Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging behavior of two species of the genuschilocorus (coccinellidae: coleoptera): a comparative study

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The searching behavior of two coccinellid beetles of the genusChilocorus (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) was compared. The main components of the searching behavior of larvae and adults - speed of search and change of angle before and after successful encounter with hosts - were compared within and between species. Both species (at the larval and adult stages) changed their searching behavior following successful encounter, by increasing the angle and number of turns per unit of time. These changes were coupled with reductions in the speed of locomotion. The intensity of the changes differed significantly between the species.C. bipustulatus demonstrated a stronger response in the degree of change in angle thanC. kuwanae. As time elapsed and unsuccessful search continued, the beetles returned to their original pattern of search. Both species allocated an increasing proportion of their time to patches of hosts, in accordance with host density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks, C.J. (1954) The searching behaviour of coccinellid larvae.Anim. Behav. 2:37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banks, C.J. (1957) The behaviour of individual coccinellid larvae on plants.Anim. Behav. 5:12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, M.C. and Dixon, A.F.G. (1982) Habitat quality and foraging behaviour of coccinellid larvae.j. Anim. Ecol. 51:865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cody, ML. (1971) Finch flocks in the Mohave desert.Theor. Popul. Biol. 2:142–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cody, ML. (1974) Optimization in ecology.Science, N.Y. 183:1156–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, R.M. and Hubbard, S.F. (1977) Adaptive searching strategies in insect parasites.J. Anim. Ecol. 46:115 -125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon, A.F.G. (1959) An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory coccinellid beetleAdalia decempunctata (L.).J. Anim. Ecol. 28:259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleschner, C.A. (1950) Studies on searching capacity of the larvae of three predators of the citrus red mite. Hilgardia20:233–265.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Formanowicz, D.R. Jr. (1982) Foraging tactics of larvae ofDytiscus verticalis (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): The assessment of prey density.j. Anim. Ecol. 51:757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassell, M.P. (1966) Evaluation of parasite or predator responses.J. Anim. Ecol. 42:693–736.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hassell, M.P. and Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Foraging strategies of insects. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst.9:75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hubbard, S.F. and Cook, R.M. (1978) Optimal foraging by parasitoid wasps.J. Anim. Ecol. 47:593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamburov, S.S., Nadel, D.J. and Kenneth, R. (1967) Observations onHesperomyces virescens Thaxter, a fungus associated with premature mortality ofChilocorus bipustulatus L.Israel J. agrie. Res. 17:131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laing, J. (1938) Host finding by insect parasites. II. The chance ofTrichogramma evanescens finding its hosts.j. exp. Biol. 15:281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, B. (1963) Ecology of two carabid beetles,Bembidion lampros (Herbst) and.Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank). I. Life cycles and feeding behaviour.j. Anim. Ecol. 32:289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murdie, G. and Hassell, M.P. (1978) Food distribution, searching success and predatorprey models,in: Hiorns, R.E. [Ed.] The Mathematical Theory of the Dynamics of Biological Populations, pp. 87–101. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nadel, D.J: and Biron, S. (1964) Laboratory studies and controlled mass rearing ofChilocorns bipustulatus L., a citrus scale predator in Israel.Riv. Parassit. 25:195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Podoler, H. and Henen, J. (1983) The effects of constant temperatures on developmental time and survival of two coccinellid beetles of the genusChilocorus: A comparative study.Phytoparasitica 11:167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pyke, G.H., Pulliam, H.R. and Charnov, E.L. (1977) Optimal foraging, a selective review of theory and tests.Q. Rev. Biol. 52:137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, E.J. (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stamp, N.E. (1982) Searching behaviour of parasitoids for web-making caterpillars: A test of optimal searching theory.j. Anim. Ecol. 51:387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Storch, R.H. (1976) Prey detection by 4th stageCoccinella transversoguttata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae),Anim. Behav. 24:690–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stubbs, M. (1980) Another look at prey detection by coccinellids.Ecol. Ent. 5:179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waage, J.K. (1978) Arrestment responses of the parasitoidNemeritis canescens to contact chemical products by its host,Plodia interpunctella.Physiol. Ent. 3:135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Waage, J.K. (1979) Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by the parasitoid,Nemeritis canescens.J. Anim. Ecol. 48:353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Podoler, H., Henen, J. Foraging behavior of two species of the genuschilocorus (coccinellidae: coleoptera): a comparative study. Phytoparasitica 14, 11–23 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980474

Key words

Navigation