Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The postharvest phase: Emerging technologies for the control of fungal diseases

  • Minireview
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postharvest biological treatment entails a range of different approaches, including strengthening of the commodity’s natural defense mechanisms and application of antagonistic microorganisms and natural antimicrobial substances. Postharvest biological treatment has highlighted the potential of antagonistic microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and yeasts) against a limited number of pathogens, and only on specific hosts. Further studies are therefore required to identify antagonists with a broad spectrum of activity. The resistance of fruits and vegetables to postharvest diseases is closely linked to the ripening process, and drops markedly with the onset of tissue senescence: It is now possible to protect the product by inducing disease resistance. Plants produce a large number of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial effect on the main postharvest pathogens. Detailed studies have been conducted on aromatic compounds, essential oils and volatile substances. Combination of the above complementary techniques could well lead to effective control of postharvest fungal diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adikaram, N.K.B., Brown, A.E. and Swinburne, T.R. (1988) Phytoalexin induction as a factor in the protection ofCapsicum annuun L. fruits against infection byBotrytis cinerea Pers.J. Phytopathol. 122:267–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arul, J. (1994) Emerging technologies for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables, pp. 1–10.in: Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. [Eds.] Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases. Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, J.A. and Deverall, B.J. [Eds.] (1983) The Dynamics of Host Defense. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boulet, M., Arul, J., Verret, P. and Kane, O. (1989) Induced resistance of stored mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits to mold infection by treatment withColletotrichum gloeosporioides L. cell wall hydrolysate.Can. lnst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 22:161–168.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowles, D.J. (1990) Defense-related proteins in higher plants.Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:873–907.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caccioni, D.R.L. and Guizzardi, M. (1994) Inhibition of germination and growth of fruit and vegetable postharvest pathogenic fungi by essential oil components.J. Ess. Oil Res. 6:173–179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caccioni, D.R.L., Tonini, G. and Guizzardi, M. (1994) Postharvest treatments with acetaldehyde vapors forMonilinia laxa (Aderh. and Ruhl.) Honey control in stone fruits.Proc. Environmental Biotic Factors in Integrated Plant Disease Control (Poznan, Poland), pp. 185–187.

  8. Caccioni, D.R.L., Tonini, G. and Guizzardi, M. (1995) Antifungal activity of stone fruit aroma compounds againstMonilinia laxa (Aderh. et Ruhl.) Honey andRhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.):In vivo trials.J. Plant Dis. Prot. 102:518–525.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caia, G., Bertoluzza, A. and Foschi, F. (1988) Fitofarmaci e legislazione. pp. 236–250.in: Goidnich, G. and Pratella, G.C. [Eds.] Fitofarmaci, Igiene e Ambiente. Maggioli, Rimini, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chand-Goyal, T. and Spotts, R.A. (1996) Control of postharvest pear diseases using natural saprophytic yeast colonists and their combination with a low dosage of thiabendazole.Postharvest Biol. Technol. 7:51–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Couey, H.M. (1989) Heat treatment for control of postharvest diseases and insect pests of fruits.HortScience 24:198.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delaquis, P.J. and Mazza, G. (1995) Antimicrobial properties of isothiocyanates in food preservation.Food Technol. 49:73–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon, R.A. and Lamb, C. (1990) Molecular communication in interaction between plants and microbial pathogens.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41:339–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Hover, B., Cohen, L., Gaba, V., Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. (1993) Factors affecting UV-induced resistance in grapefruit against the green mould decay caused byPenicillium digitatum.Plant Pathol. 42:418–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Droby, S., Chalutz, E., Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. (1989) Characterization of the biocontrol activity ofDebaromyces hansenii in the control ofPenicillium digitatum on grapefruit.Can. J. Microbiol. 35:790–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Droby, S., Hofstein, R., Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M., Fridlender, B., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Daus, A., Timar, D. and Chalutz, E. (1993) Pilot test ofPichia guilliermondii: a biocontrol agent of postharvest diseases of citrus fruit.Biol. Control 3:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Droby, S., Robin, D., Chalutz, E. and Chet, I. (1993) Possible role of glucanase and extracellular polymers in the mode of action of yeast antagonists of postharvest diseases.Phytoparasitica 21:167 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Droby, S., Wisniewski, M.E., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Touiton, D., Eilam, Y. and Chalutz, E. (1997) Influence of CaCl2 onPenicillium digitatum, grapefruit peel tissue, and biocontrol activity ofPichia guilliermondii.Phytopathology 87:310–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Ghaouth, A., Arul, J., Grenier, J. and Asselin, A. (1992) Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits.Phytopathology 82:398–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Ghaouth, A. and Wilson, C.L. (1995) Biologically-based technologies for the control of postharvest diseases.Postharvest News Inf. 6:5N-11N.

