), 7- 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cira, D. J., & Benjamin, E. (1998). Competency-based pay: A conception evolution,Compensation and Benefits Review, 30(5), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, A. (1989). Managers’ competence: Rethoric, reality and Research,Personnel Review, 28(6), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M. (1983). A critical analysis of competency-based systems in adult education,Adult Education Quarterly, 33(3), 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlene Russ-Eft. (1995). Defining Competence: A critique,Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(4), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, T. N., & McGuire, D. (2001). Competencies and workplace learning: Some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality,Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(4), 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzeda, M. M. (2005). In competence we trust?: Addressing conceptual ambiguity,Journal of management development, 24(6). 530–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, T. (1993). Competence, knowledge and education,Journal of Philosophy of Education, 27(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., & Moore, R. (1995). Appropriating competence: The competency movement, the new right and the culture change project,British Journal of Education and Work, 8(2), 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence,Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27- 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., & Staines, H. (1993). Managerial competencies in small firms,Journal of Management Development, 13(7), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1993). Testing for competency rather than for intelligence,American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, P. A. (1989). Models for HRD practice,Training and Development Journal, 43(9), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, P. A. (1997). Competencies: The next generation,Training and Development Journal, 51(5), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirable, R. (1997). Everything you wanted to know about competency modeling,Training and Development, 51(8), 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, N. (1991). The trouble with competence,Cambridge Journal of Education, 21(3), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002).Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo): Theoretical and conceptual foundations: Strategy Paper.

  • Rothwell, W. J., & Lindholm, J. E. (1999). Competency identification, modeling and assessment in the USA,International Journal of Training and Development, 3(2), 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippman, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batttista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., et al. (2000). The practice of competency modeling,Personnel Psychology, 53, 703–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993a).Models for superior performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993b).Competency at work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, R. A., & Michael, S. O. (1999). Emerging competency methods for the future.Human, Resource Management, 38(3), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Payne, T. (1998).Competency based recruitment and selection: A practical guide. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. (1982). Job competencies: Can they help you design better training?,Training, 19(5), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-lin Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, Yl. Education reform and competency-based education. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 8, 337–341 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029267

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029267

Key words

Navigation