Abstract
This paper presents a consequence of the systematic approach to identify the aerodynamic parameters of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with the automatic flight control system. A 3-2-1-1 excitation is applied for the longitudinal mode while a multi-step input is applied for lateral/directional excitation. Optimal time step for excitation is sought to provide the broad input bandwidth. A fully automated programmed flight test method provides highquality flight data for system identification using the flight control computer with longitudinal and lateral/directional autopilots, which enable the separation of each motion during the flight test. The accuracy of the longitudinal system identification is improved by an additional use of the closed-loop flight test data. A constrained optimization scheme is applied to estimate the aerodynamic coefficients that best describe the time response of the vehicle. An appropriate weighting function is introduced to balance the flight modes. As a result, concurrent system models are obtained for a wide envelope of both longitudinal and lateral/directional flight maneuvers while maintaining the physical meanings of each parameter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gelb, A., 1974,Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Harael, P. and Jategaonkar, R., 1996, “Evolution of Flight Vehicle System Identification,”Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 33. No. 1, pp. 9–28.
Hoak, D., 1972USAF Stability and Control DATCOM, Flight Control Division, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Peterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
Iliff, K. and Maine, R., 1984,More Than You May Want To Know About Maximum Likelihood Estimation, NASA-TM-85905.
Iliff, K., 1989, “Parameter Estimation for Flight Vehicles,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12. No. 5, pp. 609–622.
Jategaonkar, R. and Plaetschke, E., 1989, “Algorithms for Aircraft Parameter Estimation Accounting for Process and Measurement Noise,”Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 360–372.
Kim, H., Kim, Y. and Lee. S., 1997, “Identification Technique of Linear System Using Time Responses and Eigen Information,”Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Forum, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, April.
Kim, I., Lee, Y. and Suk, J., 2001, “Development of ADAS and Its Verification through Flight Tests,”Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 123–128.
Klein. V., 1989, “Estimation of Aircraft Aerodynamic Parameters From Flight Data,”Progress in Aerospace Science, Vol. 26, pp. 1–77.
Kuo, C., Schoen, M., Chinvorat, S. and Huang, J., 2000, “Closed-Loop System Identification by Residual Whitening,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 406–411.
Lee, H. and Lee, S., 1998, “Parameter Estimation of a Single Turbo-Prop Aircraft Dynamic Model.”Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 38–44.
Lee. Y., Suk, J. and Kim, T., 2001, “Stability Flight Test Methods for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,”Proceedings of 2001 Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences Annual Conference, Kyongsang National University, Chinju, Korea. Apr. pp. 371–376.
Maine, R. and Murray, J., 1988, “Application of Parameter Estimation to Highly Unstable Aircraft, ”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 213–219.
Morelli, E. and Klein, V., 1990, “Optimal Input Design for Aircraft Parameter Estimation Using Dynamic Programming Principles”. AIAA 90-2801 CP.
Morelli. E., 1996, “Parameter Identification Flight Test Maneuvers for Closed Loop Modeling of the F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV).” NASA-CR-198269.
Morelli, E., 1997, “Flight Test Validation of Optimal Input Design and Comparison to Conventional Inputs,”Proceedings of AIAA Flight Mechanics Conference, New Orleans, Liouisiana, Aug. 11–13.
Morelli, E., 2000, “Real-Time Parameter Estimation in the Frequency Domain,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 812 - 818.
Shafer, M., 1984,Flight Investigation of Various Control Inputs Intended for Parameter Estimation, NASA-TM-85901.
Song, C., Jeon, I., Lee, S. and Kwon, S., 1995, “Estimation of the Aerodynamic Parameters for a Flight Vehicle From Flight Test,”AIAA-95-3497-CP.
Song, Y. and Hwang, M., 1998, “A Study on the Aircraft Parameter Estimation from Flight Test Data,”Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 1–12.
Song, Y., Song, B., Seanor, B. and Napolitano, M., 2002, “On-Line Aircraft Parameter Identification Using Fourier Transform Regression With an Application to NASA F/A-18-HARV Flight Data,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 327–337.
Speyer, J. and Crues, E., 1987, “On-Line Aircraft State and Stability Derivative Estimation Using the Modified-Gain Extended Kaiman Filter,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 262–268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suk, J., Lee, Y., Kim, S. et al. System identification and stability evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle from automated flight tests. KSME International Journal 17, 654–667 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983861
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983861