Abstract
Goals, Scope and Background
From 2005, deposition of organic waste will be banned in Sweden. Likewise, in Germany and Austria, similar bans are being planned, and further countries will probably follow. Thus, there is a need to develop new methods and to refine established techniques for sludge management in the whole of the European Union. For this end, there is also an urgent need for appropriate ecotoxicological approaches to elucidate and assess the hazard potential of sewage sludge. Therefore, the present study was designed to assess the capacity of various established sludge treatment methods using different oxygen regimes to degrade recalcitrant nitro-substituted organic compounds and reduce their toxicity. Sewage sludge samples from a wastewater treatment plant in Sweden (Cambrex Karlskoga AB, industrial area Björkborn) receiving wastewater from industries manufacturing pharmaceutical substances, chemical intermediates and explosives were processed with different sludge treatment methods. Among other treatment methods, bioreactors (for anaerobic and aerobic sludge treatment) were used. In the present investigation, a battery ofin vitro bioassays was employed to compare the cytotoxic and genotoxic potentials of different fractions of sludge samples in order to elucidate whether the treatments were suitable to reduce the toxicity of the sludge.
Methods
In order to investigate the cytotoxicity of the extracts of treated and untreated sludge samples, the acute cytotoxicity test with the permanent cell line RTL-W1 was used. Genotoxicity was tested by means of the comet assay (single cell gel electro-phoresis) with RTL-W1cells, and mutagenicity was assessed with the Ames test using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA98NR and TA100. Sludge toxicity was tested in different fractions of organic extracts produced by acetone and hexane extractions. The subsequent clean-up procedure (silica gel chro-matography and elution with hexane and dichloromethane) resulted in two fractions, a lipophilic hexane-fraction and a semi-lipophilic dichloromethane-fraction. For the genotoxicity and mutagenicity tests, these fractions were reunited at equal ratios.
Results and Discussion
The acute cytotoxicity test with RTL-Wl cells revealed a high cytotoxic potential for the semi-li-pophilic DM-fractions of all sludge samples with NR50 values (= effective concentration for 50% cell death in the neutral red test) from 8.9 up to 20 mg sludge d.w./ml medium. A low cytotoxic potential for the hexane fractions of the untreated sludge samples (NR50 400 to < 400 mg sludge d.w./ml medium) was observed, whereas the hexane fractions of the treated sludge samples showed elevated cytotoxicity increasing further with treatment in the bioreactors. The comet assay indicated that three out of eight of the reunited fractions had a significant genotoxic potential. Whereas the genotoxic potential of one sample treated anaerobically was very high with an induction factor of 11.6, a similar sample (taken from the same anaerobic reactor four months later) and one untreated sample showed lower potentials. The samples treated in another anaerobic bioreactor as well as the samples treated aerobically showed no genotoxic potential. Results indicate that aerobic treatment was basically adequate for reducing the genotoxicity of the sludge, whereas anaerobic treatment was only partly useful for reduction of genotoxicity. The Ames test revealed a very high mutagenic potential for the reunited fractions of the untreated sludge samples with strain TA98 (maximum induction factors (IFmax up to 45) and a relatively high potential for one of the samples treated aerobically (S2, IFmax = 18 (TA98, S9-)), thus documenting the suitability of both anaerobic and aerobic treatments to reduce the mutagenicity of the samples, however, with the aerobic treatment being less effective. Conclusions. Overall, none of the microbiological treatments for wastewater sludge in bioreactors was found to be ideal for general toxicity reduction of the sludge samples. Whereas cytotoxicity of the sludge increased or levelled off in most cases following either treatment, genotoxicity both increased or decreased after anaerobic treatment, depending on the specific sample. However, mutagenicity could generally be reduced by anaerobic treatment and, to a lesser degree, by aerobic treatment. Recommendationsand Perspectives. The complex modification of the diverse damage potentials of sludge sample extracts by use of anin vitro biotest battery following treatment for toxicity reduction in bioreactors showed that considerations of different toxicological endpoints is essential for an adequate hazard assessment. Whereas in the case of cytotoxicity reduction, the reactors proved ineffective, mutagenicity could be reduced significantly at least in some cases in this case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlf W, Hollert H, Neumann-Hensel H, Ricking M (2002): A Guidance for the Assessment and Evaluation of Sediment Quality: A German Approach Based on Ecotoxicological and Chemical Measurements. JSS - Journal of Soils and Sediments 2, 37–42
Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1985): Toxicity determinedin vitro by morphological alterations an neutral red absorption. Toxicol Letters 24, 119–124
Collins A, Harrington V (2002): Repair of oxidative DNA damage: assessing its contribution to cancer prevention. Mutagenesis 17, 489–493
Cotelle S, Ferard JF (1999): Comet assay in genetic ecotoxicology: a review. Environ Mol Mutagen 34, 246–55.