    Google Scholar 

  21. El-Goorani, M.A. and Sommer, N.F. (1981) Effects of modified atmosphere on postharvest pathogens of fruits and vegetables.Hortic. Rev. 3:412–461.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elakovich, S.D. (1988) Terpenoids as models for new agrochemicals.ACS Symp. Ser. 380:2580–2610.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fenwick, G.R., Heaney, R.K. and Mullin, W.J. (1983) Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants.CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 18:123–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. French, R.C. (1985) The bioregulatory action of flavour compounds on fungal spores and other propagules.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23:173–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffiths, E. (1981) Iatrogenic plant diseases.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 19:69–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gueldner, R.C, Reilly, C.C., Pusey, P.L., Costello, C.E., Arrendale, R.F., Cox, R.H., Himmelsbach, D.S., Crumley, E.G. and Cutler, H.G. (1988) Isolation and identification of iturins as antifungal peptides in biological control of peach brown rot withBacillus subtilis.J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:366–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guizzardi, M., Elad, Y. and Mari, M. (1995) Treatments against postharvest fruit diseases using Trichodex(Trichoderma harzianum). Proc. V Int. Trichoderma/Gliocladium Workshop (Beltsville, MD, USA), p. 39.

  28. Haram, W. (1980) Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huang, Y., Deverall, B.J., Morris, S.C. and Wild, B.L. (1993) Biocontrol of postharvest orange diseases by a strain ofPseudomonas cepacia under semi-commercial conditions.Postharvest Biol. Technol. 3:293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Janisiewicz, W. (1994) Enhancement of biocontrol of blue mold with nutrient analog 2-deoxy-D-glucose on apples and pears.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:2671–2676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Janisiewicz, W. and Marchi, A. (1992) Control of storage rots on various pear cultivars with a saprophytic strain ofPseudomonas syringae.Plant Dis. 76:555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Janisiewicz, W., Yourman, L., Roitman, J. and Mahoney, N. (1991) Postharvest control of blue mold and gray mold of apples and pears by dip treatment with pyrrolnitrin, a metabolite ofPseudomonas cepacia.Plant Dis. 75:490–494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, J.J., Ben-Yehoshua, S., Shapiro, B., Henis, Y. and Carmeli, S. (1991) Accumulation of scoparone in heat-treated lemon fruit inoculated withPenicillium digitatum Sacc.Plant Physiol. 97:880–885.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ku, I.H. (1987) Plant immunization and its applicability to disease control. pp. 255–274.in: Chet, I. [Ed.] Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leben, C, Daft, G.C., Wilson, J.D. and Winter, H.F. (1965) Field tests for disease control by an epiphytic bacterium.Phytopathology 70:663–665.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mari, M., Guizzardi, M., Brunelli, M. and Folchi, A. (1996) Postharvest biological control of grey mould(Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr.) on fresh-market tomatoes withBacillus amyloliquefaciens.Crop Prot. 15:699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mari, M., Guizzardi, M. and Pratella, G.C. (1996) Biological control of grey mold in pears by antagonistic bacteria.Biol. Control 7:30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mari, M., Iori, R., Leoni, O. and Marchi, A. (1993)In vitro activity of glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates against postharvest fruit pathogens.Ann. Appl. Biol. 123:155–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mari, M., Iori, R., Leoni, O. and Marchi, A. (1996) Bioassays of glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates against postharvest pear pathogens.Plant Pathol. 45:753–760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mattheis, J.P. and Roberts, R.G. (1993) Fumigation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium “Bing”) fruit with low molecular weight aldehydes for postharvest decay control.Plant Dis. 77:810–814.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McGuire, R.G. (1994) Application ofCandida guilliermondii in commercial citrus coatings for biocontrol ofPenicillium digitatum on grapefruits.Biol. Control 4:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mendelson, M., Delfosse, E., Grable, C, Kough, J., Bays, D. and Hutton, P. (1994) Commercialization, facilitation, and implementation of biological control agents: a government perspective. pp. 123–133. Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. [Eds.]in: Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases. Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mercier, J., Arul, J., Ponnampalam, R. and Boulet, M. (1993) Induction of 6-methoxymellein on resistance to storage pathogens in carrots slices by UV-C.J. Phytopathol. 