Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The spatial scale of organic chemicals in multimedia fate modeling

Recent developments and significance for chemical assessment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last years, the spatial range (SR) or characteristic travel distance (CTD) of organic chemicals has found increasing scientific interest as an indicator of the long-range transport (LRT) potential and, in combination with persistence, as a kind of ‘hazard’ indicator on the exposure level. This development coincides with European debates about more effective and more preventive approaches to the chemicals assessment, and about an international, legally-binding instrument for the phase out of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Persistence and LRT potential are important issues in these debates. Here, the development of the concept of assessing the spatial scale from early ideas in the 1970s and 1980s to recent studies in the field of multimedia fate and transport modeling is summarized. Different approaches to the modeling of environmental transport (advective and dispersive) and different methods for quantifying the SR or CTD are compared. Relationships between SR or CTD and different persistence measures are analyzed. Comparison of these relationships shows that conclusions for chemical assessment should be based on an evaluation of different persistence and spatial scale measures. The use of SR or CTD and persistence as hazard indicators in the chemicals assessment is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett DH, McKone TE, Matthies M, Kastenberg WE (1998): General Formulation of Characteristic Travel Distance for Semi-Volatile Organic Chemicals in a Multi-Media Environment. Environ Sci Technol 32:4023–4030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DH, Scheringer M, McKone TE, Hungerbühler K (2001): Predicting Long-Range Transport: A Systematic Evaluation of two Multimedia Transport Models. Environ Sci Technol 35: 1181–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer A, Mackay D, Matthies M, Wania F, Webster E (2000): Assessing Long-Range Transport Potential of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 24: 699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer A, Matthies M (2001): Long-Range Transport Potential of Semivolatile Organic Chemicals in Coupled Air-Water Systems. ESPR — Environ Sci Poll Res 8, this issue

  • Beyer A, Scheringer M, Schulze C, Matthies M (2001): Comparing Representations of the Environmental Spatial Scale of Organic Chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 922–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman P, Fairbrother A, Brown D (1998): A Critical Evaluation of Safety (Uncertainty) Factors for Ecological Risk Assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 17, 99–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2001): White Paper — Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. COM (2001) 88 final. Brussels

  • Frische R, Esser G, Schönborn W, Klöpffer W (1982): Criteria for Assessing the Environmental Behavior of Chemicals: Selection and Preliminary Quantification. Ecotox Environ Safety 6: 283–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrad SJ (1998): Dioxins, Dibenzofurans and PCBs in Atmospheric Aerosols. In: Harrison RH, van Grieken RE (Eds): Atmospheric Particles. Chichester: Wiley. 233–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Held H (2001): Semianalytical Spatial Ranges and Persistences of Non-Polar Chemicals for Reaction-Diffusion Type Dynamics. In: Integrated Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics (Eds Matthies, Malchow MH, Kriz J), Springer Heidelberg (in press)

  • Hertwich EG, McKone TE (2001): Pollutant-Specific Scale of Multimedia Models and Its Implications for the Potential Dose. Environ Sci Technol 35: 142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling CD, Heimann M (1986): Meridional Eddy Diffusion Model of the Transport of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide 2. Mean Annual Carbon Cycle. J Geophys Res 91 D7: 7782–7796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klecka G, Boethling R, Franklin J, Graham D, Grady L, Howard PH, Kannan K, Larson R, Mackay D, Muir D, van de Meent D (2000): Evaluation of Persistence and Long-Range Transport of Organic Chemicals in the Environment: Guidelines and Criteria for Evaluation and Assessment. Pensacola: SETAC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester CJ, Hites RA (1992): Photodegradation of Polychlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans Adsorbed to Fly Ash. Environ Sci Technol 26: 502–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korte F, Klein W, Drefahl B (1970): Technische Umweltchemikalien, Vorkommen, Abbau und Konsequenzen. Naturw Rdsch 23: 445–457

