Summary
1. The somatic chromosome complements of forms ofPaeonia show that there are variations in the morphology of the complements and that polyploidy occurs.
2. The average chiasma frequency at metaphase is low (1·3 per bivalent) and very little terminalisation occurs.
3. All but three of the possible types of multivalent association in a tetraploid were found and the reasons for these absences are discussed.
4. The significance of bivalent interlocking and its relation to bivalent orientation on the spindle is discussed.
5. Evidence of structural hybridity in the paeony chromosome complements is provided by the occurrence of configurations showing deficiencies, translocations, reduplications and inverted segments.
6. Certain critical configurations are described which cannot be adequately explained by the classical hypothesis of chiasma formation or its modifications, but are explicable by the neo-chiasmatype hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belling, J. (1927). “The attachments of chromosomes at the reduction division in the flowering plants.”J. Genet.18, 177–205.
Dark, S. O. S. (1934). “Chromosome studies in Scilleae. II.” Ibid.29, 85–98.
Darlington, C. D. (1931). “The analysis of chromosome pairing inTriticum hybrids.”Cytologia,3, 21–5.
—— (1932).Recent Advances in Cytology. London: Churchill.
—— (1933). “The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. IX. Diploid and tetraploidAvena.”Cytologia,5, 128–34.
—— (1935). “Time, place and action of crossing-over.”J. Genet. 31, 185–212.
Darlington, C. D. andDark, S. O. S. (1932). “The origin and behaviour of Chiasmata. II.Stenobothrus parallelus.”Cytologia,3, 169–85.
Gairdner, A. E. andDarlington, C. D. (1931). “Ring-formation in diploid and polyploidCampanula persicifolia.”Genetica,13, 113–50.
Gaiser, L. O. (1930). “A list of chromosome numbers in Angiosperms. II.”Bibliogr. genet.6, 171–466.
Hicks, G. C. andStebbins, G. L., Jr. (1934). “Meiosis in some species and a hybrid ofPaeonia.”Amer. J. Bot.21, 228–41.
La Cour, L. (1931). “Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology.”J. R. micr. Soc.51, 119–26.
Langlet, O. F. I. (1927). “Beiträge zur zytologie der Ranunculazeen.”Svensk bot. Tidskr.21, 1–17.
McClintock, B. (1931). “Cytological observations of deficiencies involving known genes, translocations and an inversion inZea Mays.”Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta.163.
Moffett, A. A. (1932). “Studies on the formation of multi-nuclear giant pollen grains inKniphofia.”J. Genet.25, 315–37.
Müntzing, A. (1934). “Chromosome fragmentation in aCrepis hybrid.”Hereditas,19, 284–302.
Pellew, C. andSansome, E. R. (1931). “Genetical and cytological studies on the relations between European and Asiatic varieties ofPisum sativum.”J. Genet.25, 25–54.
Sax, K. (1930). “Chromosome structure and the mechanism of crossing-over.”J. Arnold Arbor.11, 193–220.
—— (1932). “Meiosis and chiasma formation inPaeonia suffruticosa.” Ibid.13, 375–84.
—— (1934). “Interlocking as a ‘demonstration’ of the occurrence of crossing-over.”Amer. Nat. 68, 95–6.
Smith, S. G. (1935). “Chromosome fragmentation produced by crossing-over inTrillium erectum L.”J. Genet.30, 227–32.
Stern, F. C. (1931). “Paeony species.”J. R. hort. Soc.61, 71–7.
Tischler, G. (1931). “Pflanzliche Chromosomenzahlen.”Tabul. biol., Berl.,7, 109–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dark, S.O.S. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPaeonia species. Journ. of Genetics 32, 353–372 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982520
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982520