Skip to main content
Log in

FDG uptake in colonic villous adenomas

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colonic adenomas constitute 70-80% of all colorectal polyps, and their clinical significance relates primarily to their relationship with colorectal cancer. The malignant potential of the polyps detected by FDG-PET is unknown, as not all the colonic lesions identified by FDG-PET represent colorectal malignancies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of FDG-PET positivity within colonie villous adenomas. A pathology database search was performed to identify all patients diagnosed with colonic villous adenoma between June 1, 1996 and December 1, 2000. Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of colonic villous adenoma and who also had a FDG-PET study up to 1 month before colonoscopy were included in this study. FDG-PET findings were compared with pathological features. Of more than 4,000 patients, six patients were diagnosed with colonic adenoma on subsequent colonoscopy following FDG-PET study. Based on the pathological findings, these 6 patients had a total of 2 villous and 9 tubulovillous adenomas. Five of the 6 patients showed foci of increased FDG uptake in the region of the colon that corresponded to the villous adenoma(s) detected on colonoscopy, which accounted for a true-positive rate of 83.3% (5/6 subjects). Focal lesions in the colon seen on FDG-PET examinations need to be investigated further, even though some of these will prove to be villous adenomas rather than colorectal carcinomas. Future studies in a larger number of patients are needed to evaluate the relationship of histopathological features of colonie polyps and detectability of these lesions by FDG-PET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ackroyd FW, Hedberg SE. Colonic polyps.Annu Rev Med 1985; 36: 619–625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Drenth JP, Nagengast FM, Oyen WJ. Evaluation of (pre-) malignant colonie abnormalities: endoscopie validation of FDG-PET findings:EurJ Nucl Med 2001; 28: 1766–1769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yasuda S, Fuji H, Nakahara T, et al.18F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas.J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 989–992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, Conti PS. Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings.Radiology 2002; 224: 783–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 658–662.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Felig DM, Sedarat A, Agress Jr H, Waintraub SE. Colonic adenomas detected by18F-FDG PET.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002; 56: 734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasuda S, Takahashi W, Takagi S, et al. Factors influencing physiological FDG uptake in the intestine.Tokai J Exp Clin Med 1998; 23: 241–244.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuri Arslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, N., Dehdashti, F. & Siegel, B.A. FDG uptake in colonic villous adenomas. Ann Nucl Med 19, 331–334 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984628

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984628

Key words

Navigation