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristen C (1999): Precautionary Principle Challenges US Policy, Workshop Finds. Environ Sci Technol 33: 304A-305A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies M, Brüggemann R, Trenkle R (1986): Multimedia Modeling Approach for Comparing the Environmental Fate of Chemicals. In: Environmental Modeling for Priority Setting Among Existing Chemicals (Eds GSF-Projektgruppe Umweltgefährdungspotentiale von Chemikalien), ecomed publishers Landsberg, pp 211–252

  • Okubo A (1971): Oceanic Diffusion Diagrams. Deep Sea Res 18: 789–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekar M, Pavlova N, Gusev A, Shatalov V, Vulikh N, Ioannisian D, Dutchak S, Berg T, Hjellbreke AG (1999): Long-Range Transport of Selected Persistent Organic Pollutants. EMEP report 4/99, Moscow: MSC-East

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M, McCarthy LS (1997): Fallacies in Ecological Risk Assessment Practices. Environ Sci Technol 31: 370A-375A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quartier R, Müller-Herold U (2001): On Secondary Spatial Ranges of Transformation Products in the Environment. Ecol Mod 135: 187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan BD, Pennington DW, Eckley N, Boethling RS (1999): Screening for Persistent Organic Pollutants: Techniques to Provide a Scientific Basis for POPs Criteria in International Negotiations. Environ Sci Technol 33: 3482–3488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohleder H, Münzer B, Voigt K (1986): E4CHEM (Exposure and Ecotoxicity Estimation of Environmnetal CHEMicals) — A Computerized Aid for Priority Setting. In: Environmental Modeling for Priority Setting Among Existing Chemicals (Eds GSF-Projektgruppe Umweltgefährdungspotentiale von Chemikalien), ecomed publishers Landsberg, pp 491–524

  • Scheringer M (1996): Persistence and Spatial Ranges as Endpoints of an Exposure-Based Assessment of Organic Chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 30: 1652–1659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheringer M (1997): Characterization of the Environmental Distribution Behavior of Organic Chemicals by Means of Persistence and Spatial Range. Environ Sci Technol 31: 2891–2897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheringer M, Berg M, Müller-Herold U (1994): Jenseits der Schadensfrage: Umweltschutz durch Gefährdungsbegrenzung. In: Berg M et al. (Eds): Was ist ein Schaden? Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine, 115–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheringer M, Wegmann F, Fenner K, Hungerbühler K (2000): Investigation of the Cold Condensation of Persistent Organic Pollutants with a Global Multimedia Fate Model. Environ Sci Technol 34: 1842–1850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheringer M, Bennett DH, McKone TE, Hungerbühler K (2001a): Relationships between Persistence and Spatial Range of Environmental Chemicals. In: Lipnick RL et al. (Eds): Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals II: Assessment and New Chemicals. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheringer M, Held H, Stroebe M (2001b): Chemrange 1.0 - A Multimedia Transport Model for Calculating Persistence and Spatial Range of Organic Chemicals. Zürich, Laboratorium für Technische Chemie,http:// ltcmail.ethz.ch/hungerb/research/product/chemrange.html

  • Snyder EM Snyder SA, Giesy JP, Blonde SA, Hurlburt GK, Summer CL, Mitchell RR, Bush DM (2000): SCRAM: A Scoring and Ranking System for Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Substances for the North American Great Lakes. ESPR — Environ Sci Pollut Res 7: 52–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wania F, Mackay D (1995): A Global Distribution Model for Persistent Organic Chemicals. Sci Total Environ 160/161: 211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wania F, Mackay D, Li YF, Bidleman TF, Strand A (1999): Global Chemical Fate of α-Hexachlorocyclohexane. 1. Modification and Evaluation of a Global Distribution Model. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 1390–1399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Hönggerberg, Safety and Environmental Technology Group, Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland

    Martin Scheringer & Konrad Hungerbühler

  2. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück, D-49069, Osnabrück, Germany

    Michael Matthies

Authors
  1. Martin Scheringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konrad Hungerbühler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Matthies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Scheringer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheringer, M., Hungerbühler, K. & Matthies, M. The spatial scale of organic chemicals in multimedia fate modeling. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 8, 150–155 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987378

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987378

Keywords

Search

Navigation