Skip to main content
Log in

The genetics of ‘corky’

II. Further studies on its genetic basis in relation to the general problem of interspecific isolating mechanisms

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Further data are presented in support of the writer’s previous finding (Stephens, 1946) that the Corky complementary genes in New World cottons are not located at independent loci. Comparison with analogous, more critically analysed cases suggests that the complementary genes are pseudo-alleles.

  2. 2.

    The Corky complex is located on the same chromosome in theD genom as the Crinkle/Contorta series, and no critical evidence of crossing-over between them has yet been obtained. It is suggested that the Crinkle/Contorta series may also have a pseudo-allelic basis.

  3. 3.

    A re-examination of the complementary Crumpled mechanism in Asiatic cottons (A genom) shows striking genetic and phenotypic similarity to the Corky mechanism, and suggests that the two complexes have a similar pseudo-allelic basis. In spite of their close similarity there is, as yet, no critical evidence that Crumpled and Corky are duplicates.

  4. 4.

    A survey of similar complementary mechanisms inCrepis andTriticum/Aegilops hybrids in comparison with Crumpled and Corky suggests that they all may have a similar basis, and may have played a part in interspecific isolation during one phase of their respective evolutionary histories. Reasons are given for the opinion that complementary isolating mechanisms are more likely to be built up from pseudo-allelic complexes than from independent loci.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beasley, J. O. (1942). Meiotic chromosome behavior in species, species hybrids, haploids and induced polyploids ofGossypium.Genetics,27, 25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhola Nath &Govande, G. K. (1943). On the occurrence of the complementary gene for Crumpled, Cpa, in Rozi cotton.Ind. J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 3, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. (1936). The bar ‘gene’ a duplication.Science,83, 210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1941).Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1932). The genetics of cotton. Part V.J. Genet. 25, 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1933). Some notes on Moco cotton in Brazil.Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 10, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1934). Two cases of linkage in New World cottons.Trop. Agriculture, Trin.,11, 316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1939a).The Genetics of Cotton. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1939b). Genetical studies in the genusGossypium and their relationship to evolutionary and taxonomic problems.Proc. VIIth Int. Genet. Congr. (Edinburgh, 1939), p. 138.

  • Harland, S. C. &Atteck, O. M. (1941). Normal alleles of the crinkled mutant ofGossypium barbadense L. differing in dominance potency.J. Genet. 42, 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, L. (1930). A lethal factor inCrepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid.Genetics,15 114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. B. (1932). The genetics of cotton. Part VII.J. Genet. 25, 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. B. (1938). The distribution ofGossypium and the evolution of the commercial cottons.1st Cotton Conf. Ind. Cent. Cotton Cttee, Bombay.

  • Hutchinson, J. B. (1946). The crinkled dwarf allelomorph series in the New World cottons.J. Genet. 47, 178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. B. (1945). The relation of repeats to position effect inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics,30, 137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. (1944). The relation of homozygous deficiencies to mutations and allelic series in maize.Genetics,29, 478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1942).Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1935). The origination of chromatin deficiencies as minute deletions subject to insertion elsewhere.Genetica,17, 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E. R. (1944). Inviability of intergeneric hybrids involvingTriticum monococcum andT. aegilopoides.Genetics,29, 113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serebrowsky, A. S. (1938). Genes scute and achaete inDrosophila melanogaster and a hypothesis of gene divergency.C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 19, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silow, R. A. (1941). The comparative genetics ofGossypium anomalum and the cultivated Asiatic cottons.J. Genet. 42, 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silow, R. A. (1946). Evidence on chromosome homology and gene homology in the amphidiploid New World cottons.J. Genet. 47, 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. G. (1946). The genetics of ‘Corky’. Part I.J. Genet. 47, 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. G. (1948). A biochemical basis for the pseudo-allelic anthocyanin series inGossypium.Genetics,33, 191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. P. &Chang, T. S. (1948). Further studies on the inheritance of anthocyanin pigmentation in Asiatic cotton.J. Genet. 49, 46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

(With Two Text-figures)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stephens, S.G. The genetics of ‘corky’. Journ. of Genetics 50, 9–20 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986790

Keywords

Navigation