Abstract
The potential hazard of chemicals on aquatic communities are generally evaluated by standardised single-species bioassays. Safety assessment is based on results gained from organisms adapted to lentic systems and biological interactions in ecosystems are neglected. While lotic communities are often at first in contact with chemicals, it is astonishing that microcosms with lentic communities are mainly used as a bridge between laboratory bioassays and outdoor aquatic systems. Hence, we established five artificial indoor streams to simulate abiotic factors of small rivers. The closed-circuit system was filled with nutrients added to tap water. Washed pebbles were used as sediment. The dynamics of a simple biocoenoses consisting of aufwuchs,Lumbriculus variegatus Asellus aquaticus andGammarus fossarum was investigated. The dynamic of aufwuchs and periphyton was determined as dry weight and chlorophyll-a, respectively and qualitatively by pigment pattern. The abundance of different developmental stages ofL. variegatus was determined at the end of the experiment as well as the population dynamics ofG. fossarum andA. aquaticus. Survival rates of gammarids and juveniles per female were investigated and data were used for modelling the population dynamics. The experiment was carried out to investigate the performance of the established artificial streams and the developed approaches to investigate effects of chemicals on a basic lotic community. The prime reason to establish this approach was to close a gap between complex artificial stream systems and laboratory single species tests to assess the impact of chemicals on the aquatic environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begon, M.;Harper, J.L.;Townsend C. R. (1991): Ökologie: Individuen, Populationen und Lebensgemeinschaften. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel
Belanger, S.E. (1997): Literature review and analyses of biological complexity in model stream ecosystems: Influence of size and experimental design. Ecotoxicol. Environm. Safety 36, 1–16
Biggs, B.J.F. (1988): Artificial substrate exposure times for periphyton biomass estimates in rivers. New Zealand J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 22, 507–515
Brock, T.C.M.;Budde, B.J. (1994): On the choice of structural parameters to indicate responses of freshwater ecosystems to pesticide stress. In:I.R. Hill, F. Heimbach, P. Leeuwangh andP. Matthiesen (Eds) Freshwater field tests for hazard assessment of chemicals. Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Ann Abor, London Tokyo, pp 19
Cairns, J. (1985): Multispecies Toxicity Testing. Pergamon Press
Cattaneo, A.;Kerimian, T.;Roberge, M.;Marty, J. (1997): Periphyton distribution and abundance on substrata of different size along a gradient of stream trophy. Hydrobiol. 354, 101–110
Cuker, B.E. (1983): Grazing and nutrient interactions in controlling the activity and composition of the epilithic algal community in an arctic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr.28 (1) 133–141
Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasserund Schlammuntersuchungen DIN 38405-D11-1: Ortho Phosphat; DIN 3 8405-D114: Gesamt-Phosphat; DIN 38405-D9-2: Nitrat; DIN 38406-E5-1: Ammonium; DIN 38406 -E5-1: gelöste Kieselsäure; EN 26777: Nitrit
Drewes, C.D.;Fourtner, C.R. (1990): Morphallaxis in an aquatic oligochaete,Lumbriculus variegatus: Reorganization of escape reflexes in regenerating body fragments. Developm. Biol.14, 94–103
DeNicola, D.M.;McIntire, C.D. (1990): Effects of substrate relief on the distribution of perihyton in laboratory streams. II. Interactions with irradiances. J. Phycol.26, 634–641
DeNicola, D.M.;McIntire, C.D.;Lamberti, G.A.;Gregory, S.V.;Ashkenas, L.R. (1990): Temporal patterns of grazer-periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. Freshw. Biol.23, 475–489
Gledhill, T.;Sutcliffe, D.W.;Williams; W.D. (1976): A revised key to British freshwater Crustacea: Malacostraca occurring in fresh water. Freshw. Biol. Assoc. 32, pp 72
Gruner, H.E. (1965): Krebstiere oder Crustacea. V. Isopoda. In: F. Dahl (Begr.) and F. Pens, (Eds): Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und angrenzenden Meeresteile nach ihren Merkmalen und nach ihrer Lebensweise. Bd. 51, Fischer, Jena, pp 147
Hill, I.R.; Heimbach, F.; Leeuwangh, P.; Mathiessen, P. (1994): Freshwater Field Test for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. Lewis Publisher
Hill, W.R.;Boston, H.L. (1991): Community development alters photosynthesis-irradiance relations in stream periphyton. Limnol. Oceanogr.36 (7) 1375–1389
Kjeldsen, K. (1996): Regulation of algal biomass in a small lowland stream: field experiments on the role of invertebrate grazing, phosphorus and irradiance. Freshw. Biol. 36, 535–546
Lamberti, G.A.;Ashkenas, L.R.;Gregory, S.V.;Steinman, A.D. (1987): Effects of three herbivores on periphyton communities in laboratory streams. J. North Amer. Benthol. Soc. 6, 92–104
Mählmann, J.; Schmidt, J.; Jungmann, D.; Nagel, R. (1999): Populationsmodelle fürAsellus aquaticus undGammarus fossarum in Fließrinnen im Gewächshaus. In: Oehlmann, J. und B. Markert (Eds): Ökotoxikologie — ökosystemare Ansätze und Methoden. ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft Landsberg, 176–185
Nilson, L.M. (1977): Incubation time, growth and mortality of the amphipodGammarus pulex under laboratory conditions. Oikos29, 93–98
Pöckl, M. (1992): Effects of temperature, age and body size on moulting and growth in the freshwater amphipodsGammarus fossarum and G.roeseli. Freshw. Biol.27, 211–225
Pockl, M. (1995): Laboratory studies on growth, feeding, moulting and mortality in freshwater amphipodsGammarus fossarum. Arch. Hydrobiol.134 (2) 207–222
Pockl, M.;Humpesch, H. (1990): Intraand inter-specific variations in egg survival and brood development time for Australian populations ofGammarus fossarum and G.roeseli (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Freshw. Biol.23, 441–455
Quinn, J.M.;Hickey, C.W.;Linklater, W. (1996): Hydraulic influences on periphyton and macroinvertebrates: simulating the effects of upstream bed roughness. Freshw. Biol.35, 301–309
Sobczak, W.V.;Burton, T.M. (1996): Epilithic bacterial and algal colonization in a stream run, riffle and pool: a test of biomass covariation. Hydrobiol. 332, 159–166
Versteeg, D.J.;Belanger, S.E.;Carr, G.J. (1999): Understanding singlespecies and model ecosystem sensitivity: data-based comparison. Environm. Toxicol. Chem.18 (6) 1329–1346
Vinebrooke, R.D.;Leavitt, P.R. (1999): Phytobenthos and phytoplankton as potential indicators of climate change in mountain lakes and ponds: a HPLC-based pigment approach. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.18(1) 15–33
Wilhelm, C.;Volkmar, P.;Lohmann, C.;Becker, A.;Meyer, M. (1995): The HPLC-aided pigment analysis of phytoplankton as a powerful tool in water quality control. J. Wat. SRT-Aqua.44 (3) 132–141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jungmann, D., Brust, K., Licht, O. et al. Artificial indoor streams as a method to investigate the impact of chemicals on lotic communities. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 8, 49–55 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987294
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987294