Specific differences inPetunia

Bateman, A. J. (1943). Specific differences inPetunia. II. Pollen growth.J. Genet.45, 236–42.
Article Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. C. &Ottley, A. M. (1932). Studies inPetunia. III.Amer. J. Bot.19, 385–405.
Article Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1927). On some objections to mimicry theory: statistical and genetic.Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond.75, 269–78.
Google Scholar
Harland, S. C. (1943). Breeding of a cotton immune to natural crossing.Nature, Lond.,151, 307.
Article Google Scholar
Haskell, G. M. L. (1943). The polygenes affecting the manifestation of scute inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. (in the Press).
Mather, K. (1943a). Polygenic inheritance and natural selection.Biol. Rev.18, 32–64.
Article Google Scholar
Mather, K. (1943b). Specific differences inPetunia. I. Incompatibility.J. Genet.45, 215–35.
Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature.Biol. Symposia,6, 71–125.
Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, G. (1943). Hybrid sterility in artificially produced recombinants betweenDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. B,61, 385–97.
Google Scholar
Wigan, L. G. (1943). Balance and potence in natural populations.J. Genet. (in the Press).

Author information

John Innes Horticultural Institution, Merton, London
K. Mather & P. M. J. Edwardes

Authors

K. Mather
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
P. M. J. Edwardes
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Mather, K., Edwardes, P.M.J. Specific differences inPetunia . Journ. of Genetics 45, 243–260 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982967

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.