Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the variation ofBombus lapidarius L. and its cuckoo,Psithyrus rupestris Fabr., with notes on mimetic similarity

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfken, J. D. (1913). “Die Bienenfauna von Bremen.”Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen,22, 1–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P. J. (1914). “Les bourdons de la Belgique.”Ann. Soc. ent. Belg.58, 77–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bequaert, J. andPlath, O. E. (1925). “Description of a newPsithyrus, with an account ofPsithyrus laboriosus, and notes on humble-bees.”Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv.67, 265–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, H. (1927). “Biologie der Hymenopteren. Eine Naturgeschichte der Hautflügler.”Biol. Studienb., Berlin,5, 1–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1930). “Zur Kenntnis der GattungPseudovespa.”S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berl. pp. 329–46.

  • —— (1935). “GenusBombus.”Wiss. Ergebn. niederl. Exp. Karakorum,1, 255–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Torre, C. G. von (1896).Catalogus Hymenopterorum,10. Apidae. Lipsiae.

  • Franklin, H. J. (1913). “The Bombidae of the New World. I.”Trans. Amer. ent. Soc.38, 177–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, H. (1904). “Neue oder wenig bekannte Hummeln des Russischen Reiches.”Annu. Mus. zool. Acad. St Pétersb.9, 507–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1913). “Über einige neue Apiden.”Arch. Naturg. 78 nr. 12, 85–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1923).Die europaischen Bienen. Berlin and Leipzig.

  • —— (1931). “ÜberBombus undPsithyrus.”Konowia,10, 300–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, H. andWagner, F. v. (1910). “Zoologische Studien an Hummeln. I. Die Hummeln der dentschen Fauna.”Zool. Jb. Syst.29, 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— —— (1912). “Zoologische Studien an Hummeln. II. Die Hummeln der Arktis, des Hochgebirges und der Steppe.”Ibid. Suppl.1, 155–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frionnet, C. (1902). “Bombus etPsithyrus de France et de Belguique.”Feuille jeunes Natural.32, 165–9, 177–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison, Th. H. (1916). “Note on the habits ofPsithyrus variabilis Cresson.”Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc.11, 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1926). “Contribution to the knowledge of interrelations of the bumble-bees of Illinois with their animate environment.”Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 19, 203–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1927). “A contribution to our knowledge of the relationship of the Bremidae of America north of Mexico.”Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 53, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1928). “A contribution to the knowledge of the life-history ofBremus bimaculatus (Cresson).”Ent. Amer. 8, 159–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1930). “A contribution to our knowledge of the bionomics ofBremus americanorum (Fabr.).”Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 23, 644–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1930a). “A contribution to the knowledge of the bionomics ofBremus vagans (F. Sm.).”Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 25, 109–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaschott, O. (1922). “Zur Phylogenie vonPsithyrus.”Zool. Anz.54, 215–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1928). “Zur Phylogenie vonPsithyrus.” Ibid.78, 224–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlirsch, A. (1888). “Die Hummelsammlung des k. k. naturhistorischen Hofmuseums.”Ann. naturh. (Mus.) Hofmus., Wien,3, 209–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedicke, H. (1930). “Hautflügler, Hymenoptera.”Tierwelt Mitteleur.5, 1–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, E. (1889). “Die Schmarotzerhummeln Steiermarks. Lebensgeschichte und Beschreibung derselben.”Mit. naturw. Ver. Steierm.25, 82–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höppner, H. (1897). “Über zwei unbekannte oder wenig bekannte Hummelnester.”Ent. Nachr.23, 312–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höppner, H. (1901). “Bienenfauna der Dünen und Weserabhänge zwischen Nesen und Baden.”Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen,15, 231–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. O. (1920). “Bumble-bees of district of Columbia and vicinity.”Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.22, 162–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, E. (1920). “Beiträge zur Systematik und Morphologie der mitteleuropäischen Hummeln.”Zool. Jb. Syst.42, 289–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepeletier, A. (1836–46).Histoire naturelle des Insects. Hyménoptères. Paris.

