Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The dynamics of educational reforms in the Philippine basic and higher education sectors

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explains the current reforms in basic and higher education in the Philippines. Specifically, internal and external enablers in the educational environment were reviewed as justifications of the reforms both at the national level as well at the individual teacher. The reforms were treated in the light of four perspectives in the measurement of quality namely; the reputational view, the resources view, the outcomes view and the value-added view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asian Development Bank, Philippines (1996).Philippine education in the 21 st century. The 1998 Philippine education sector study. Pasig City: Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, Jr. R. V. D., Kauchak, N. A., Crow, S., & Hobbs, D. (1997). Professional development schools: Catalyst for teacher and school change.Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Elementary Education (1982).PRODED Primer. Manila: Department of Education, Culture and Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Secondary Education (1993).Manual of information. Manila: Department of Education, Culture and Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, N. M. (1987). Education and national reconstruction.UNITAS, 60(3), 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong Cheng, Y. (2000). A CMI-triplization paradigm for reforming education in the new millennium.The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(4), 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on higher education, Republic of the Philippines. CHED Memorandum Order No. 32. 2001 Grant of autonomy and deregulated status to selected higher education institutions with benefits accruing thereto. Pasig City: Commission on Higher Education.

  • Commission on higher education, Republic of the Philippines (1999).CY 1999 Annual Report. Pasig City: Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on higher education (2000).Executive Summary. Long Term Higher Education Development Plan 2001– 2010. Pasig City: Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceicao, P., & Joly, P. B. (2001).The production of technological knowledge: New issues in a learning economy. The globalizing learning economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional commission on education (1993).Making education work. Quezon City: Congressional Oversight Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custodio, L. J. (1999). Envisioning the future in the perspective of education.UST Journal of Graduate Research, 26(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996).Learning: The treasure within. report of the international commission of education for the 21 st Century. France: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (2001).Briefing materials 2002 budget hearing. Pasig City: Department of Education Culture and Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Culture and Sports. (1999).1999 Annual report. Pasig City: Department of Education Culture and Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Culture and Sports (2001).Fact sheet. Pasig City: Department of Education Culture and Sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P., & Henshel, P. (2000).Supporting community involvement in the digital age, civic responsibility and higher education. American Council on Education. Series on Higher Education. Phoenix: The Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (2001). Today’s universities: responsive, resilient, or rigid?Higher Education Policy, 14(1), 241- 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estioko, L. SVD. (1994).History of education: A Filipino perspective. Manila: Logos Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R. R. (1999). The modernization of higher education in Mexico.Higher Education Policy, 12(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallak, J. (1995). Educational challenges of the 21st century: InThe vision of quality, educational challnges in the World Community of the 21 st century (pp. 8–15). Quezon City: SEAMEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtta, S., & Malkki, P. (2000). Response of finnish higher education to the national information society.Higher Education Policy, 13(1), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasim, A. (1995).Quality education. In The Malaysian vision and experience, educational challenges in the world community of the 21 st century (pp. 43–56). Quezon City: SEAMEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin D. (Ed.). (1980).A century of education in the Philippines: 1861–1961. Manila: Philippine Historical Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J. R. (1996). Educational reforms in the 21st century.UST Journal of Graduate Research.24(2), 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolledo, J. (1995).The education act of the Philippines annotated. Manila: National Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebres, B. F. (1998, May).Quality assurance in higher education. Paper presented at the National Centennial Congress on Higher Education on Higher Education in the Philippines: From the Revolution to the 21st Century, Manila, Philippines.

  • Nuttman, C., & Cheong, D. (1995). Education policy- A global or local agenda? Reflections on Brunei Darussalam. InEducational Challenges in the World Community of the 21 st Century (pp. 173–189). Quezon City: SEAMEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. C. (1988).Curriculum: foundations, principles and issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidential Commission on Educational Reform (2000).Philippine agenda for educational reform: The PCER report. Pasig City: Presidential Commission on Educational Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schargel, F. P. (1991). Promoting quality in education.Vocational Educational Journal, 66(8), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. (1999). Manila: National Bookstore.

  • The Manila Times (1994).World Education Report. Manila: The Manila Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorens, J. (1996). Role and mission of the university as the dawn of the 21st century.Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1994). Managerialism and the academic profession: the case of England.Higher Education Policy, 7(2), 11- 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University Council (1998).Report: A vision for universities in the 21 st century and reform measures: To be distinctive universities in a competitive environment. Tokyo: University Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wende, M. C. (2001). Internationalization olicies: About new trends and contrasting paradigms.Higher Education Policy, 14(1), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walshok, M. L. (2000).Knowledge without boundaries: What America’s research universities can do for the economy, the workplace and the community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan B. de Guzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Guzman, A.B. The dynamics of educational reforms in the Philippine basic and higher education sectors. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 4, 39–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025551

Keywords

Navigation