Skip to main content
Log in

Unter- und mittelkambrische Porifera (Chancelloriida und Hexactinellida)

  • Published:
Paläontologische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Zusammenfassung

Folgende Taxa werden (ganz überwiegend anhand isolierter Nadeln) behandelt: Klasse HeteractinidaHinde 1887. Ordnung ChancelloriidaWalcott 1920. Fam. ChancelloriidaeWalcott 1920.Chancelloria maroccana n. sp.Chancelloria sp. indet.Eiffelia? hispanica n. sp. Fam. Archiasterellidae n. fam.Allonnia tripodophora Doré & Reid 1965. GenusArchiasterella n. gen.Archiasterella pentactina n. sp.Archiasterella antiqua n. sp. Klasse HexactinellidaSchmidt 1870.Protospongia? sp. A, sp. B.Calcihexactina franconica n. gen.,n. sp. Fragliche Porifera-Reste (Problematikum A, B).

Die Chancelloriida (hier zur Ordnung erhoben) unterscheiden sich von allen anderen Schwämmen in der Struktur der Nadeln: Dünne Kalk-Wände umschließen sehr weite «Achsen-Höhlen», die vielleicht mit Spongin gefüllt waren und von denen aus «Basal-Poren» die Nadel-Wand durchbrechen. Grundlegendes Symmetrie-Element der Chancelloriida-Nadel ist der «Archiaster», der bei den Archiasterellidae allein, bei den Chancelloriidae in Kombination mit einem Vertikal-Strahl auftritt. Die Zahl der Strahlen im Archiaster wechselt, kann aber innerhalb der Arten konstant sein. Von der Chancelloriida-Nadel kann die Symmetrie der Nadeln aller bekannten Schwamm-Klassen abgeleitet werden, einschließlich jener der Hexactinellida (4-strahliger Archiaster — Stauractin). Kambrische Hexactinellida hatten, wie die Chancelloriida, noch Kalziumkarbonat als Material der Nadeln. Die Chancelloriida treten mit mehreren Gattungen bereits im tiefen Unter-Kambrium auf und könnten sehr wohl die Gruppe sein, von der die meisten späteren Schwämme abzuleiten sind.

Summary

The taxa described (mostly from isolated spicules) or discussed (Chapter F) are listed above.

The Chancelloriida (treated as an order, the author of which has to beWalcott) are characterized by a peculiar structure (B 1): Each ray consists of a separate «axial cavity» enclosed by a thin calcareous wall and opening towards the base of the spicule through a «basal pore». It is thought that the axial cavities might have been filled with spongin and that strands of this material might have connected the spicules of the sponge by way of the basal pores, thus giving it resistance to shallow water conditions in spite of its seemingly fragile structure (B 3). The feature common to the spicules of all Chancelloriida is termed «archiaster» (B 2). This may be represented alone (Archiasterellidae) or combined with a vertical ray (Chancelloriidae). The number of rays in the archiaster varies within the whole group, but may be fixed for certain species. The different symmetries of existing classes of sponges may have originated in different forms of the spicule of Chancelloriida (C). This is also true of hexactinellids: A four-rayed archiaster would have the symmetry of the stauract. Middle Cambrian sponges of theProtospongia type possibly incorporated octacts (Protospongia? sp. A) and had spicules consisting of calzite (P.? sp. B,Calcihexactina franconica n. gen., n. sp.). Chancelloriida first occur in the low Lower Cambrian (D) and they might well represent the ancestors of most later sponges. Differences in organisation between the latter may partly be explained by retainment of the shallow water environment of Chancelloriida or by a change to deeper, less agitated water (Hexactinellida) that commenced even in Cambrian time (E).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

G. Schriften

  • Bedford, R. &Bedford, J. (1936): Further notes on Cyathospongia (Archaeocyathi) and other organisms from the lower Cambrian of Beltana, South Australia. — Mem. Kyancutta Mus.,3, 21–26, Taf. 21–26; Kyancutta (S-Australien).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann, J. G. (1886): Die Versteinerung des Cambrischen Schichtensystems der Insel Sardinien nebst vergleichenden Untersuchungen über analoge Versteinerungen aus anderen Ländern. 1. Abtheils. — Verh. kaiserl. Leop.-Carol. Deutsch. Akad. Naturforscher,51, Nr. 1, 148 S., 33 Taf.; Halle a. d. S.