137:44–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mercier, J. and Wilson, C.L. (1995) Effect of wound moisture on the biocontrol byCandida oleophila of gray mold rot (Botrytis cinerea) of apple.Postharvest Biol. Technol. 6:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pratella, G.C, Mari, M., Guizzardi, M. and Folchi, A. (1993) Preliminary studies on the efficiency of endophytes in the biological control of the postharvest pathogensMonilinia laxa andRhizopus stolonifer in stone fruit.Postharvest Biol. Technol. 3:361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pusey, P.L., Wilson, C.L., Hotchkiss, M.W. and Franklin, J.D. (1986) Compatibility ofBacillus subtilis for postharvest control of peach brown rot with commercial waxes, dicloran and cold storage conditions.Plant Dis. 70:587–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts, R.G. (1990) Biological control of Mucor rot of pear byCryptococcus laurentii, C. flavus andC. albidus.Phytopathology 80:1051.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rodov, V., Ben-Yehoshua, S., Fang, D., DHallewin, G. and Castia, T. (1994) Accumulation of phytoalexins scoparone and scopoletin in citrus fruits subjected to various postharvest treatments.Acta Hortic. 381:517–524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rodov, V., Ben-Yehoshua, S., Kim, J.J., Shapiro, B. and Ittah, Y. (1992) Ultraviolet illumination induces scoparone production in kumquat and orange fruit and improves decay resistance.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117:788–792.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Samish, Z., Etinger-Tulczynska, R. and Bick, M. (1963) The microflora within the tissue of fruits and vegetables.J Food Sci. 28:259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Smilanick, J.L. (1994) Strategies for the isolation and testing of biocontrol agents.in: Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. [Eds.] pp. 25–41. Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases. Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smilanick, J.L. and Dennis-Arrue, R. (1992) Control of green mold of lemons withPseudomonas species.Plant Dis. 76:481–485.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smilanick, J.L., Gouin-Behe, C.C., Margosan, D.A., Bull, C.T. and Mackey, B.E. (1996) Virulence on citrus ofPseudomonas syringae strains that control postharvest green mold of citrus fruit.Plant Dis. 80:1123–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Spotts, R.A. and Cervantes, L.A. (1986) Populations, pathogenicity and benomyl resistance ofBotrytis spp.,Penicillium spp. andMucor piriformis in packing houses.Plant Dis. 70:106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Spotts, R.A. and Chen, P.M. (1987) Prestorage heat treatments for control of decay of pear fruit.Phytopathology 77:1578–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Stadelbacher, G.J. and Prasad, K. (1974) Postharvest decay control of apple by acetaldehyde vapour.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 99:364–368.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tronsmo, A. and Raa, J. (1977) Antagonistic action ofTrichoderma pseudokoningii against the apple pathogenBotrytis cinerea.Phytopathol. Z. 89:216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson, C.L. (1989) Managing the microflora of harvested fruits and vegetables to enhance resistance.Phytopathology 79:1387–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wilson, C.L., Franklin, J.D. and Pusey, P.L. (1987) Biological control ofRhizopus rot of peach withEnterobacter cloacae.Phytopathology 77:303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilson, C.L. and Pusey, P.L. (1985) Potential for biological control of postharvest plant diseases.Plant Dis. 69:375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. (1989) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables an emerging technology.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:425–441.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson, C.L. and Wisniewski, M.E. [Eds.] (1994) Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables — Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wisniewski, M.E. and Wilson, C.L. (1992) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: Recent advances.HortScience 27:94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zimand, G., Elad, Y. and Chet, I. (1996) Effect ofTrichoderma harzianum onBotrytis cinerea pathogenicity.Phytopathology 86:1255–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CRIOF, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy

    Monica Guizzardi

Authors
  1. Marta Mari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monica Guizzardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Guizzardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mari, M., Guizzardi, M. The postharvest phase: Emerging technologies for the control of fungal diseases. Phytoparasitica 26, 59–66 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981267

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981267

Key Words

Search

Navigation