Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory I. Short-term responses to selection

With eight text-figures

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The paper describes the response, in the early generations, of a large random-breeding population ofDrosophila melanogaster to selection for abdominal bristle score. The main purpose of the work was an examination of the adequacy of existing theory in describing these phenomena.

  2. 2.

    Estimates of the heritability of the character by parent-offspring, full-sib and half-sib and half-sibs correlations were in. good agreement, the mean value being 0.52.

  3. 3.

    As a further 35 % of the variance in total score could be ascribed to causes affecting sternites separately, it seems very probable that the genes affecting this character act additively or nearly so. This is in agreement with the results from crosses between lines.

  4. 4.

    The responses to selection over seven generations, based either on individual or family score, were in fair agreement with predictions from these estimates with three reservations: (a) There was considerable divergence between replicate lines selected upwards, even when the degree of inbreeding was low. This may be peculiar toDrosophila, which should therefore be used with care in experiments intended for extrapolation to other species. (b) The responses to downward selection were less than expected, as a consequence of a decline in genetic variation within two or three generations. (c) The agreement with prediction was best at high intensities of selection, the response at lower intensities being below expectation.

  5. 5.

    Various of these observations are relevant to the problem of the maintenance of such variation in a population. It seems probable that the forces controlling any genetic equilibrium cannot be strong and that in this character mutation may play an important role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, V. L. &Kempthorne, D. (1954). A model for the study of quantitative inheritance.Genetics,39, 883–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, G. A. &Robertson, A. (1955). Mutation and quantitative variation.Amer. Nat.89, 150–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham, C. C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present.Genetics,39, 859–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J. F. (1954). Breeding structure of populations, II. Effective population number.Statistics in Mathematics and Biology. Ames, U.S.A..: Iowa State Coll. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, A. &Mather, K. (1954). Heritable variation in along inbred line ofDrosophila.Genetica,27, 97–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1953). Asymmetrical response in selection experiments.I.U.B.S. Symposium on Genetics of Population Structure.

  • Mather, K. &Harrison, B. J. (1949). The manifold effect of selection.Heredity,3, 1–52 and 131-62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1950). The internal anatomy and histology of the imago ofDrosophila melanogaster.Biology of Drosophila, ed. M. Demerec. New York; John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmuson, M. (1955). Selection for bristle number in some unrelated strains ofDrosophila melanogaster.Acta Zool. Stockh.,36, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, E. C. R. &Robertson, F. W. (1954). Studies in quantitative inheritance. VI. Stemite chaeta number inDrosophila: a metameric quantitative character.Z. Vererbungslehre, 86, 269–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (1955). Selection in animals, synthesis;Symposia on Quantitative Biology, XX. Cold Spring Harbor.

  • Robertson, A. (1956). The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis.Genetics (in the Press).

  • Tebb, G. &Thoday, J. M. (1954). Stability in development and relational balance of X chromosomes inDrosophila melanogaster.Nature, Lond.,174, 1109–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. I-V.Genetics,6, 111–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Member of the Scientific Staff, Agricultural Research Council, Great Britain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clayton, G.A., Morris, J.A. & Robertson, A. An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory I. Short-term responses to selection. J Genet 55, 131–151 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981620

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981620

Keywords

Navigation