  • Boudda, A. (1969): Zur geologischen Kartierung 1∶25 000 im Gebiet von Ounein (Massif ancien du Haut-Atlas, Marokko). —S. 1–52, 50 Abb., und Karten. — Diplom-Arbeit (unveröff.); Würzburg.

  • Chapman, F. (1940): On a new genus of sponges from the Cambrian of the Flinders Range, South Australia. — Trans. roy. Soc. South Australia,46 (1), 101–108, Taf. 9-12; Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doré, F. &Reid, R. E. (1965):Allonnia tripodophora nov. gen., nov. sp., nouvelle Eponge du Cambrien inférieur de Carteret (Manche). — C. r. Séances Soc. géol. France,1965 (1), 20–21, Abb. 1; Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finks, R. M. (1960): Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region. The siliceous sponges. — Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist.,120 (1), 1–160, 77 Abb., 50 Taf.; New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germann, K. (1965): Die Technik des Folienabzuges und ihre Ergänzung durch Anfärbemethoden. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,121, 293–306; Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. T. (1920): Scottish national Antarctic expedition 1902–04: Cambrain organic remains from a dredging in the Wedell Sea. — Trans. r. Soc. Edinburgh,52, 681–714, Taf. 1–7; Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W. & Fritz-Gaertner, R. (1878): On the structure ofAstraeospongia meniscus. — 30th Ann. Rep. New York State Mus. Natur. Hist., 111–116, Taf. 3; New York.

  • Hinde, G. J. (1887): A monograph of the British fossil Sponges. 1. Sponges of the Paleozoic and Jurassic strata. I, 1–92, Taf. 1–8; London.

  • Laubenfels, M. W. De (1955): Porifera. — In:Moore, R. C.: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, E. 21–112, Abb. 14–89; Lawrence/Kansas.

  • Lokke, D. H. (1964): Calcareous spicules inTalpaspongia clavata R. H. King, lower Permian of Concho Country, Texas. — J. Paleont.,38 (4), 778–781, 3 Abb.; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, F. (1961): Das Kambrium Spaniens. Teil I: Stratigraphie. — Akad. Wiss. Lit., Abh. math.-naturw. Kl., Nr. 6, 1–216, Abb. 1–48, Tab. 1–12; Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, V. (1969): Lithologische Untersuchung des Kambriums im Frankenwald (Bayern). — Geol. Jb.,86, 13 Abb. u. Tab., Taf. 1–8; Hannover (im Druck).

  • Meer Mohr, C. G. Van Der (1969): The stratigraphy of the Cambrian Láncara formation between the Luna river and the Esla river in the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain. — Leidse Mededel.,43, 233–316, 61 Abb., 4 Taf.; Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öpik, A. A. (1956): Cambrian Geology of the Northern territory. — El sistema cámbrico, su paleogeografia y el problema de su base, II, S. 25–54, 2 Abb. — XX. Congr. geol. internat.; México.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961): The geology and paleontology of the headwaters of the Burke River, Queensland. — Bur. miner. Resources, Geol. Geophys. Bull.,53, 1–249, Abb. 1–59, Taf. 1–24; Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. E. H. (1957): On Hexactinellida, «Hyalospongea» and the classification of siliceous sponges. — J. Paleont.,31, 282–286; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1959): Occurrence ofChancelloria Walcott in the Comley limestone. — Geol. Mag.,96, 261–262; London.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1963): Hexactinellida or Hyalospongea. — J. Paleont.,37 (1), 232–243; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1967):Hyalostelia Zittel and the Heteractinellida. — Geol. Mag.,104 (4), 398 bis 399; London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968):Hyalostelia smithii (Young & Young) and the sponge genusHyalostelia Zittel (Class Hexactinellida). — J. Paleont.,42, 1243–1248, Taf. 162; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, W. E. (1968): Schwammreste aus dem oberen Ordovizium von Estland und Schweden. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont., Mh.,1968 733–744, Abb. 1–3; Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezvoj, P. D., Žuravleva, I. T. & Koltun, V. M. (1962): Tip Porifera. Gubki. — InOrlov, Ju. A.: Osnovy Paleontologii, Gubki, Archeociaty, Kišečnopolostnye, Červi, 17–74, 107 Abb., 8 Taf.; Moskau.

