Abstract
This paper investigates the formation and establishment of lifelong learning support systems in six Asian countries, including Korea, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong(SAR), Thailand, and the Philippines. The countries included in this research are quite diverse and unique in their basic characteristics. Despite the divergent values, systems, and social roles, since the 1990s, the basic ideas and trends have been toward a somewhat integrated model in which each component of the system was geared to function for serving the global knowledge economy. In this paper, the process of recent lifelong learning system development in the selected six Asian countries was traced in two ways: global aspects and local peculiarity. I argued in this paper that the cases in Asia mostly follows the ‘global trends’, especially with the ‘business mind’ of global capitalism. I also suggest that Asian experiences can provide several distinctive characteristics rarely observed elsewhere: new role in mitigating diploma-disease, building centralized supporting system between central and local governments, the impact of colonial legacy, unbalance between HRD and humane-orientations, and preservation of the emphasis of adult basic education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberici, A. (1998). Holford, et al. (eds.)International perspective on lifelong learning, London: Kogan Page.
Atchoarena, D. & Hite, S. (2001). ifelong learning policies in low development contexts: An African perspective. In D. Aspin, J. Cahpman, M. Hatton and Y. Sawano (eds.),International handbook of lifelong learning. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baptiste, I. (2001). ducating lone worlves: Pedagogical implications of human capital theory.Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3).
Coombs, P. (1982).World educational crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, C. (1996). uidance and cohenrence in flexible learning. In P. Raggatt, R. Edwards and N. Small (eds.),The learning society. London and New York: The Open University.
DECS Bureau of Nonformal Education (1993).Nonformal education vision and mission at the threshold of the 21st century, 6. Manila: DECS.
Delors, J. (1996).Learning: The treasure within. Paris: UNESCO.
Gelphi, E. (1985).Lifelong education and international relation. London: Croom Helm.
Han, S. (2000).orean lifelong learning: A contested terrain.Korean Lifelong Education Journal,6(1).
Han, S. (2001).Lifelong learning and learning ecology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
Holford, J., Jarvis, P., & Griffin, C. (eds.) (1998).International perspective on lifelong learning. London: Kogan Page.
Hong Kong government (2001).Investing in our human capital.
Korsgaard, O. (1997). The worlds of the hand and of the mind. In S. Walters (Ed.),Globalization, adult education & training. London and New York: ZED books.
Lengrand, P. (1979). Prospects of lifelong education. In A. J. Cropley (Ed.),Lifelong education: A stocktaking. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
Lengrand, P. (1986).Areas of learning basic to lifelong education. New York: Pergamon Press.
OECD (1996).Lifelong learning for all: Meeting of the education committee at Ministerial level 16-17. January, 1996. Paris: OECD.
Okamoto, K. (1994).Lifelong learning movement in Japan: Strategies, practices and challenges. Tokyo, Mimeo.
Okamoto, K. (2001). Lifelong learning and the leisure-oriented society: The development and challenges in the Far East. Aspin, D. et al. (eds.),International handbook of lifelong learning. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
ONEC (1999).Education in Thiland 1999. Bangkok: Office of the National Commission Office of the Prime Minister Kingdom of Thiland.
OPM (1999).National Education Act of B.E. 2542(1999). Bangkok: Office of the National Education Commission. Office of the Prime Minister, Kingdom of Thailand.
Romulo (1989). Nonformal education thrusts. In Sutaria, Guerrero, and Casta, Guerrero, (ed.),Philippine Education Vision and Perspectives, pp. 248–252.
Roth, J. (2001).Contemporary issues in human resource development: Implications for educational administration. Paper presented at the Korean
Society for Educational Administration, Seoul, Korea, Oct 5–6, 2001.
Trievellato, P. (1996). Japan as a learning society. An overall view by a european sociologist. In Coffied, Frank (Ed),A national strategy for lifelong learning. Papers presented at a conference titled “Research on lifelong learning: Implications for policy and practice.” Newcastle, England, November 25–27, 1996.
Tuijnman, A. (2001). ecent development in meeting specific adult learning needs: International perspectives. Paper presented at the OECD-KRIVET International conference on adult learning policies, Seoul, Korea, December, 5–7, 2001.
Wain, K. (1993). ifelong education and adult education — the state of the theory.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 12(2), pp. 85–99.
http://stednet.sei.dost.gov.ph/
http://www.decs.gov.ph
http://www.deped.gov.ph/lmis/phil-lmis.htm
http://www. fapenet.org/bnfe/propro.htm
http://www.info.gov.hk/emb/eng/manpower/index.html
http://www.unesco.org/education/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, S. Creating systems for lifelong learning in asia. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 2, 85–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026293
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026293