Abstract
In both laboratory and field trials, as well as in semicommercial scale applications, the minimum concentration ofBacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) required to secure satisfactory larval mortality ofBoarmia selenaria could be halved, from 0.5% to 0.25%, by addition of 1% of the commercial phagostimulant Coax. Another phagostimulant product, Gustol, was inactive. Coax did not attract caterpillars from a distance. However, individual, Coax-treated spots on the avocado leaf surface were consumed by the larvae to a significantly greater extent than control. The same difference in palatability was recorded when the spots were treated with a mixture of Coax and aB.t. formulation. This explains, at least partially, the aforementioned advantageous effect of Coax in practical control of the looper byB.t.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. (1980) Data sheet on Coax. Traders Protein Division, Traders Oil Mill Co., Fort Worth, TX, U.S.A.
Anon. (1980) Data sheet on Gustol. Sandoz Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Bailey, J.B. and Hoffman, M.P. (1980) Pesticide experiments for a California avocado IPM program.Calif. Avoc. Soc. Yb. 64:107–120.
Ignoffo, C.M., Hostetter, D.L. and Smith, D.B. (1976) Gustatory stimulant, sunlight protectant, evaporation retardant: three characteristics of a microbial insecticidal adjuvant.J. econ. Ent. 69:207–210.
Izhar, Y., Wysoki, M. and Gur, L. (1979) The effectiveness ofBacillus thuringiensis Berliner onBoarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiff. (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in laboratory tests and field trials.Phytoparasitica 7:65–77.
Luttrell, R.G., Young, S.Y., Yearian, W.C. and Horton, D.L. (1982) Evaluation ofBacillus thuringiensis—spray adjuvant—viral insecticide combinations againstHeliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Envir. Ent. 11:783–787.
Meisner, J., Ascher, K.R.S. and Eizick, C. (1984) Effect of the commercial phagostimulants Coax and Gustol on the toxicity of Cypermethrin and deltamethrin againstSpodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).J. econ. Ent. 77:1123–1126.
Meisner, J., Ascher, K.R.S. and Rowers, H.M. (1972) Feeding response of the larva of the Egyptian cotton leafworm,Spodoptera littoralis Boisd., to sugars and related compounds. I. Phagostimulatory and deterrent effects.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 42A:899–914.
Shorey, M.H. and Hale, L.L. (1965) Mass rearing of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium.J. econ. Ent. 58:522–524.
Sneh, B. (1980) [Biological control of larvae ofSpodoptera littoralis with the help of bacteria and improvement of the composition of the substrate and fermentation conditions in production of the isolateB.t. 24.]in: Cohen, A. [Ed.] [Abstracts of Researches in Cotton Growing.] Israel Ministry of Agriculture, Tel Aviv, p. 295 (in Hebrew).
Sneh, B. and Gross, S. (1983) Biological control of the Egyptian cotton leafwormSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lep. Noctuidae) in cotton and alfalfa fields using a preparation ofBacillus thuringiensis ssp.entomocidus, supplemented with adjuvants.Z. angew. Ent. 95:418–424.
Wysoki, M. (1982) A bibliography of the giant looper,Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiffermüller, 1775 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), for the years 1913–1981.Phytoparasitica 10:65–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization. No. 2879-E, 1990 series.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meisner, J., Hadar, D., Wysoki, M. et al. Phagostimulants enhancing the efficacy ofBacillus Thuringiensis formulations against the Giant Looper,Boarmia (Ascotis) Selenaria, in avocado. Phytoparasitica 18, 107–115 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981227
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981227