Couch DB, Allen PF, Abernethy DJ (1981): The mutageniciry of dinitro- toluenes inSalmonella typhimurium. Mutat Res 90, 373–383
Dekant W, Vamvakas S (1994): Toxikologie. Spektrum-Verlag, Heidelberg, 432 pp
Donlon BA, Razo-Flores E, Field JA, Lettinga G (1995): Toxicity of N- substituted aromatics to acetoclastic methanogenic activity in granular sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 3889–3893
Esteve-Nünez A, Caballero A, Ramos JL (2001): Biological degradation of 2,4,6- trinitrotoluene. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65, 335–352, table of contents
Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O’Neill KL (1995): The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res 339, 37–59
Gorontzy T, Drzyga O, Kahl MW, Bruns-Nagel D, Breitung J, von Loew E, Blotevogel K-H (1994): Microbial degradation of explosives and related compounds. Critical reviews in microbiology 20, 265–284
Gustavsson L, Olsman H, Klee N, Hollert H, Engwall M (2004): Dioxin- like activity in an industrial sludge containing explosives and pharmaceutical residues. ESPR - Environ Sci & Polut Res, under revision
Haidour A, Ramos JL (1996): Identification of products resulting from the biological reduction of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluol, 2,4-Dinitrotoluol and 2,6- Dinitrotoluol byPseudomonas sp. Environ Sci Technol 30, 2365–2370
Hawaii J, Halasz A, Paquet L, Zhou E, Spencer B, Ampleman G, Thiboutot S (1998): Characterization of metabolites in the biotransformation of 2,4,6- trinitrotoluene with anaerobic sludge: role of triaminotoluene. Appl Environ Microbiol 64, 2200–2206
Hawari J, Halasz A, Beaudet S, Paquet L, Ampleman G, Thiboutot S (1999): Biotransformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene with Phanerochaete chryso- sporium in agitated cultures at pH 4.5. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 2977–2986
Hawari J, Beaudet S, Halasz A, Thiboutot S, Ampleman G (2000): Microbial degradation of explosives: Biotransformation versus mineralization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54, 605–18
Hoffman K, Hammer E (1999): Anaerobic formation and degradation of toxic aromatic compounds in agriculture and communal sewage deposites. Chemosphere 38, 2561–2568
Hollert H, Dürr M, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2000): Cytotoxicity of settling particulate matter (SPM) and sediments of the Neckar river (Germany) during a winter flood. Environ Toxicol Chem 19, 528–534
Hollert H, Dürr M, Olsman H, Haüdin K, Bavel Bv, Brack W, Tysklind M, Engwall M, Braunbeck T (2002a): Biological and chemical determination of dioxin- like compounds in sediments by means of a sediment triad approach in the catchment area of the Neckar River. Ecotoxicology 11, 323–336
Hollert H, Heise S, Pudenz S, Brüggemann R, Ahlf W, Braunbeck T (2002b): Application of a sediment quality triad and different statistical approaches (hasse diagrams and fuzzy logic) for the comparative evaluation of small streams. Ecotoxicology 11, 311–321
Hollert H, Keiter S, König N, Rudolf M, Ulrich M, Braunbeck T (2003): A New Sediment Contact Assay to Assess Particle-bound Pollutants Using Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos. JSS - J Soils & Sediments 3, 197–207
Jarvis AS, McFarland VA, Honeycutt ME (1998): Assessment of the effectiveness of composting for the reduction of toxicity and mutageniciry of explosive-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 39, 131–135
Karamova NS, Il’inskaia ON, Ivanchenko OB (1994): Mutagenic activity of 2,4,6- trinitrotoluene: The role of metabolizing enzymes. Genetika 30, 898–902
Kosmehl T, Krebs F, Manz W, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2004): Comparative genotoxicity testing of sediment extracts with permanent cell lines RTG-2 and RTL-W1 in the Comet assay and Ames assay. JSS - J Soils & Sediments, OnlineFirsthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1065/ jss2004.03.095
