Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the monoterpene composition inPinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar,Thaumetopoea pityocampa

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary results on attempts to extract and characterize the volatile secondary metabolites contained in needles of differentPinus species and to ascertain the role played by these substances on the behavior ofThaumetopoea pityocampa (Denis et Schiffermüller) females, which show a marked preference, during the oviposition period, for some indigenous and exotic species of host plants existing in mixed formation. Limonene is the most abundant monoterpene extracted fromP. pinea needles, the least favored species of pine processionary caterpillar (PPC) females, although it is present in only very low amounts in otherPinus species. An increase was observed in limonene production byP. pinea at the start of the flight period of the PPC adult, and subsequently at the beginning of the females’ oviposition period. Assays carried out in two pine stands in central Italy showed that limonene, emulsified with water and sprayed on foliage of four different pine species plants,P. sylvestris, P. nigra, P. pinaster andP. radiata, during the PPC oviposition period, provided a satisfactory degree of protection. In fact, the number of egg clusters collected from treated plants was often lower than the number of egg clusters collected from control plants and was comparable to the number of egg clusters laid onP. pinea plants. In particular (R)-(+)-limonene, although not produced in nature by pines, was the most effective deterrent. However, the effect of (S)-(-)-limonene, the enantiomer biosynthesized by pines, was also adequate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altaro, R.I., Pierce, H.D., Jr., Borden, J.H. and Oehlschlager, A.C. (1980) Role of volatile and nonvolatile components of Sitka spruce bark as feeding stimulants forPissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Can. J. Zool. 58:626–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battisti, A. (1989)Thaumetopoea pityocampa: bio-ecologia e problemi di energetica in ecosistemi di pineta.Atti Convegno Awersità del Bosco e delle Specie Arboree da Legno (Firenze, Italy, 1987), pp. 223–234.

  3. Buxton, R.D. (1990) The influence of host tree species on timing of pupation ofThaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lep. Thaumetopoeidae) and its exposure to parasitism byPhryxe caudata Rond (Dipt., Larvaevoridae).J. Appl. Entomol. 109:302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calas, J. (1897) La Processionaire du Pin(Cnethocampa pityocampa). Rev. des Eaux et Forêt, pp. 705–723.

  5. Geri, C. (1980) Étude sur les populations de processionnaire du pin (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., Lepidoptera Thaumetopoeidae).in: Grison, P. [Ed.] Études Écologiques et Ethnologiques dans le Niolu. Ch. VII.Ecol. Mediterr. 6:151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geri, C. (1983) Répartition et évolution des populations de la processionnaire du pin,Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae) dans les montagnes corses. 1. Régimes d’apparition de l’insecte et dynamique des populations.Acta Oecol. Oecol. Appl. 4:247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halperin, J. (1990) Life history ofThaumetopoea spp. (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae) in Israel.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huchon, H. and Demolin, G. (1970) La bioécologie de la Processionnaire du pin, dispersion potentielle, dispersion actuelle.Rev. For. Fr. n. sp. La Lutte Biologique en Forêt pp. 220–233.

  9. Jactel, H., Kleinhentz, M., Marpeau-Bezard, A., Marion-Poll, F., Menassieu, P. and Burban, C. (1996) Terpene variations in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection byDioryctria sylverstella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1037–1050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leather, S.R. (1987) Pine monoterpenes stimulate oviposition in the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43:295–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leather, S.R., Watt, A.D. and Barbour, D.A. (1985) The effect of host-plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and lifespan of the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management.Bull. Entomol. Res. 75:641–651.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masutti, L. (1964) Ricerche sui parassiti oofagi dellaThaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.Ann. Centro Econ. Mont. Venezie 4:205–271.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masutti, L. and Battisti, A. (1990)Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) in Italy. Bionomics and perspectives of integrated control.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mendel, Z. (1988) Host selection by the pine processionary caterpillarThawnetopoea wilkinsoni.Phytoparaxitica 16:101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mori, K. (1998) Semiochemicals — Synthesis, Stereochemistry and Bioactivity.Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1479–1489.

  16. Sadof, C.S. and Grant, G.G. (1997) Monoterpene composition ofPinus sylvestris varieties resistant and susceptible toDioryctria zimmermani.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1917–1927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schopf, R. and Avtzis, N. (1987) Die Bedeutung von Nadelinhaltsstoffen für die Disposition von fünf Kiefernarten gegenüberThaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.).J. Appl. Entomol. 103:340–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shu, S., Grant, G.G., Langevin, D., Lombardo, D.A. and MacDonald, L. (1997) Oviposition and electroantennogram responses ofDioryctria abietivorella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) elicited by monoterpenes and enantiomers from eastern white pine.J. Chem. Ecol. 23:35–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stadler, E. (1974) Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behavior of the eastern spruce budworm.Entoinol. Exp. Appl. 17:176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiberi, R. (1983) Sulla distribuzione delle ovature diThaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.) in un giovane impianto diPinus pinaster eP. insignis.Redia 66:603–614.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tiberi, R. (1989)Thawnetopoea pityocampa: convenienza delle iniziative di controllo e possibilità di interverti razionali.Atti Convegno Avversità del Bosco e delle Specie Arboree da Legno (Firenze, Italy, 1987), pp. 313–323.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Tiberi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiberi, R., Niccoli, A., Curini, M. et al. The role of the monoterpene composition inPinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar,Thaumetopoea pityocampa . Phytoparasitica 27, 263–272 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981482

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981482

Key Words

Navigation