Skip to main content
Log in

Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment

  • Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of product assessments are often criticised as to their handling of uncertainty. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive methodology reflecting parameter uncertainty in combination with uncertainty due to choices in the outcome of LCAs. This paper operationalises the effect of combined parameter uncertainties in the inventory and in the characterisation factors for global warming and acidification for the comparison of two exemplary types of roof gutters. For this purpose, Latin Hypercube sampling is used in the matrix (inventory) method. To illustrate the influence of choices, the effect on LCA outcomes is shown of two different allocation procedures in open-loop recycling and three time horizons for global warming potentials. Furthermore, an uncertainty importance analysis is performed to show which parameter uncertainties mainly contribute to uncertainties in the comparison and the separate environmental profiles of the product systems. These results can be used to prioritise further data research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albritton, D., R.G. Derwent, I.S.A. Isaksen, M. Lal &D.J. Wuebbles (1995): Trace gas radiative forcing indices. In:Houghton, J.T., L.G. Meira Filho, J. Bruce, Hoesung Lee, B.A. Callander, E. Haites, N. Harris &K. Maskell. Climate change 1994: radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Albritton, D., R. Derwent, I. Isaksen, M. Lal &D. Wuebbles (1996): Trace gas radiative forcing indices. In:Houghton, J.T., L.G. Mfira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg &K. Maskell. Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Londen, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, K. &J.F. Kasting (1993): Insensitivity of global warming potentials to carbon dioxide emissions scenarios. Nature 366: 251–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Decisioneering (1996): Crystal Ball version 4.0. Forecasting and risk analysis for spreadsheet users. Denver, Colorado, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G., Y. Andersson-Sköld, M.O. Samuelsson, L. Zetterberg &L.-G. Lindfors (1992): Classification (impact analysis) in connection with life cycle assessments — a preliminary study. In: Product life cycle assessment — principles and methodology. Nord 1992:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht, R., P. Hoestetter, I. Knoepfel, M. Ménard, R. Dones &E. Zollinger (eds.) (1996): Ökoinventare für Energiesystemen. Grundlagen für den ökologischen Vergleich von Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Ökobilanzen für die Schweiz. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs, R., J.B. Guinée, G. Huppes, R.M. Lankreijer, H.A. Udo de Haes, A. Wegener Sleeswijk, A.M.M. Ansems, A.M.M. Eggels, R. van Duin &H.P. de Goede (1992): Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guidelines and backgrounds. Centre of Environmental Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs, R. (1994): A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products. Ecol. Econ. 10: 69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs, R. (1996): Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life cycle assessments. J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3-4): 159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild, M. &H. Wenzel (1998): Environmental assessment of products. Volume 2: Scientific background. Chapter 4: Acidification as a criterion in the environmental assessment of products. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M.A.J. (1998): Application of Uncertainty and Variability in LCA. A General Framework for the Application of Uncertainty and Variability in Life-Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA 3 (5): 273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D.J., D.C. Montgomery &B.H. Quay (1996): Data quality. Stochastic environmental life cycle assessment modeling. A probabilistic approach to incorporate variable input data quality. Int. J. LCA 1 (4): 199–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kortman, J.G.M.,P.G. Eggels,G. Huppes,L. van Oers,E.W. Lindeijer,B.L. van der Ven &J.B. Guinée (1996): Inschatting milieu-effecten van de afdankfase van langcyclische produkten. SPA Programma rapportnr. 96.005. Rijksinstituut voor Integraal Zoetwaterbeheer en Afvalwaterbehandeling Werkdocument nr. 96.155x. Lelystad, The Netherlands

  • Microsoft ( 1995): Microsoft Excel version 7.0. Microsoft Corporation

  • Morgan, M.G. &M. Henrion (1990): A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, New york, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema, B.P. &M.S. Wesnæs, 1996. Data quality management for life cycle inventories: an example of using data quality indicators. J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3-4): 167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. J. Huijbregts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huijbregts, M.A.J. Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment. Int. J. LCA 3, 343–351 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979345

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979345

Keywords

Navigation