Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors inDrosophila melanogaster iv. The cell stage during spermatogenesis and the induction of intra and inter-genic mutations by 2:4:6-tri(ethyleneimino)-1: 3:5-triazine

With seven text-figures

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The mutagenic response of the various stages of spermatogenesis to the action of 2:4:6-tri(ethyleneimino)-l:3:5-triazine has been investigated by the brood technique. The treated male was mated to a succession of virgin females at set intervals, and the mutation rate was scored separately in each brood. The mutation rate/brood relationship for the same genetic property varied in the different experiments. It was found to depend on the structure of the testis at the time of treatment and the gross morphological changes induced in it by the mutagen. Another controlling factor is the way the male germ line is fractionated among the broods, which varies with the rate of germ-cell differentiation and the brood interval. To reduce variability between experiments a standard technique was adopted. The treated males were of the same strain, age and size, were reared under the same culture conditions and their progeny was fractionated at fixed intervals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, C. (1950). Differences between effects of chemical and physical mutagens.Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli (Suppl.),22, 1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, C. (1952). Mutation tests onDrosophila melanogaster with aqueous solutions of formaldehyde.Amer. Nat.86, 330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, C. (1954). Sensitivity of theDrosophila testis to the mutagenic action of X-rays.Z. indukt. Abstamm. u. VererbLehre,86, 113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belgovsky, M. L. (1938). Influence of inert regions of chromosomes on the frequency of occurrence and type of changes in the adjacent active sections.Izv. Akad. Nauk. U.S.S.R., Ser. Biol.,1, 1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgovsky, M. L. (1939). Dependence of the frequency of minute chromosome rearrangements inDrosophila melanogaster upon X-ray dosage.Izv. Alcad. Nauk. U.S.S.R., Ser. Biol.,2, 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, M. J. amp;Fahmy, O. G. (1953). Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors inDrosophila melanogaster. I. l:2,3:4-diepoxybutane.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,140, 556.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. (1936). The Bar ‘gene’ a duplication.Science,83, 210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K. W. (1950). Normal spermatogenesis inDrosophila. Chapter inThe Biology of Drosophila. New York: Shon Willey and Sons. Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. amp;Fano, U. (1941). Mechanism of the origin of the X-ray inducedNotch deficiencies inDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,27, 24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. amp;Hoover, M. E. (1936). Three related X-chromosome deficiencies inDrosophila.J. Hered.26, 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. amp;Hoover, M. E. (1939).Hairy-wing-a duplication inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics,24, 271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, O. G. amp;Bird, M. J. (1953). Chromosome breaks among recessive lethals induced by chemical mutagens inDrosophila melanogaster.Heredity,6, 149, Suppl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, M. J. amp;Fahmy, O. G. (1952). Chemical mutagenesis inDrosophila and its cytogenetic analysisB.E.C.C..Ann. Rep.13, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, O. G. amp;Fahmy, M. J. (1954). Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors inDrosophila melanogaster. II. The mechanism of induction of dominant lethals by 2:4:6-tri(ethyleneimino)-l:3:5-triazine.J. Genet.52, 603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, O. G. amp;Fahmy, M. J. (1955). Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors inDrosophila melanogaster. III. Chromosome structural changes induced by 2:4:6. tri(ethyleneimino)-l:3:5-triazine.J. Genet.53, 181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. (1938).Physiological Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. amp;Lea, D. E. (1947). A mathematical theory of chromosome rearrangements.J. Genet.48, 1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. E. amp;Catcheside, D. G. (1945). Recessive lethals, dominant lethals, and chromosome aberrations inDrosophila.J. Genet.47, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüning, K. G. (1952a). X-ray induced chromosome breaks inDrosophila melanogaster.Hereditas, Lund,38, 321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüning, K. G. (1952b). Studies on the origin of apparent gene mutations inDrosophila melanogaster.Acta Zool.33, 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. (1938). The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behaviour of ring-shaped chromosomes.Genetics,23, 315.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. (1944a). The relation of homozygous deficiencies to mutations and allelic series in maize.Genetics,29, 478.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. (1944b). Maize genetics.Yearb. Garneg. Instn.43, 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H., Bridges, C. B. amp;Sohultz, J. (1937). The gene. Ann. Rep. Dep. Genet.,Yearb. Garneg. Instn,36, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1935a). A viable two gene deficiency.J. Hered.26, 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1935b). The origination of chromatin deficiencies as minute deletions subject to insertion elsewhere.Genetica,17, 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1941). Resume and perspectives of the symposium on genes and chromosomes.Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.9, 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. amp;Mackenzie, K. (1939). Discriminatory effect of ultra-violet rays on mutation inDrosophila.Nature, Lond.,143, 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., Prokofyeva, A. A. amp;Raffel, D. (1935). Minute intergenic rearrangement as a cause of apparent ‘gene mutation’.Nature, Lond.,135, 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serebrovsky, A. S. (1929). A general scheme for the origin of mutations.Amer. Nat.63, 374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slizynska, H. amp;Slinzyski, B. M. (1947). Genetical and cytological studies of lethals induced by chemical treatment inDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. B,62, 234.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, M. (1950). Ergänzende Befunde zur Mutagenen Wirkung der Urethane (Carbaminsaureester) beiDrosophila.Z. indukt. Abstamm. u. VererbLehre,93, 341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fahmy, O.G., Fahmy, M.J. Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors inDrosophila melanogaster iv. The cell stage during spermatogenesis and the induction of intra and inter-genic mutations by 2:4:6-tri(ethyleneimino)-1: 3:5-triazine. J Genet 53, 563–584 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981675

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981675

Keywords

Navigation