Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals

What are the benefits and limitations?

  • Commentaries
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an ongoing discussion whether in the environmental risk assessment for chemicals the so called ‘deterministic’ approach using point estimates of exposure and effect concentrations is still appropriate. Instead, the more detailed and scientifically sounder probabilistic methods that have been developed over the last years are widely recommended. Here, we present the results of a probabilistic effect assessment for the aquatic environment performed for the pesticide methyl parathion and compare them with the results obtained with the common deterministic approach as described in the EU Technical Guidance Document. Methyl parathion was chosen because a sufficient data set (acute toxicity data for about 70 species) was available. The assumptions underlying the probabilistic effect assessment are discussed in the light of the results obtained for methyl parathion. Two important assumptions made by many studies are: (i) a sufficient number of ecologically relevant toxicity data is available, (ii) the toxicity data follow a certain distribution such as log-normal. Considering the scarcity of data for many industrial chemicals, we conclude that these assumptions would not be fulfilled in many cases if the probabilistic assessment was applied to the majority of industrial chemicals. Therefore, despite the well-known limitations of the deterministic approach, it should not be replaced by probabilistic methods unless the assumptions of these methods are carefully checked in each individual case, which would significantly increase the effort for the assessment procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldenberg T, Slob W (1993): Confidence Limits for Hazardous Concentrations Based on Logistically Distributed NOEC Data. Ecotox Environ Safety25, 4–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Caldwell RS, Chapman PF (1996): A Warning: NOECs are Inappropriate for Regulatory Use. Environ Toxicol Chem15, 77–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Fairbrother A, Brown D (1998): A Critical Evaluation of Safety (Uncertainty) Factors for Ecological Risk Assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem17, 99–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CFR (1995): Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 132: Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System. United States Government Printing Office

  • Duke DL, Taggart M (2000): Uncertainty Factors in Screening Ecological Risk Assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem19, 1668–1680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1998): Chemicals in the European Environment: Low Doses, High Stakes? European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Emans HJB, v. d. Plassche EJ, Canton JH, Okkerman PC, Sparenburg PM (1993): Validation of some Extrapolation Methods Used for Effect Assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem12, 2139–2154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EU (1996): Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances and Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • Forbes TL, Forbes VE (1993): A Critique of the Use of Distribution-Based Extrapolation Models in Ecotoxicology. Functional Ecology7, 249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammers-Wirtz M, Ratte HT (2000): Offspring Fitness in Daphnia: Is the Daphnia Reproduction Test Appropriate for Extrapolating Effects on the Population Level? Environ Toxicol Chem19, 1856–1866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel R (1993): Environmental Health Criteria 145: Methyl parathion. World Health Organization

  • Klepper O, Bakker J, Traast TP, Van de Meent D (1998): Mapping the Potentially Affected Fraction of Species (PAF) as a Basis for Comparison Ecotoxicological Risks between Substances and Regions. J Hazard Mat61, 337–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman SALM (1987): A Safety Factor for LC50 Values Allowing for Differences in Sensitivity among Species. Wat Res21, 269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koller G, Hungerbühler K, Fent K (2000): Data Ranges in Aquatic Toxicity of Chemicals. ESPR — Environ Sci & Pollut Res7, 135–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Länge R, Hutchinson TH, Scholz N, Solbé J (1998): Analysis of the ECETOC Aquatic Toxicity (EAT) Database II: Comparison of Acute to Chronic Ratios for Various Aquatic Organisms and Chemical Substances. Chemosphere36, 115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legierse K C H M (1998): Differences in Sensitivity of Aquatic Organisms to Organophosphorus pesticides, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands Newman MC, Ownby DR, Mézin LCA, Powell DC, Christensen

    Google Scholar 

  • TRL, Lerberg SB, Anderson B-A (2000): Applying Species-Sensitivity Distributions in Ecological Risk Assessment: Assumptions of Distribution Type and Sufficient Numbers of Species. Environ Toxicol Chem19, 508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power M, McCarthy LS (1997): Fallacies in Ecological Risk Assessment Practices. Environ Sci Technol31, 370A-375A

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR et al. (1996): Ecological Risk Assessment of Atrazine in North American Surface Waters. Environ Toxicol Chem15, 31–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR (1996): Overview of Recent Developments in Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment. Risk Anal15, 627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR, Giddings JM, Maund SJ (2001): Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Cotton Pyrethroids: I. Distributional Analysis of Laboratory Aquatic Toxicity Data. Environ Toxicol Chem20, 652–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach D (1999): Diploma thesis. ETH Zürich

  • Suter GW (1993): Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW (1998): Comments on the Interpretation of Distributions in ‘Overview of Recent Developments in Ecological Risk Assessment’. Risk Anal18, 3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoeven N (2001): Estimating the 5-Percentile of the Species Sensitivity Distributions without any Assumptions about the Distribution. Ecotoxicology10, 25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Straalen NM, Denneman CAJ (1989): Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Soil Quality Criteria. Ecotox Environ Safety18, 241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, Løkke H (1991): Estimation of Ecotoxicological Protection Levels from NOEC Toxicity Data. Wat Res25, 1237–1242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Scheringer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheringer, M., Steinbach, D., Escher, B. et al. Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 9, 307–314 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987572

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987572

Keywords

Navigation