Abstract
Results of product assessments are often criticised as to their handling of uncertainty. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive methodology reflecting parameter uncertainty in combination with uncertainty due to choices in the outcome of LCAs. This paper operationalises the effect of combined parameter uncertainties in the inventory and in the characterisation factors for global warming and acidification for the comparison of two exemplary types of roof gutters. For this purpose, Latin Hypercube sampling is used in the matrix (inventory) method. To illustrate the influence of choices, the effect on LCA outcomes is shown of two different allocation procedures in open-loop recycling and three time horizons for global warming potentials. Furthermore, an uncertainty importance analysis is performed to show which parameter uncertainties mainly contribute to uncertainties in the comparison and the separate environmental profiles of the product systems. These results can be used to prioritise further data research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albritton, D., R.G. Derwent, I.S.A. Isaksen, M. Lal &D.J. Wuebbles (1995): Trace gas radiative forcing indices. In:Houghton, J.T., L.G. Meira Filho, J. Bruce, Hoesung Lee, B.A. Callander, E. Haites, N. Harris &K. Maskell. Climate change 1994: radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, London, UK
Albritton, D., R. Derwent, I. Isaksen, M. Lal &D. Wuebbles (1996): Trace gas radiative forcing indices. In:Houghton, J.T., L.G. Mfira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg &K. Maskell. Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Londen, UK
Caldeira, K. &J.F. Kasting (1993): Insensitivity of global warming potentials to carbon dioxide emissions scenarios. Nature 366: 251–253
Decisioneering (1996): Crystal Ball version 4.0. Forecasting and risk analysis for spreadsheet users. Denver, Colorado, USA
Finnveden G., Y. Andersson-Sköld, M.O. Samuelsson, L. Zetterberg &L.-G. Lindfors (1992): Classification (impact analysis) in connection with life cycle assessments — a preliminary study. In: Product life cycle assessment — principles and methodology. Nord 1992:9
Frischknecht, R., P. Hoestetter, I. Knoepfel, M. Ménard, R. Dones &E. Zollinger (eds.) (1996): Ökoinventare für Energiesystemen. Grundlagen für den ökologischen Vergleich von Energiesystemen und den Einbezug von Energiesystemen in Ökobilanzen für die Schweiz. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich, Switzerland
Heijungs, R., J.B. Guinée, G. Huppes, R.M. Lankreijer, H.A. Udo de Haes, A. Wegener Sleeswijk, A.M.M. Ansems, A.M.M. Eggels, R. van Duin &H.P. de Goede (1992): Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guidelines and backgrounds. Centre of Environmental Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands
Heijungs, R. (1994): A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products. Ecol. Econ. 10: 69–81
Heijungs, R. (1996): Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life cycle assessments. J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3-4): 159–166
Hauschild, M. &H. Wenzel (1998): Environmental assessment of products. Volume 2: Scientific background. Chapter 4: Acidification as a criterion in the environmental assessment of products. Chapman & Hall, London, UK
Huijbregts, M.A.J. (1998): Application of Uncertainty and Variability in LCA. A General Framework for the Application of Uncertainty and Variability in Life-Cycle Assessment. Int. J. LCA 3 (5): 273–280
Kennedy, D.J., D.C. Montgomery &B.H. Quay (1996): Data quality. Stochastic environmental life cycle assessment modeling. A probabilistic approach to incorporate variable input data quality. Int. J. LCA 1 (4): 199–207
Kortman, J.G.M.,P.G. Eggels,G. Huppes,L. van Oers,E.W. Lindeijer,B.L. van der Ven &J.B. Guinée (1996): Inschatting milieu-effecten van de afdankfase van langcyclische produkten. SPA Programma rapportnr. 96.005. Rijksinstituut voor Integraal Zoetwaterbeheer en Afvalwaterbehandeling Werkdocument nr. 96.155x. Lelystad, The Netherlands
Microsoft ( 1995): Microsoft Excel version 7.0. Microsoft Corporation
Morgan, M.G. &M. Henrion (1990): A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, New york, NY, USA
Weidema, B.P. &M.S. Wesnæs, 1996. Data quality management for life cycle inventories: an example of using data quality indicators. J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3-4): 167–174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huijbregts, M.A.J. Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment. Int. J. LCA 3, 343–351 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979345
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979345
Keywords
- Allocation rules
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- Latin hypercube simulation
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- LCA
- parameter uncertainty
- Life Cycle Assessment
- parameter uncertainty
- open-loop recycling
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- probabalistic simulation
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- scenario analysis
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- simulation
- Latin hypercube simulation
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- simulation
- probabalistic simulation
- parameter uncertainty
- LCA
- uncertainty
- LCA
- variability
- parameter