Skip to main content
Log in

The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. V. Factors for body colour

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

VII. Summary

1. The woodlouse,Armadillidium vulgare, is polymorphic for body colours.

2. The rarer types of body colour may be due to either dominant or recessive factors. Some types are sex-limited to females.

3. Populations near Cambridge were scored for different colour types. About 12 per cent of the females were of the rarer types.

4. There was evidence in the case of the dominant factor for red body colour that heterozygotes were more viable than homozygotes.

5. Woodlice are eaten by birds, and this could be a cause maintaining the polymorphic structure of populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Edney, E. B. (1953). The woodlice of Great Britain and Ireland—a concise systematic monograph.Proc. Linn. Soc., Lond.,164, 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (1951 and 1955).Bird Recognition. Vol. II. Birds of Prey and Water-Fowl. Vol. III. Rails, Game-Birds and Larger Perching and Singing Birds. Penguin Books Ltd., Harmondsworth, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1955). On the biochemistry of heterosis, and the stabilization of polymorphism.Proc. Roy. Soc. B.,144, 217–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. W. (1940). The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. I. A general survey of the problems.J. Genet.,40, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. W. (1942). The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. II. Studies on the inheritance of monogeny and amphogeny.J. Genet.,44, 143–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. W. (1953). The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. III. Dominant and recessive genes for red body colour.J. Genet.,51, 259–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. W. (1958). The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. IV. Lines breeding true for amphogeny and thelygeny.J. Genet.,56, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, J. J. (1941). Cas d’intersexualité chez l’Isopode terrestreArmadillidium vulgare (Latreille).C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris,212, 808–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandel, A. (1939). Recherches sur la génétique d’Armadillidium vulgare (Latr.), dans ses rapports avec la monogénie.C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris,208, 1351–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandel, A. (1940). Les mutations chez les Isopodes terrestres.C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris,210, 231–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandel, A. (1945). Recherches sur la génétique et la sexualité des Isopodes terrestres. IX. Recherches de génétique sur quelques Oniscoïdes.Bull. biol.,79, 168–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherby, H. F., Jourdain, F. C. R., Ticehurst, N. F. andTucker, B. W. (1943).The Handbook of British Birds. 5 volumes Witherby, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, H.W. The genetics ofArmadillidium vulgare Latr. V. Factors for body colour. J Genet 58, 29–38 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986116

Keywords

Navigation