  • Lutz, F. E. andCockerell, T. D. A. (1920). “Notes on the distribution and bibliography of the North American bees of the family Apidae, Meliponidae, Bombidae, Euglossidae, and Anthophoridae.”Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist.42, 491–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawitz, F. (1886). “Insecta in itinere Cl. N. Prezewalskii in Asia centrali novissime lecta.”Horae Soc. ent. Ross.20, 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1894). “Supplement zur Bienenfauna Turkestans.” Ibid.28, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, A. S., jr., (1864). “The humble-bees of New England and their parasites; with notices of a new species ofAnthophorabia, and a new genus of Proctotrupidae.”Proc. Essex Inst.4, 107–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, J. (1883–4). “Contribution à la faune des Apiaires de France.”Actes Soc. Linn. Bordeaux,37, 205–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R. C. L. (1921). “Variation in BritishPsithyrus and remarks onBombus pomorum.”Ent. mon. Mag.57, 82–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plath, O. E. (1922). “Notes onPsithyrus, with records of two new American hosts.”Biol. Bull.43, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1923). “Breeding experiments with confinedBremus (Bombus) queens.” Ibid.45, 325–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V. B. (1931). “Zur Kenntnis der paläarktischen Schmarotzerhummeln (Psithyrus Lap.).”Eos, Madr.7, 131–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilis Pérez, M. (1932). “LosPsithyrus españoles.”Ibid.8, 185–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinig, W. F. (1930). “Untersuchungen zur Kenntnis der Hummelfauna des Pamir-Hochlandes.”Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere,17, 68–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1930a). “Phaenoanalytische Studien über Rassenbildung. I.Psithyrus rupestris Fabr.”Zool. Jb. Syst.60, 257–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1932). “Beiträge zur Faunistik des Pamir-Gebietes.”Wiss. Erg. Alai-Pamir-Exp. Teil iii,1, 1–192;2, 197–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1934). “Hymenoptera VIII. (GenusBombus Fabr.) Nachtrag.”Dtsch. Ent. Z. 1933, 163–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, O. W. (1927). “The specific characters of the British humble-bees.”Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.75, 233–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1928). “On a collection of humble-bees made in Ladakh by Col. R. Meinertzhagen.”Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. ser. 10,2, 333–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1928a). “A revision of the European bees allied toPsithyrus quadricolor Lep.”Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 76, 345–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1929). “On two new species of humble-bees in the collection of the British Museum, constituting a new group of the genusPsithyrus.”Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. ser. 10,3, 139–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1930). “The humble-bees captured on the expedition to Mount Everest.” Ibid. ser. 10,5, 633–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck, A. (1859). “Die nassauischen Bienen (Revision und Ergauzung fruherer Bearbeitungen).”Jb. Ver. Naturk. Nassau,14, 1–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedeknecht, O. (1878). “Monographie der in Thuringen vorkommenden Arten der Hymenopteren-GattungBombus.”Jena. Z. Naturwiss.12, 303–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1882).Apidae Europaeae. I. Gumperdae et Berolini.

  • -- (1930).Die Hymenopteren Nord- und Mitteleuropas. Jena.

  • Skorikov, A. S. (1912). “Neue Hummelformen (Hymenoptera, Bombidae).”Rev. Russe d’Ent.12, 606–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1922). “Les bourdons de la faune paléarctique. I.”Bull. Stat. Protect. Plantes Petrogr. 4, 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1922a). “Faunae Petropolitanae Catalogus.”Petrogr. Agron. Inst. Ent. Stat. 11, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1931). “Die Hummelfauna Turkestans und ihre Beziehungen zur zentralasiatischen Fauna.”Abh. Pamir-Exp. 8, 175–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladen, F. W. L. (1899). “Bombi in captivity, and habits ofPsithyrus.”Ent. mon. Mag.35, 230–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1912).The Humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it. With a description of all the British species of Bombusand Psithyrus. Pp. 1–298. London.

  • —— (1915). “Inquiline bumble-bees in British Columbia.”Canad. Ent. 47, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1919). “Notes on the Canadian representatives of British species of bees.” Ibid.51, 124–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. (1876).Catalogue of British Hymenoptera in the Collection of the British Museum. I. London.

  • Sparre-Schneider, J. (1909). “Hymenoptera aculeata im arktischen Norwegen.”Tromsø Mus. Aarsh.29, 81–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1918). “Die Hummeln der Kristiania-Gegend.” Ibid.40, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelfox, A. W. (1924). “Notes on Irish Aculeates with special reference to the Dublin district.”Irish Nat.33, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckhert, F. K. (1933). “Die Bienen Frankens. Eine ökologisch-tiergeographische Untersuchung.”Beiheft Dtsch. Ent. Z.1932, 1–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, O. (1909, 1911). “Studien über das Variieren der Hummeln.”S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr. Berl. 1909, pp. 28–84; 1911, pp. 31–74.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin

    W. F. Reinig

Authors
  1. W. F. Reinig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinig, W.F. On the variation ofBombus lapidarius L. and its cuckoo,Psithyrus rupestris Fabr., with notes on mimetic similarity. Journ. of Genetics 30, 321–356 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982243

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982243

Keywords

Search

Navigation