Skip to main content
Log in

The anatomy and development of the fidget mouse

With plates 2–4 and nine text-figure

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The fidget gene causes abnormalities in the gross structure of the vestibular part of the membranous labyrinth. The horizontal semicircular canal and its crista ampullaris are both missing. The superior and posterior canals remain rudimentary in form, but the sense organs associated with them are normal.

  2. 2.

    The abnormalities of the membranous labyrinth lead to anomalies in the form of the osseous labyrinth and there is no subarcuate fossa.

  3. 3.

    The parafloccular lobes of the cerebellum are displaced into an abnormal position under the other lateral lobes.

  4. 4.

    The eyes and lens are reduced in size in fidgets, and the latter may remain in contact with the overlying ectoderm, which is probably a contributory cause of corneal ulcers.

  5. 5.

    The lachrymal glands are missing and there are marked corneal ulcers in adult mice.

  6. 6.

    In some fidget animals there is no mandibular canal.

  7. 7.

    The fidget gene increases the number of fusions between certain bones of the skull and in the tarsals.

  8. 8.

    In some fidgets there is a dislocation of the hip and in most fidgets the acetabulum is shallower than normal.

  9. 9.

    The fidget gene increases the incidence of polydactylism.

  10. 10.

    It is believed that the abnormalities of the membranous labyrinth are responsible for those of the osseous labyrinth and. still more indirectly, for the displacement of the paraflocculus. Similarly, the reduction of the lens is probably responsible for the reduction of the size of the eyes as a whole; and it is believed that the absence of the lachrymal glands (and with it the development of the corneal ulcers) is somehow connected with the rest of the eye anomalies. It is supposed that ear and eye anomalies may have a common cause the nature of which is, however, completely obscure. The physiological links of the statistical effects of the fidget gene with the more constant features of the syndrome remain to be discovered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean, A. M. (1929). A morphological analysis of the foot abnormalities occurring in the descendants of X-rayed mice.Amer. J. Anal. 43, 221–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnevie, K. (1936). Abortive differentiation of the ear vesicles following a hereditary bram-anomaiy in the ‘short-tailed waltzing mice’.Genetica,18, 105–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. C. (1951). The position of fidget in linkage group V of the house mouse.J. Genet. 50, 264–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. C. (1951). The genetics of luxate mice. I. Morphological abnormalities of heterozygotes and homozygotes.J. Genet. 50, 277–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. C. &Grüneberg, H. (1950). Linkage between fidget and agouti in the house mouse.Heredity,4, 373–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, H. B. (1945). Studies on an anophthalmia strain of mice. V. Associated cranial nerves and brain centres.J. Comp. Neurol. 83, 121–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, H. B. (1951). Inheritance of Polydactyly in the mouse.Genetics,36, 697–710.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deol, M. S. (1954). The anomalies of the labyrinth of the mutants Varitint-waddler, shaker-2 and jerker in the mouse.J. Genet. 52, 562–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deol, M, S. (1955a). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XIV. Minor variations of the skull.J. Genet. 53, 498–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deol, M. S. (19556). The anatomy and development of three mutants affecting the labyrinth in the mouse. (In preparation.)

  • Dunn, L. C. &Charles, D. R. (1937). Studies on spotting patterns. I. Analysis of quantitative variations in the pied spotting of the house mouse.Genetics,22, 14–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1953). The linkage of Polydactyly with leaden in the house mouse.Heredity,7, 91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasstone, S. (1938). A comparative study of the developmentin vivo andin vitro of rat and rabbit molars.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,126, 315–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. A. (1902). On a method of preparing the membranous labyrinth.J. Anal., Lond.,37, 379–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. C. (1953). A new inherited leg and foot abnormality, luxoid, in the house mouse.Genetics,38, 666 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüneberg, H. (1943). Two new mutant genes in the house mouse.J. Genet. 45, 22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüneberg, H. (1948). Some observations on the microphthalmia gene in the mouse.J. Genet. 49, 1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüneberg, H. (1955). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XV. Relations between major and minor variants.J. Genet. 53, 515–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüneberg, H., Hallpike, C. S. &,Ledoux, A. (1940). Observations on the structure, development and electrical reactions of the internal ear of the shaker-1 mouse (Mus musculus).Proc. Roy. Soc. B,12, 154–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, P. (1944). Die Genese der Him- und Gehörorganmissbildungen bei röntgenmutierten Kreisler-Mäusen.Z. ges. Anat. 2.Z. KonstLehre,28, 327–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, P. (1951). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über Bewegungsstömngen bei Mänsen.Verh. anal. Ges. Jena,49, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, S. B. (1945). A polydactyl gene in mice capable of nearly regular manifestation.Ann. Eugen., Lond.,12, 220–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennep, E. C. C. (1910). Het verloop der afwijkingen in bet gehoororgaan van de Japansche dansmuis, p. 82. Med. Dissertation, Utrecht.

  • Miller, G. (1950). Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung über das erbliche Kolobom mit Mikrophthalmus bei der Hausmaus.Z. mikr. anat. Forsch. 56, 520–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. (1951-2). Die embryonaie Entwieklung ernes sich rezessiv vererbenden Merkmals (Kolobom bei der Hausmaus).Wiss. Z. Martin-Lidher-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg,1, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, A. G. (1954). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XI. The influence of diet on variation within pure lines.J. Genet. 52, 413–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, H. (1938).Embryanic development and induction. Pp. xii + 401. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truslove, G. M. (1952). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. V. ‘Interfrontal’ and ‘parted fronfcals’.J. Genet. 51, 115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. E. (1950). Locus of the gene ‘fidget’ in the house mouse.Nature., Land.,166, 407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Truslove, G.M. The anatomy and development of the fidget mouse. J Genet 54, 64–86 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981704

Keywords

Navigation