Skip to main content
Log in

The genetic analysis of familial traits

II. Double gene substitutions, with special reference to hereditary dwarfism

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The limits between which the expected ratios of affected offspring of parents of all possible phenotypes will lie, when a trait is determined by two complementary dominant genes on different chromosomes, or two independent recessive genes, have been investigated in this communication. The proportions expected vary with the incidence of the trait in the population. In the case of a trait determined by two independent complementary dominant genes the limiting value for matings of two normal parents is the same as that for a single recessive trait. When the two gene frequencies are of the same order this limit is reached rapidly.

  2. 2.

    Recorded data of various pathological conditions have been examined from this standpoint, and it has been shown that the extant observations on ateleiosis, and the Japanese cases of hereditary optic atrophy are interpretable on the assumption that this condition is significantly determined by two dominant genes. It is unlikely that this explanation will be found to apply to achondroplasia. It is possible that it applies to cleft palate, harelip and glioma retinae.

  3. 3.

    The foregoing analysis emphasises four prerequisites for the application of factorial analysis to clinical data. These are: first, exact information concerning the frequency of familial traits in the general population; second, the elimination of any bias due to neglect of families with a low familial incidence; third, the collection of random samples of matings involving one affected parent unbiassed by the possibility that such matings may or may not yield affected offspring; and finally, searching enquiry into the tendency to assortative mating.

  4. 4.

    One significant outcome of the present enquiry is the fact that the expected proportions of affected individuals calculated in such a way as to make allowance for the small size of the human family diverge at the lower limit much less rapidly than is at all obvious at first sight, as the number of genes determining a given trait increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bele, Julia (1922).“Retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases.”Treasury of Human Inheritance, II, part 1.

  • - (1931).“Hereditary optic atrophy.”Ibid, II, part 4.

  • Crew (1924).“An achondroplasia-like condition in cattle.”Proc. Roy. Soc. B, XCVII.

  • Dahlberg (1930). “Eine neue Methode zur familienstatistischen Analyse usw. Inzucht bei Polyhybridität beim Menschen,”Hereditas, XIV.

  • Hogben (1931). “The genetic analysis of familial traits. I.”Journ. Gen. XXV.

  • Jacob (1911). “Inbreeding in a stable simple Mendelian population.”Proc. Roy. Soc. B, LXXXIV.

  • Lenz (1919). “Die Bedeutung der statistisch-ermittelten Belastung mit Blutverwandtschaft, usw.”Münchener Med. Wochenschr. LXVI.

  • Rischbieth andBarrington (1912).“Dwarfism.”Treasury of Human Inheritance, parts 7 and 8.

  • Rischbieth (1910). “Harelip and cleft palate.”Ibid. part 4.

  • Stocks (1925).“Hereditary disorders of bone development.”Ibid. III.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogben, L. The genetic analysis of familial traits. Journ. of Genetics 25, 211–240 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983255

Keywords

Navigation