Skip to main content
Log in

Response surface approach to optimize the pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding parameters of Ti−6Al−4V titanium alloy

  • Published:
Metals and Materials International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium alloy (Ti−6Al-−4V) is very widely used in the fabrication of advanced industrial equipment, combat vehicles, gas turbines, spacecraft and so on. The preferred welding process for titanium alloy is gas tungsten arc (GTA) welding due to its comparatively easier applicability and better economy. However, welding of titanium alloy leads to grain coarsening at the fusion zone and the heat-affected zone, and this often results in inferior weld mechanical properties and poor resistance to hot cracking. Hence, in this investigation an attempt has been made to refine the fusion zone microstructure of titanium alloy by using a pulsed current GTA welding process instead of a constant current GTA welding process. Further mathematical models were developed by means of a response surface method, which enabled the process parameters to be optimized to achieve a minimum grain size and maximum hardness in GTA welding of the alloy under study. The parameter optimization involved the use of a response surface, contour plots and Kuhn-Tucker conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ravi Vishnu,Weld World 35, 214 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Gokhale, A. A. Tzavaras, H. D. Brody, G. M. Ecer, G. J. Abbaschian, and S. A. David,TMS-AIME, p. 223, Warrendale (1983).

  3. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, A. A. Gokhale, and K. Prasad Rao,J. Mater. Sci. 32, 4117 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Yamamoto,Welding international 7, 456 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Prasad Rao,Recent Trends in Advanced Material Processing, p. 176, Annamalainagar (2001).

  6. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, A. A. Gokhale, and K. Prasad Rao,J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 14, 61 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Senthil Kumar, V. Balasubramanian, and M. Y. Sanavullah,Indian Welding Society 3, 29 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. E. P. Box, W. H. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter,Statistics for Experimenters, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1978).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. D. C. Montgomery,Design and Analysis of Experiments, p. 3, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1991).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. T. B. Barker,Quality by Experimental Design, ASQC Quality press, Marcel Dekker (1985).

  11. S. N. Chary,Theory and Problems in Production and Operations Management, Tata Mc-Graw Hill Publications, New Delhi (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ravindran, Phillips and Solberg,Operations Research, Principles and Practice, John wiley and Sons, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Balasubramanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balasubramanian, M., Jayabalan, V. & Balasubramanian, V. Response surface approach to optimize the pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding parameters of Ti−6Al−4V titanium alloy. Met. Mater. Int. 13, 335–344 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027891

Keywords

Navigation