Lachance B, Robidoux,PY, Hawari J, Ampleman G, Thiboutot S, Sunahara Gl (1999): Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of energetic compounds on bacterial and mammalian cells in vitro. Mutat Res 444, 25–39
Lee LE, demons JH, Bechtel DG, Caldwell SJ, Han KB, Pasitschniak-Arts M, Mosser D, Bols NC (1993): Development and characterization of a rainbow trout liver cell line expressing cytochrome p450-dependent monooxygenase activity. Cell Biol Toxicol 9, 279–294
Lee RF, Steinert S (2003): Use of the single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay for detecting DNA damage in aquatic (marine and freshwater) animals. Mutat Res 544, 43–64
Maron DM, Ames BN (1983): Revised methods for theSalmonella mutageniciry test. Mut Res 113, 173–215
Marquardt H, Schäfer SG (1994): Lehrbuch der Toxikologie. - Bl-Wissen- schaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1004 pp
McCormick NG, Feehcrry FE, Levinson HS (1976): Microbial transformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and other nitroaromatic compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 31, 949–958
NTP (2002): NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of o-nitrotoluene in F344/N Rats and B6C3F, Mice (Feed Studies)-Na-tional Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Public Health Service-National Institutes of Health, 368 pp
Padda RS, Wang CY, Hughes JB, Bennett GN (2000): Mutageniciry of trinitrotoluene and metabolites formed during anaerobic degradation byClostridium Acetobutylicum ATCC 824. EnvironToxicol Chem 19, 2871–2875
Pasti-Grigsby MB, Lewis TA, Crawford DL, Crawford RL (1996): Trans- formation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) by actinomycetes isolated from TNT-contaminated and uncontaminated environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 1120–1123
Rodgers JD, Bunce NJ (2001): Treatment methods for the remediation of nitroaromatic explosives. Water Research 35, 2101–2111
Schnurstein A, Braunbeck T (2001): Tail moment versus tail length-application of an in vitro version of the comet assay in biomonitoring for genotoxicity in native surface waters using primary hepatocytes and gill cells from zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 49, 187–196
Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL (1988): A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 175, 184–191
Snellinx Z, Nepovim A, Taghavi S, Vangronsveld J, Vanek T, van der Lelie D (2002): Biological remediation of explosives and related nitroaromatic compounds. ESPR - Environ Sci Sc Pollut Res Int 9, 48–61
Sundvall A, Maklund H, Rannug U (1984): The mutagenicity onSalmonella typhimurium of nitrobenzoic acids and other wastewater components generated in the production of nitrobenzoic acids and nitrotoluenes. Mut Res 137
Suzuki J, Koyama T, Suzuki S (1983): Mutagenicities of mono-nitrobenzene derivatives in the presence of norharman. Mutat Res 120, 105–110
Thompson DC, Perera K, London R (1996): Studies on the mechanism of hepatotoxicity of 4-methylphenol (p-cresol): effects of deuterium labelling and ring substitution. Chem Biol Interact 101, 1–11
Whong WZ, Edwards GS (1984): Genotoxic activity of nitroaromatic explosives and related compounds in Salmonella typhimurium. Mutat Res 136, 209–215
Won WD, DiSalvo LH, Ng J (1976): Toxicity and mutagenicity of 2,4,-6- trinitrotoluene and its microbial metabolites. Appl Environ Microbiol 31, 576–580
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper has been developed from a presentation given at the 8th SETAC-GLB Conference ‘pNew Blood in Ecotoxicology’ held at Heidelberg, September 21 to 23, 2003.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klee, N., Gustavsson, L., Kosmehl, T. et al. Changes in toxicity and genotoxicity of industrial sewage sludge samples containing nitro- and amino-aromatic compounds following treatment in bioreactors with different oxygen regimes. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 11, 313–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979645
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979645