  • Rietschel, S. (1968): Die Octactinellida und ihnen verwandte paläozoische Kalkschwämme (Porifera, Calcarea). — Paläont. Z.,42, 13–32, Abb. 1–4, Taf. 1; Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, J. K. (1967): A new polyactinal sponge from the Antelope Valley formation (Ordovician) in the Toquima Range, Nevada. — J. Paleont.,41 (2), 511–515, 4 Abb.; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. A. (1964): Late middle cambrian faunas from western Utah. — J. Paleont.,38 (3), 510–566, 4 Abb., Taf. 79–92; Tulsa/Okla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sdzuy, K. (1955): Cystoideen aus den Leimitz-Schiefern (Tremadoc). — Senckenbergiana lethaea,35, 269–276, Abb. 1–5, Taf. 1; Frankfurt a. Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1960): Das Alter derDolerolenus-Fauna. — Geol. Rdsch.,49, 108–110; Stuttgart.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1962): Trilobiten aus dem Unter-Kambrium der Sierra Morena (S-Spanien). — Senckenbergiana lethaea,43, 181–229, Abb. 1–4, Taf. 18–23; Frankfurt a. Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1964): Das Kambrium des Frankenwaldes. 1: Erforschungsgeschichte, Vorkommen und Stratigraphie. — Senckenbergiana lethaea,45, 201–221, Abb. 1–3; Frankfurt a. Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968): Trilobites del Cámbrico Medio de Asturias. — Trabajos Geol.,1, 77–133, Abb. 1, Taf. 1–10; Oviedo.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1969): Biostratigrafia de la griotte Cámbrica de Los Barrios de Luna y de otras sucesiones comparables. — Trabajos Geol.,2, 45–57; Oviedo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandercammen, A. (1950): Contribution à l’étude des spongiaires hétéractinellides. — Bull. Inst. roy. Sci. natur. Belgique,26, 1–23, Taf. 1–6; Brüssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, Ch. D. (1920): Cambrian geology and paleontology IV. No. 6. Middle cambrian spongiae. — Smithsonian Miscell. Coll.,67 (6), 261–364, Abb. 4–10, Taf. 60–90; Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, R. (1963): Beitrag zur Stratigraphie des Kambriums in Galicien (Nordwest-Spanien). — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,117, 360–371, 1 Karte; Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968): Die Geologie in der nordöstlichen Provinz Lugo (Nordwest-Spanien). — Geotekt. Forsch.,27, 3–70, Abb. 1–8, Taf. 1–4; Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurm, A. (1968): Geological review of the Variscan highlands in Northeastern Bavaria. — Internat. geol. Congr., XXIII, Prague, Guide to Excursion C 34, 7–23; Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamarreño, I. &Julivert, M. (1968): Estratigrafía del Cámbrico del Oriente de Asturias y estudio petrográfico de las facies carbonatadas. — Trabajos Geol.,1, 135–163, Abb. 1–7, Taf. 1–8; Oviedo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žuravleva, I. T. &Korde, K. B. (1955): Nachodka gubkiChancelloria Walcott v otloženijach nižnego kembrija sibiri —Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,104 (3), 474 bis 477, 1 Taf.; Moskau.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit Tafel 14–16 und 9 Text-Abbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sdzuy, K. Unter- und mittelkambrische Porifera (Chancelloriida und Hexactinellida). Paläontol. Z. 43, 115–147 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987647

Navigation